역사기술과 인식의 다층성- 러일 전쟁과 동해해전을 중심으로-
Historical description and Multilayered characteristics of recognition : focusing on Russo-Japanese War and naval battle in East sea
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Russo-Japanese War is an event which world-wide gives a shock. From the Korean standpoint, the Russo-Japanese War is seen as one connected to Korean-Japanese Agreement(November 17, 1905) and Annexation of Korea by Japan(August 22, 1910)This paper attempts to restructure an epistemology background regarding the Russo-Japanese War. In generally, It is though that it occurred in the result which was brought in the collusion of the Russian going south strategy and the Japanese continent invasion one. I agree with this statement to some extent, it should look into the background, that is, the Russian network, and Btitsh and Japanese network. The battle which decides the destiny of the Russo-Japanese War was the naval battle in East Sea. (From 1905 May 27th on the 28th) Though this battle, Japan becames in genuine nation of empire state. Therefore, for the perspective of two subjects of this naval battle in East Sea, it is necessary to clarify its understanding of recognition. Being formed commonly to the inter-subjectivity of the Russo-Japanese War, the description of naval battle in East Sea, along with the explanation, leads to this event. Many observers and others who sae and heard this war, by the way, reported it, irrespective of its subjects. It is they that one war correspondents. Only if we all them spectators, it could happened to be misunderstood. But where as spectators see it as a contingency, the observers 야 it as an inevitability. Therefore, I intend to grasp the descriptions which observers understood the war by observing.
Abstract
The Russo-Japanese War is an event which world-wide gives a shock. From the Korean standpoint, the Russo-Japanese War is seen as one connected to Korean-Japanese Agreement(November 17, 1905) and Annexation of Korea by Japan(August 22, 1910)This paper attempts to restructure an epistemology background regarding the Russo-Japanese War. In generally, It is though that it occurred in the result which was brought in the collusion of the Russian going south strategy and the Japanese continent invasion one. I agree with this statement to some extent, it should look into the background, that is, the Russian network, and Btitsh and Japanese network. The battle which decides the destiny of the Russo-Japanese War was the naval battle in East Sea. (From 1905 May 27th on the 28th) Though this battle, Japan becames in genuine nation of empire state. Therefore, for the perspective of two subjects of this naval battle in East Sea, it is necessary to clarify its understanding of recognition. Being formed commonly to the inter-subjectivity of the Russo-Japanese War, the description of naval battle in East Sea, along with the explanation, leads to this event. Many observers and others who sae and heard this war, by the way, reported it, irrespective of its subjects. It is they that one war correspondents. Only if we all them spectators, it could happened to be misunderstood. But where as spectators see it as a contingency, the observers 야 it as an inevitability. Therefore, I intend to grasp the descriptions which observers understood the war by observing.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김용구, "거문도와 블라디보스토크" (2009), 서강대학교 출판부
- 고영자, "러일전쟁과 대한제국" (2007), 탱자출판사
- 루돌프 차벨, "독일인 부부의 한국 신혼여행" (2009), 살림
- 이경희, "러일전쟁과 대한제국" (2011), 제이앤씨
- 정재정, "러일전쟁의 세기" (2010), 도서출판 소화
- 앵거스 해밀튼, "러일 전쟁 당시 조선에 대한 보고서" (2010), 살림
- 최덕수, "조약으로 본 한국근대사" (2011), 열린 책들
- 잭 런던, "조선사람 엿보기(1904년 러일전쟁 종군기)" (2011), 한울
- 폴 케네디, "강대국의 흥망" (1988), 한국경제신문사
- 현광호, "대한제국과 러시아 그리고 일본" (2007), 선인
- 한승훈, "을사늑약을 전후한 영국의 대한정책", 韓國史學報, (30), pp.387~421 (2008), 고려사학회
- Alexei Nikolaievich Kuropatkin, "러일전쟁(Guerra Ruso-Japonesa)" (2007), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 軍令部, "明治三十七八年海戦史 上下" (1934)
- 講談会, "日本海学の新世紀, In 日本海学の新世紀" (2001), 角川書店
