고소설에 있어 ‘流通’과 ‘詩運用’의 상관성에 관한 검토:<구운몽>을 중심으로
An Examination of the Correlation of the Circulation and the Use of Poems in Premodern Novels: Centered on Guunmong
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is one of the characteristics of premodern novels that most of them include some poems within them. Upon briefly examining the whole of the novels, we readily come to find that the use of the poems becomes different depending on how the novels are circulated. Working with Guunmong, this article intends to explore the correlative aspect of the use of poems and various ways of circulation such as written channel and oral channel, version in Korean and version in Chinese, handcopied one and commercial one, etc. As for the poems concerned, this article includes titles of 16 chapters, which are of the form of couplets as well as general poems inserted into premodern narratives. In case of the titles of 16 chapters, Chinese version is more manifest than Korean version in its poetic effect; in case of the inserted poems, the number of the poems is much less in commercially-printed edition than handcopied version. With no corroborative evidence of the oral performance of Guunmong, I would consider several points as clues for solving the problem: the frequency of the publication of commercially-printed edition, theme and content, oral cultural tradition which most of the premodern narratives have preserved, the phenomenon of storybook reciters' switching their occupation to the writers of commercially-printed storybooks.
Abstract
It is one of the characteristics of premodern novels that most of them include some poems within them. Upon briefly examining the whole of the novels, we readily come to find that the use of the poems becomes different depending on how the novels are circulated. Working with Guunmong, this article intends to explore the correlative aspect of the use of poems and various ways of circulation such as written channel and oral channel, version in Korean and version in Chinese, handcopied one and commercial one, etc. As for the poems concerned, this article includes titles of 16 chapters, which are of the form of couplets as well as general poems inserted into premodern narratives. In case of the titles of 16 chapters, Chinese version is more manifest than Korean version in its poetic effect; in case of the inserted poems, the number of the poems is much less in commercially-printed edition than handcopied version. With no corroborative evidence of the oral performance of Guunmong, I would consider several points as clues for solving the problem: the frequency of the publication of commercially-printed edition, theme and content, oral cultural tradition which most of the premodern narratives have preserved, the phenomenon of storybook reciters' switching their occupation to the writers of commercially-printed storybooks.
참고문헌 (17)
- 정규복, "九雲夢(한문 老尊B本)" (1996), 고대 민족문화연구소
- 윤영옥, "九雲夢(한문 乙巳本). in: 韓國漢文小說" (1984), 학문사
- 김병국, "구운몽(서울대본 국문 필사본)" (2007), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- "구운몽(박순호본 국문 필사본)" (1986), 月村文獻硏究所
- 정규복, "구운몽(국문 완판 105장본)" (1996), 고대민족문화연구소
- 김진세, "고소설의 작자와 독자. in: 한국고소설론 한국고소설학회 편" (1991), 아세아문화사
- 유탁일, "고소설의 유통구조. in: 한국고소설론 한국고소설학회 편" (1991), 아세아문화사
- 유탁일, "完板坊刻小說의 문헌적 연구" (1981), 학문사
- 유탁일, "韓國古小說批評資料集成" (1994), 아세아문화사
- 이창헌, "경판 방각소설의 판본 연구" (2000), 태학사
- 임성래, "조선 후기의 대중소설" (1995), 태학사
- 임형택, "18`9세기 ‘이야기꾼’과 소설의 발달. in: 고전문학을 찾아서" (1976), 문학과 지성사
- 정규복, "九雲夢硏究" (1974), 고려대학교출판부
- 정규복, "九雲夢原典의 硏究" (1977), 일지사
- 조동일, "한국소설의 이론" (1977), 지식산업사
- 차충환, "숙향전연구" (1999), 월인
- 王重民, "敦煌變文硏究. in: 敦煌變文論文錄 上(周紹良`白話文 編)" (1985), 明文書局
