1920년대 상징의 두 양상 - 김우진의 문학의 ‘상징’ 언어에 나타난 ‘전일성’ 사상을 중심으로
Two aspects of the 1920's symbo - Focusing 'a complete whole character(전일성)' idea in 'symbol' language of U-Jin Kim's literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to consider two aspects of symbol in 1920s literature. First, central tendency of symbol in 1920s literature is seen in Park yung hee's style, when he working as a member The Baekjo (<白潮>), The PaeHeo(<廢墟>). Park's symbol escapes from reality, so it is transcendental and he had a attitude that escapes into a romantic idea. Kim Woo Jin, on the other hand, criticized this symbol, and thought that 'symbol' or 'symbolism' has a true meaning when it shows conflict and contradiction. So this study explanations Kim's thought in his symbol and symbolism language with 'Whole character(全一性)'. U-Jin Kim's 'a complete whole character‘ idea aimed at a harmony of the author's idea and language, mind and material and coexistence of traditional culture and Western culture. U-Jin Kim's 'symbol' and 'symbolism' well represent such 'a whole complete character' idea. In U-Jin Kim's literature, a language is the symbol to reproduce the idea. 'Symbolic words' has a significance when the language has relationship with its history and reality. In U-Jin Kim's literary work, the symbol appears in three aspects. That is, they are the 'external' symbol, the 'internal' one and the 'transcendental' one. The 'external' symbol represents the power oppresses the intellectuals(the artists) and the 'internal' one represents inner anguish of ego longing to free himself from it. Lastly, the 'transcendental' idea stands for the choice of life as an artist of Joseon born in the colonial period hoping to accept his destiny and enthusiastically participate in the reality. U-Jin Kim's symbolic sign of his literary work is the thing that his idea appeared in his literature as a language and we found his humane agony and sense of duty as an intellectual in this symbol of the language. Finally, the idea of his 'a complete whole character' overcame limitation of the Enlightenment literature and the literature of literary coterie magazine and recovered the sense of reality and the sense of balance of artistic value. Furthermore, it connotes the nature of resistance culture searching for the possibility of coexistence of culture in the imperialism period and the development of colonial culture from domination culture. In other words, 'a complete whole character' idea is the expression of his postcolonialism of political awareness.
Abstract
This study aims to consider two aspects of symbol in 1920s literature. First, central tendency of symbol in 1920s literature is seen in Park yung hee's style, when he working as a member The Baekjo (<白潮>), The PaeHeo(<廢墟>). Park's symbol escapes from reality, so it is transcendental and he had a attitude that escapes into a romantic idea. Kim Woo Jin, on the other hand, criticized this symbol, and thought that 'symbol' or 'symbolism' has a true meaning when it shows conflict and contradiction. So this study explanations Kim's thought in his symbol and symbolism language with 'Whole character(全一性)'. U-Jin Kim's 'a complete whole character‘ idea aimed at a harmony of the author's idea and language, mind and material and coexistence of traditional culture and Western culture. U-Jin Kim's 'symbol' and 'symbolism' well represent such 'a whole complete character' idea. In U-Jin Kim's literature, a language is the symbol to reproduce the idea. 'Symbolic words' has a significance when the language has relationship with its history and reality. In U-Jin Kim's literary work, the symbol appears in three aspects. That is, they are the 'external' symbol, the 'internal' one and the 'transcendental' one. The 'external' symbol represents the power oppresses the intellectuals(the artists) and the 'internal' one represents inner anguish of ego longing to free himself from it. Lastly, the 'transcendental' idea stands for the choice of life as an artist of Joseon born in the colonial period hoping to accept his destiny and enthusiastically participate in the reality. U-Jin Kim's symbolic sign of his literary work is the thing that his idea appeared in his literature as a language and we found his humane agony and sense of duty as an intellectual in this symbol of the language. Finally, the idea of his 'a complete whole character' overcame limitation of the Enlightenment literature and the literature of literary coterie magazine and recovered the sense of reality and the sense of balance of artistic value. Furthermore, it connotes the nature of resistance culture searching for the possibility of coexistence of culture in the imperialism period and the development of colonial culture from domination culture. In other words, 'a complete whole character' idea is the expression of his postcolonialism of political awareness.
참고문헌 (33)
- 서연호, "김우진 전집 Ⅰ,Ⅱ권" (2004), 연극과 인간
- "백조, 폐허, 폐허이후" (2004), 역락
- 김경란, "프랑스 상징주의" (2006), 연세대출판부
- 김경일, "여성의 근대, 근대의 여성" (2004), 푸른역사
- 김윤식, "한국근대문학사상사" (1984), 한길사
- 김용직, "한국근대시사 下" (1986), 학연사
- 박현수, "황금책갈피" (2006), 예옥
- 박현수, "현대시와 전통주의의 수사학" (2004), 서울대출판부
- 배봉기, "김우진과 채만식의 희곡연구" (1997), 태학사
- 서연호, "김우진" (2000), 건국대학교출판부
- 오세영, "문예사조" (1991), 고려원
- 유민영, "비운의 선구자 윤심덕과 김우진" (2009), 새문사
- 양승국, "김우진 그의 삶과 문학" (1998), 태학사
- 이은경, "수산 김우진 연구" (2004), 월인
- 조동일, "한국문학사상사시론" (2003), 지식산업사
- Edward W. Side, "오리엔탈리즘" (2005), 문예출판사
- Edward W. Side, "문화와 제국주의" (2004), 교보문고
- Edward W. Side, "저항의 인문학" (2008), 마티
- Robert J.C. Young, "경성대학교 출판부" (2008)
- Tzvetan Todorov, "상징의 이론" (1995), 한국문화사
- Umberto Eco, "기호학과 언어 철학" (2009), 열린책들
- 곽명숙, "1920년대 초기시의 미적 초월성과 상징주의", 한국문화, (40), pp.101~125 (2007), 규장각한국학연구원
- 권명국, "상징의 의미 연구", 어문학, (60) (1997)
- 김도경, "김우진 문학론 연구 - 재현의 문제를 중심으로 -", 우리말글, 47, pp.391~411 (2009), 우리말글학회
- 박현수, "1920년대 상징의 탄생과 숭고한 ‘애인’", 한국현대문학연구, (18), pp.195~226 (2005), 한국현대문학회
- 손영신, "김우진 희곡 연구-표현주의 희곡을 중심으로", 성신어문학, 8 (1996)
- 손화숙, "김우진 시 연구", 어문논집, 33 (1994)
- 양근애, "김우진의 「난파」에 나타난 예술 활용과 그 의미", 국제어문, (43), pp.329~359 (2008), 국제어문학회
- 유민영, "초성 김우진 연구 下", 한양대논문집, 5 (1971)
- 정갑준, "「파사(婆娑)」,「난파(難破)」,「산돼지」 속에 나타난 표현주의 기법연구", 시학과 언어학, (17), pp.139~166 (2009), 시학과언어학회
- 정대성, "한국 근대시의 먼동: 水山 金祐鎭의 漢詩―전통의 변용과 창출, 전통과 근대의 변증법―", 민족문화논총, (31), pp.541~587 (2005), 민족문화연구소
- 주일선, "상징은 의미동일성의 재현인가?- 드 만의 알레고리 개념과의 비교를 통하여 살펴본 괴테의 상징개념", 카프카 연구, (16), pp.205~226 (2006), 한국카프카학회
- 주현식, "폭발의 드라마, 폭발하는 무대 - 김우진의 <난파>와 표현주의", 한국극예술연구, (29), pp.11~45 (2009), 한국극예술학회
