형식주의 비평적 관점에서 본 『무정』
Moo Jung from the View on Critical Perspective of Formalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper looks into Moo Jung from the formalistic point of view. Firstly, the paper looks through in a way of aesthetic configuration if the main idea of Moo Jung is related to the image that new critics carefully observe. Then, it observes conflicts in the novel which is the kernel of the narrative structure focuses on relationships between the character and the times, and that of among characters. Lastly, this paper examines how the symbol which plays an important role as expressing the main idea contributes to the internal meaning of the novel. Moo Jung is structured as a competitive form that the surface theme competes with the internal theme; this structure gives tension to the work. The novel’s narration crosses between a pure image and a regrettable vindictive spirit’s image; those images are opposed to each other. The pure image that is expressed by Lee Hyung-sik and Kim Sun-hyung shows the surface theme while the regrettable vindictive spirit’s image that is expressed by Park Young-chae leads the internal theme and forms the kernel of this work. On the surface, the surface theme led by a pure and vivid image seems to be the mainstream of Moo Jung however, the real one is the internal theme that is led by Park Young-chae’s regrettable vindictive spirit’s image. This fact even attracts readers more. The main conflict appears in Moo Jung is a love triangle. Lee Young-sik, a hero of the novel, smarts between Park Young-chae – obligation for old days – and Kim Sun-hyung – benefit for now –and this forms the main conflict. The next conflict that is found in the work is that of main characters that represent the time they live: the death of Park the officer and his sons, suicide of Wal-hwa, the conflict in Young-chae herself who is a gi-saeng or not, the trouble of Byung-wook, and the trouble of Byung-wook’s brother. These conflicts prop up the main conflict, and make internal meaning of the novel more rich and meaningful. In addition, the conflict result from irony shows in the novel: the frustration on patriots’ (Park the office and his companions) wills of accomplishing national salvation versus the higher reality of people who only seek profits and pleasure. While patriots’ wills end with the frustration, people who only seek profits and pleasure all rise to higher social positions or win in reality. The formation of irony is done by winning of falsehood in a battle of truth and falsehood, and of existence in a battle of reason and existence. Irony occurs in the aspect of the formation in personality by Lee Hyung-sik; he is originally a weak character, but eventually he becomes an accomplisher of strong will for national salvation. Throughout this, heterogeneity between the surface theme and the internal theme shows as a conflict; surface themes are establishment of education in the country and the will of enlightenment, and internal themes are lamentation of Young-chae and grief from the loss of her own country. Finally, the paper discusses how a flood relates to the main theme of the novel on the aspect of symbol.
Abstract
This paper looks into Moo Jung from the formalistic point of view. Firstly, the paper looks through in a way of aesthetic configuration if the main idea of Moo Jung is related to the image that new critics carefully observe. Then, it observes conflicts in the novel which is the kernel of the narrative structure focuses on relationships between the character and the times, and that of among characters. Lastly, this paper examines how the symbol which plays an important role as expressing the main idea contributes to the internal meaning of the novel. Moo Jung is structured as a competitive form that the surface theme competes with the internal theme; this structure gives tension to the work. The novel’s narration crosses between a pure image and a regrettable vindictive spirit’s image; those images are opposed to each other. The pure image that is expressed by Lee Hyung-sik and Kim Sun-hyung shows the surface theme while the regrettable vindictive spirit’s image that is expressed by Park Young-chae leads the internal theme and forms the kernel of this work. On the surface, the surface theme led by a pure and vivid image seems to be the mainstream of Moo Jung however, the real one is the internal theme that is led by Park Young-chae’s regrettable vindictive spirit’s image. This fact even attracts readers more. The main conflict appears in Moo Jung is a love triangle. Lee Young-sik, a hero of the novel, smarts between Park Young-chae – obligation for old days – and Kim Sun-hyung – benefit for now –and this forms the main conflict. The next conflict that is found in the work is that of main characters that represent the time they live: the death of Park the officer and his sons, suicide of Wal-hwa, the conflict in Young-chae herself who is a gi-saeng or not, the trouble of Byung-wook, and the trouble of Byung-wook’s brother. These conflicts prop up the main conflict, and make internal meaning of the novel more rich and meaningful. In addition, the conflict result from irony shows in the novel: the frustration on patriots’ (Park the office and his companions) wills of accomplishing national salvation versus the higher reality of people who only seek profits and pleasure. While patriots’ wills end with the frustration, people who only seek profits and pleasure all rise to higher social positions or win in reality. The formation of irony is done by winning of falsehood in a battle of truth and falsehood, and of existence in a battle of reason and existence. Irony occurs in the aspect of the formation in personality by Lee Hyung-sik; he is originally a weak character, but eventually he becomes an accomplisher of strong will for national salvation. Throughout this, heterogeneity between the surface theme and the internal theme shows as a conflict; surface themes are establishment of education in the country and the will of enlightenment, and internal themes are lamentation of Young-chae and grief from the loss of her own country. Finally, the paper discusses how a flood relates to the main theme of the novel on the aspect of symbol.
참고문헌 (14)
- 이광수, "무정" (1992), 문학과 사상사
- 김동인, "춘원연구", 동인전집, 8, pp.495~511 (1968)
- 김윤식, "한국근대작가론고", pp.19~ (1974), 일지사
- 문순태, "한국문학에 나타난 한의 연구", 석사, pp.1982
- 신춘호, "문학이란 무엇인가", pp.67~ (1995), 집문당
- 이보영, "식민지적조건의 극복―『무정』론, 식민지시대 문학론", pp.175~181 (1984), 도서출판 필그린
- 이상섭, "형식주의 비평의 방법, 문학비평의 방법과 실제", pp.211~ (1983), 동천사
- 한승옥, "이광수연구", pp.45~47 (1984), 선일문화사
- 그래엄 하프, "비평론", pp.31~ (1982), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 르네 웰렉, "문학의 이론", pp.255~ (1975), 신구문화사
- 빅토르 어얼리치, "러시아 형식주의", pp.227~ (1985), 문학과 지성사
- L. Guerin, "A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature", pp.119~ (1966), New York: Happer Row, Publisher's
- Lois Tyson, "New Criticism", pp.120~ (1999), CRITICAL THEORY TODAY, Garland Publishing, Inc
- X. J. Kennedy, "LITERATURE", pp.625~ (1995), Harper Collins College Publishers
