본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 근대기 역사학자 미카미 산지의 역사관과 교육 -『다이헤이키(太平記)』의 세계를 중심으로-

Historical View and Education of Mikami Sanji, the historian of Japanese Modern Times - Focused on the World of 『Taiheiki』-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류철학

초록

This thesis is to review the story about how the study and education were formed by the intellectuals of the times centered on the historical view and educational view of Mikami Sanji(三上参次), the historian representing Japanese modern times. The previous studies have evaluated Mikami Sanji as the figure who was suppressed ideologically owing to South and North Dynasty Legitimacy. However, he supported the compatible theory of South and North Dynasty based on the historical view of positivism, but maintained the position that the subjects should not argue the legitimacy of the imperial line, and emphasized the education of filial piety instead of the legitimacy theory. And the incident over South and North Dynasty Legitimacy was the reproduction of the world of 『Taiheiki(太平記)』repeated from the pre-modern times, that is, the issue of the repeated structure between the royal subjects centered on Kusunoki Masashige and the enemy of the royalty represented by Aishikaga Dakawooji. Therefore, this paper argues that Mikami Sanji also, after the incident over 1911 South and North Dynasty Legitimacy Issue, used Kusunoki Masashige as a representative royalist in the education positively, and the sense as a royal subject himself led to the worship to Meiji Emperor.

Abstract

This thesis is to review the story about how the study and education were formed by the intellectuals of the times centered on the historical view and educational view of Mikami Sanji(三上参次), the historian representing Japanese modern times. The previous studies have evaluated Mikami Sanji as the figure who was suppressed ideologically owing to South and North Dynasty Legitimacy. However, he supported the compatible theory of South and North Dynasty based on the historical view of positivism, but maintained the position that the subjects should not argue the legitimacy of the imperial line, and emphasized the education of filial piety instead of the legitimacy theory. And the incident over South and North Dynasty Legitimacy was the reproduction of the world of 『Taiheiki(太平記)』repeated from the pre-modern times, that is, the issue of the repeated structure between the royal subjects centered on Kusunoki Masashige and the enemy of the royalty represented by Aishikaga Dakawooji. Therefore, this paper argues that Mikami Sanji also, after the incident over 1911 South and North Dynasty Legitimacy Issue, used Kusunoki Masashige as a representative royalist in the education positively, and the sense as a royal subject himself led to the worship to Meiji Emperor.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "政府原案のまま厖大予算愈よ成立", 大阪朝日新聞, ~ (1934)
  2. "時勢の変化", ~ (1911)
  3. "南北朝対立問題 国定教科書の失態", 読売新聞, ~ (1911)
  4. 久米邦武, "神道は祭天の古俗", 史学会雑誌 (1981)
  5. 国史研究会, "岩波講座日本歴史, 8" (1935), 岩波書店
  6. 後藤秀穂, "問題は尚解決されず", ~ (1911)
  7. 重野安, "大日本史を論じ歴史の体裁に及ぶ", 東京学士会院雑誌, 3(1886) (1886)
  8. 政友会, "正閏断案国体之擁護" (1911), 東京堂
  9. 東京楠公会, "嗚呼忠臣" (1935), 東京楠公会
  10. 三上参次 高津鍬三郎他, "日本文学史" (1890), 金港堂
  11. 三上参, "鎌倉文明史論" (1909), 三省堂
  12. 三上参, "教科書に於る南北正閏問題の由来" (1911)
  13. 三上参次, "忠孝一致, In 忠経講義" (1923), 文章院
  14. 池田智文, "南北朝正閏問題」再考ー近代「国史学」の思想的問題としてー", 日本史研究, (528) (2006)
  15. 伊藤大介, "南北朝正閏問題再考", 宮城歴史科学研究, (45) (1998)
  16. 岩井忠熊, "日本近代史学の形成, In 岩波講座日本歴史22(別冊1)" (1963), 岩波書店
  17. 大久保利, "嵐の中の百年", 勁草書房 (1952)
  18. 小山常, "天皇機関説と国民教育" (1989), アカデミア出版会
  19. 五味淵典嗣, "この国で書くこと", 芸文研究, (79) (2000)
  20. 高橋勝, "三上参次の進講と昭和天皇: 明治天皇の聖徳をめぐって" (1995), 明治聖徳記念学会
  21. 1竹内光浩, "久米邦武事件", pp.732~ (2011), 歴史評論
  22. 田中史郎, "喜田貞吉の「歴史教育=応用史学」論の性格とその歴史的位置, In 社会科の史的探求" (1999), 西日本法規出版
  23. 廣木尚, "南北朝正閏問題と歴史学の展開", 歴史評論, 4(740) (2011)
  24. 兵藤裕, "太平記<よみ>の可能性" (2005), 講談社学術文庫
  25. 尾藤正英, "正明論と名分論, In 近代日本の国家と思想" (1979), 三省堂
  26. 宮沢剛, "「吉野葛」論", 語文論叢, (199)
  27. 渡辺幾治, "明治史研究" (1934), 楽浪書院
  28. 渡辺善雄, "大逆事件․南北朝正閏問題", 別冊国文学, 37 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)