도깨비 설화에 나타난‘몸’의 의미 - 주체와 타자의 새로운 관계를 위하여
‘Body’ in Tokkaebi Folk-tales
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A body is the incarnation of a spirit and the body's action is the reflection of a spirit. Hence, it is self-evident that the body should be qualified as the subject to establish its ego identity. As we all know, most of western discourses, dealing with identities, are based on the projection of not 'us' but 'others' in logics. The 'otherness' is not accomplished merely in the area of history. It is a variety of ghosts and aliens very often appearing in movies or literary works that are the results of the othernesses positively or negatively projected by human beings. Most of aliens, gods and monsters are an evidence of disruption in the depth of a human mind. They reveal how we are disrupted between consciousness and unconsciousness, familiarity and unfamiliarity or the same and not the same. This article addressed the others' bodies generated by the results of that disruption and proceeded to examine the body-discourse. Especially, we looked into "Tokkaebi“, projected and disrupted from the body, or the subject of human beings. Through the process, we also examined the body-discourse in our Tokkaebi-tale as a whole. In the case of Tokkaebi, the body is specified by the subject into the otherness throughout all the bodies. Tokkaebi is in the relation of a human body and Mimesis, occasionally exposes the double self by hiding himself and is sometimes related in the old otherness, the Femininity. In the process of that, we could discuss the body-discourse in different viewpoint, so far mentioned in the discourse of modernity or the discourse of subject.
Abstract
A body is the incarnation of a spirit and the body's action is the reflection of a spirit. Hence, it is self-evident that the body should be qualified as the subject to establish its ego identity. As we all know, most of western discourses, dealing with identities, are based on the projection of not 'us' but 'others' in logics. The 'otherness' is not accomplished merely in the area of history. It is a variety of ghosts and aliens very often appearing in movies or literary works that are the results of the othernesses positively or negatively projected by human beings. Most of aliens, gods and monsters are an evidence of disruption in the depth of a human mind. They reveal how we are disrupted between consciousness and unconsciousness, familiarity and unfamiliarity or the same and not the same. This article addressed the others' bodies generated by the results of that disruption and proceeded to examine the body-discourse. Especially, we looked into "Tokkaebi“, projected and disrupted from the body, or the subject of human beings. Through the process, we also examined the body-discourse in our Tokkaebi-tale as a whole. In the case of Tokkaebi, the body is specified by the subject into the otherness throughout all the bodies. Tokkaebi is in the relation of a human body and Mimesis, occasionally exposes the double self by hiding himself and is sometimes related in the old otherness, the Femininity. In the process of that, we could discuss the body-discourse in different viewpoint, so far mentioned in the discourse of modernity or the discourse of subject.
참고문헌 (25)
- 강은해, "한국난타의 원형, 두두리 도깨비의 세계" (2003), 예림기획
- 강은해, "한국 도깨비담의 형성 변화와 구조에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1985
- 곽경윤, "몸 담론의 계보학을 통한 몸의 형태학 구성", 석사, pp.2004
- 김열규, "도깨비 날개를 달다" (1991), 춘추사
- 김열규, "도깨비와 귀신: 한국의 남과 여", 한국학논집, 30 (2003), 계명대 한국학연구원
- 민담과 신앙을 통해 본 도깨비의 세계, "김종대", 국학자료원, ~ (1997)
- 문기호, "타자성의 미학적 의의에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2000
- 문재원, "소통의 부재와 일탈적 욕망의 세계, in: 몸의 역사와 문학" (2002), 태학사
- 송효섭, "도깨비는 어떻게 생겨나는가", 한국학논집, 30 (2003), 계명대 한국학연구원
- 도깨비, 한국민속학대계 3, "이부영", 고려대민족문화연구소, ~ (1981)
- 이부영, "‘도깨비’의 심리학적 측면과 상징성", 한국학논집, 30 (2003), 계명대 한국학연구원
- 이성희, "타자의 미분성", 한국의 민속과 문화, 11 (2006), 경희대민속학연구소
- 이승환, "후기근대적 신체-주체의 부박함에 대하여, in: 몸의 인문학적 조명" (2005), 영남대 인문과학연구소
- 이진경, "역사의 공간, in: 소수성, 타자성, 외부성의 사건적 사유" (2010), 휴머니스트
- 임동권, "도깨비고, in: 한국민속학논고" (1971), 선명문화사
- 임석재, "한국의 도깨비" (1981), 열화당
- 장명훈, "현대소설에 나타난 몸 담론 연구", 석사, pp.2008
- 조광제, "타자론적인 몸철학의 길, in: 몸 또는 욕망의 사다리" (1999), 한길사
- 최기숙, "환상" (2003), 연세대 출판부
- 최기숙, "‘여성 원귀’의 환상적 서사화 방식을 통해 본 하위 주체의 타자화 과정과 문화적 위치-고전 소설에 나타난 ‘자살’과 ‘원귀’ 서사의 통계 분석을 바탕으로-", 고소설연구, (22), pp.325~355 (2006), 한국고소설학회
- 최인학, "도깨비의 민속학적 고찰, in: 한국민속학 연구" (1989), 인하대 출판부
- 구비문학대계, "한국정신문화연구원", 한국정신문화연구원 어문연구실, ~ (2002)
- 황인덕, "'형제투금형’ 설화의 한국민담적 변모", 민족문화연구, 21 (1988), 고대민족문화연구소
- 리처드 커니, "이방인, 신, 괴물" (2004), 개마고원
- 쯔베탕 토도로프, "바흐친:문학사회학과 대화 이론" (1987), 까치
