본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on academic text writing education for foreign students

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Writing is considered to be more difficult as it is an area that requires ability to draw new conclusions based on analysis rather than analytical ability. Compared to speaking in the same expression category, writing is the most complex area as it assesses ability to utilize written language, sophisticated grammatical ability. Speaking is understood and evaluated holistically, considering spontaneousness and focusing on the content. On the other hand, since the result of writing lasts longer, structural and expressional details can be assessed. Moreover, academic texts are specialized and have authoritative and formal written style, different from colloquial language. Therefore, for foreign students who learned Korean as second language, academic text is difficult to master. Consequently, making students understand the qualities important in Korean writing and making them to understand and use typical characteristics of academic text and vocabulary, grammatical, stylistic characteristics of academic text is important in teaching academic text composition to foreign students. It is highly likely the students have been trained in their native language to select content and generate topic and the ability would not show drastic difference between target and native language. Thus Korean composition education should focus on “structuring” level– expanding sentence to paragraph and structuring text cohesively—and “expression” level —constructing sentences. As this research has been conducted to develop pedagogy of academic text writing for foreign students, it focuses more on the general understanding of subject of writing and typology of academic text and provides limited direction for education. Detailed method could be established after based on fundamental understanding provided by this research.

Abstract

Writing is considered to be more difficult as it is an area that requires ability to draw new conclusions based on analysis rather than analytical ability. Compared to speaking in the same expression category, writing is the most complex area as it assesses ability to utilize written language, sophisticated grammatical ability. Speaking is understood and evaluated holistically, considering spontaneousness and focusing on the content. On the other hand, since the result of writing lasts longer, structural and expressional details can be assessed. Moreover, academic texts are specialized and have authoritative and formal written style, different from colloquial language. Therefore, for foreign students who learned Korean as second language, academic text is difficult to master. Consequently, making students understand the qualities important in Korean writing and making them to understand and use typical characteristics of academic text and vocabulary, grammatical, stylistic characteristics of academic text is important in teaching academic text composition to foreign students. It is highly likely the students have been trained in their native language to select content and generate topic and the ability would not show drastic difference between target and native language. Thus Korean composition education should focus on “structuring” level– expanding sentence to paragraph and structuring text cohesively—and “expression” level —constructing sentences. As this research has been conducted to develop pedagogy of academic text writing for foreign students, it focuses more on the general understanding of subject of writing and typology of academic text and provides limited direction for education. Detailed method could be established after based on fundamental understanding provided by this research.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Clanchy, "How to Write Essays" (1992), Longman Cheshire
  2. van Dijk, T. A., "Textlinguistics" (1995), Mineumsa
  3. Kim Bong-Sun, "Korean Language Education and Text Structure" (2002), Seoul National Unicersity Press
  4. 金正子, "쓰기 評價 方法 연구 : 評價基準의 設定과 그 適用을 중심으로", 석사, 국어교육학, pp.1992
  5. 김정숙, "내용 지식 구성을 위한 학문 목적 한국어 쓰기 교육 방안", 한국어교육, 20(1), pp.23~44 (2009), 국제한국어교육학회
  6. Kim Jeong-Suk, "Research on the Design of Korean Language Curriculum for Academic Purposes", Korean language education, 11(2), pp.1~19 (2000)
  7. 김영미, "학문목적 한국어 쓰기교육을 위한장르 분류와 분석의 틀 - 장르기반 접근법 적용을 위하여 -", 텍스트언어학, 29, pp.113~141 (2010), 한국텍스트언어학회
  8. 이해영, "외국인 대학원생의 학문적 구두 발표 장르 분석-한국인 대학원생 및 학문 목적 한국어 학습자의 구두 발표와 비교하여-", 이중언어학, (37), pp.133~174 (2008), 이중언어학회
  9. Moon Young-jin, "Reading Korean Modern Prose and Writing" (2000), Somyeon Press
  10. 신지연, "인문학 학술텍스트의 담화 특징", 텍스트언어학, 35, pp.123~144 (2013), 한국텍스트언어학회
  11. Shin Ji yeon, "A Basic Study for the Standardization of the Korean Vocabulary Education in Southeast Asia", International Review of Korean Studies, 13(1), pp.35~54 (2016)
  12. 신명선, "국어 학술텍스트에 드러난 헤지(Hedge) 표현에 대한 연구", 배달말, (38), pp.151~180 (2006), 배달말학회
  13. Basic Research for the Evaluation of Korean Language Proficiency, "Tchang sowon", National Institute of Korean Language, ~ (2012)
  14. Nancy Bonvillain, "Sociolinguistics of Culture and Communication" (2002), Hankook Publishin Company
  15. Won Jin-Suk, "Education theory on essay writing" (1995), Pagijong Press
  16. Won Jin-Suk, "The Study on Korean Proficiency Assessment", Korean Linguistics, 1, pp.27~315 (1995)
  17. 유해준, "학문 목적 한국어 교육을 위한 기본 어휘 선정에 관한 연구 : 인문·사회 영역을 중심으로", 석사, 교과교육학, pp.2007

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)