본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

욕망의 윤리적 소통 - 이청준의 소설과 소설론에 대한 인간학적 접근

Moral Communication in a Desire - Lee Cheong-jun's Novel and Theory of Novel

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The process that a writer worries about 'why it is written' starts from the elemental question in self-reflection like 'what literature is.' What we worry about 'why we live' is the principle similar to what is based on the epistemological thinking about 'what a human being is.' As Lee Cheong-jun is a writer who concentrated on pursuing a writer's mentality inside and outside text and on inquiring into the essence of art, in the spectrum in his novel, he himself becomes the main body of inquiry, thereby dimensionally showing the world of deeply searching for a problem about the philosophical existence in writing itself. This characteristic is presented intensively to a modifier called “theory of novel written by novel” that is attached to his novel. The identity in writing will be able to be found from understanding a writer's elemental psychology. Also, a writer's elemental psychology functions as a path of understanding mechanism of narrative discourse. A writer's elemental psychology, which is mentioned here, is completely unrelated to what clears up complex or trauma of a character in a novel. Its research frame needs to be not psychoanalysis, but anthropology. The western philosophy has focused on the absolute truth. Contrary to it, the oriental philosophy is based on self-culture through the theory of human nature, thereby being able to be seen to be strong in the anthropological character. Especially, Mengtzu says that a reason why a person becomes a person is just a person's true nature. This has the thinking structure that has consistent context with what a reason why a writer becomes a writer may be a writer's true nature and what a reason why a novel becomes a novel may be true nature in a novel. This study explores the fictitious self-consciousness in Lee Cheong-jun's novel through Confucianism, which can be said to be representative of the oriental anthropology, especially, through Mengtzu's thought. Given comparing 'Benevolence(仁)' and 'Righteousness(義)', which are concepts of Confucianism, the principle of a human being's life can be known in the middle of it. As the benevolence(仁) is characterized by the mind of feeling compassion, this is called a case that self and others become oneness. And, as righteousness(義) is characterized by the mind of being shy and angry, this indicates a case that self's independent personality is argued while self and others are contradicted strictly. The retaliatory spirit, on which Lee Cheong-jun mentions as a motive for writing in Dominance and Liberation, corresponds just to the latter. This retaliatory spirit turns directly into the curing desire in Fool and Ass. Characters, who write a new novel on own fault in a novel, do write as part of making an excuse in order to console the wounded soul and to make self right. By the way, its writing is a great excuse of giving energy that can proceed with making a life again in the unreasonable world. Its retaliation is the revenge toward the world that makes me annoying, thereby reaching affirmation that denies again what is denied. If this affirmation moves to others, it comes to enter the stage of moral communication. In the novel titled Door of Time, the conclusion that the character, who had been indifferent to realistic problem, proceeds with finally advancing to a way of adversity oneself in order to be assimilated with boat people in South East Asia suggests moral prospect. Here is revealed the mature state in true humanity that is pursued by benevolence(仁). Even Levinas's argument, on which only self of freeing from oneself leads to being able to advance to the future of acquiring eternal time, is suitable for this. Art is dreamed of coming to be able to share sympathy with mankind in the world, by which an individual's desire is sublimed through moral communication. This dream can be realized through the proposition that our psychological disease, wound, or retaliatory spirit is resembled as much as being able to understand each other and to be understood. Ultimately, writing allows the world to be cured beyond the healing of individual existence in a human being. That is because a story is a form that is completed through connection and communication with others.

Abstract

The process that a writer worries about 'why it is written' starts from the elemental question in self-reflection like 'what literature is.' What we worry about 'why we live' is the principle similar to what is based on the epistemological thinking about 'what a human being is.' As Lee Cheong-jun is a writer who concentrated on pursuing a writer's mentality inside and outside text and on inquiring into the essence of art, in the spectrum in his novel, he himself becomes the main body of inquiry, thereby dimensionally showing the world of deeply searching for a problem about the philosophical existence in writing itself. This characteristic is presented intensively to a modifier called “theory of novel written by novel” that is attached to his novel. The identity in writing will be able to be found from understanding a writer's elemental psychology. Also, a writer's elemental psychology functions as a path of understanding mechanism of narrative discourse. A writer's elemental psychology, which is mentioned here, is completely unrelated to what clears up complex or trauma of a character in a novel. Its research frame needs to be not psychoanalysis, but anthropology. The western philosophy has focused on the absolute truth. Contrary to it, the oriental philosophy is based on self-culture through the theory of human nature, thereby being able to be seen to be strong in the anthropological character. Especially, Mengtzu says that a reason why a person becomes a person is just a person's true nature. This has the thinking structure that has consistent context with what a reason why a writer becomes a writer may be a writer's true nature and what a reason why a novel becomes a novel may be true nature in a novel. This study explores the fictitious self-consciousness in Lee Cheong-jun's novel through Confucianism, which can be said to be representative of the oriental anthropology, especially, through Mengtzu's thought. Given comparing 'Benevolence(仁)' and 'Righteousness(義)', which are concepts of Confucianism, the principle of a human being's life can be known in the middle of it. As the benevolence(仁) is characterized by the mind of feeling compassion, this is called a case that self and others become oneness. And, as righteousness(義) is characterized by the mind of being shy and angry, this indicates a case that self's independent personality is argued while self and others are contradicted strictly. The retaliatory spirit, on which Lee Cheong-jun mentions as a motive for writing in Dominance and Liberation, corresponds just to the latter. This retaliatory spirit turns directly into the curing desire in Fool and Ass. Characters, who write a new novel on own fault in a novel, do write as part of making an excuse in order to console the wounded soul and to make self right. By the way, its writing is a great excuse of giving energy that can proceed with making a life again in the unreasonable world. Its retaliation is the revenge toward the world that makes me annoying, thereby reaching affirmation that denies again what is denied. If this affirmation moves to others, it comes to enter the stage of moral communication. In the novel titled Door of Time, the conclusion that the character, who had been indifferent to realistic problem, proceeds with finally advancing to a way of adversity oneself in order to be assimilated with boat people in South East Asia suggests moral prospect. Here is revealed the mature state in true humanity that is pursued by benevolence(仁). Even Levinas's argument, on which only self of freeing from oneself leads to being able to advance to the future of acquiring eternal time, is suitable for this. Art is dreamed of coming to be able to share sympathy with mankind in the world, by which an individual's desire is sublimed through moral communication. This dream can be realized through the proposition that our psychological disease, wound, or retaliatory spirit is resembled as much as being able to understand each other and to be understood. Ultimately, writing allows the world to be cured beyond the healing of individual existence in a human being. That is because a story is a form that is completed through connection and communication with others.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 이청준, "지배와 해방. in: 자서전들 쓰십시다" (2000), 열림원
  2. 이청준, "병신과 머저리. in: 병신과 머저리" (2001), 열림원
  3. 이청준, "시간의 문. in: 시간의 문" (2000), 열림원
  4. 강영안, "타인의 얼굴 ― 레비나스의 철학" (2005), 문학과지성사
  5. 권오룡, "이청준 깊이 읽기" (1999), 문학과지성사
  6. 김현, "이청준론" (1991), 삼인행
  7. 맹자, "맹자" (2007), 을유문화사
  8. 이상은, "중국철학" (1998), 예문서원
  9. 게오르그 루카치, "소설의 이론" (1998), 심설당
  10. 루시앙 골드만, "소설사회학을 위하여" (1982), 청하
  11. 알베르 까뮈, "반항하는 인간" (2003), 책세상
  12. 김교선, "소설로 쓴 소설론", 현대문학, (201) (1971)
  13. 송기섭, "<병신과 머저리>의 내면성과 아이러니", 현대소설연구, 42, pp.159~186 (2009), 한국현대소설학회
  14. 유철상, "복수와 해방의 변증법적 화해", 현대문학이론연구, 16 (2001), 현대문학이론학회
  15. 이승준, "이청준 소설에 나타나는 ‘자기 실종’ 연구", 현대소설연구, (30), pp.165~184 (2006), 한국현대소설학회
  16. 이현석, "이청준 소설의 주제화에 있어서 윤리성의 문제", 한국현대문학연구, (24), pp.469~495 (2008), 한국현대문학회
  17. 최진석, "이청준 소설의 도가적 해석", 한국문학이론과 비평, 8 (2000), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  18. 한순미, "근대 재현적 주체의 죽음과 탈주의 욕망", 국어국문학, (136), pp.385~414 (2004), 국어국문학회
  19. 오르한 파묵, "아버지의 여행 가방 - 노벨문학상 수상 연설", 문학동네, 50 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)