의사소통 훈련의 현실과 한계 － 의사소통 훈련 프로그램 개발을 위한 예비적 고찰 －
Reality and Limits of Communication Training.－Preliminary Reflections for the Development of Communication Training Programmes
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Linguistic－communicative ability is one of the core qualities for social activity. There are numerous literatures and training programmes to improve this ability. As the proverb “practice makes perfect” implies, the improvement of linguistic－communicative ability through practice and training is the prerequisite of these programmes. First, we look at the actuality of communication training in order to see the origin of this myth by means of Brons－Albert's research. This study shows that the effects of practical rhetoric communication training are slighter then we had expected. Thereafter we deal with the limitations of communication training. This theme leads to the reflection of the object of communication training and training methode. An initial limitation is that the object of communication training is clarified in the process of the consideration of automation and deautomation of linguistic－communicative ability and technique. A second restriction results from applications of Monitor Theory to filtering the objet of communication training. This article offers theoretical reflections for the linguistically meaningful development of communication training programmes.
Abstract
Linguistic－communicative ability is one of the core qualities for social activity. There are numerous literatures and training programmes to improve this ability. As the proverb “practice makes perfect” implies, the improvement of linguistic－communicative ability through practice and training is the prerequisite of these programmes. First, we look at the actuality of communication training in order to see the origin of this myth by means of Brons－Albert's research. This study shows that the effects of practical rhetoric communication training are slighter then we had expected. Thereafter we deal with the limitations of communication training. This theme leads to the reflection of the object of communication training and training methode. An initial limitation is that the object of communication training is clarified in the process of the consideration of automation and deautomation of linguistic－communicative ability and technique. A second restriction results from applications of Monitor Theory to filtering the objet of communication training. This article offers theoretical reflections for the linguistically meaningful development of communication training programmes.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김한영, "언어본능. 마음은 어떻게 언어를 만드나(S. Pinker, Language Instinct. How the mind creates language, 1995)" (2004), 서울：도서출판 소소
- 박이도, "세계화 시대의 모국어습득과 외국어학습" (2000), 서울：한국문화사
- 서수현 외, "생물언어학과 Chomsky 이해" (2007), 서울：동인
- 안정오(역), "이차 언어 습득(W. Klein, Zweitspracherwerb, 1984)" (1994), 서울：한국문화사
- 진정근, "응용대화연구와 그 활용분야", 독일어문학, 32, pp.251~270 (2006)
- 플루타르코스, "플루타르크 영웅전", 서울：범우사, 6 (1994)
- Antos, G., "Grundlagen einer Theorie des Formulierens. Texther－ stellung in geschriebener und gesprochener Sprache" (1982), Tubingen：Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Antos, G., "Demosthenes oder：Uber die ‘Verbesserung der Kommunikation’. Moglichkeiten und Grenzen sprachlich kommunikativer Verhaltensanderung", in Fiehler R. Sucharowski W. (Hg.) Kommunikationsberatung und Kommunikationstraining (1992), Anwendungs fel
- Brons－Albert, R., "Auswirkungen von Kommunikationstraining auf das Gesprachsverhalten" (1995), Tubingen：Gunter Narr Verlag
- Coulmas, F., "Rezeptives Sprachverhalten. Eine theoretische Studie uber Faktoren des sprachlichen Verstehensprozesses" (1977), Hamburg：Helmut Buske Verlag
- Fiehler, R., "Kann man Kommunikation lehren? Zur Veranderbarkeit von Kommunikationsverhalten durch Kommunikationstrainings, in G. Brunner·R. Fiehler·W. Kindt (Hg.), Angewandte Diskursforschung", Band 2：Methoden und Anwendungsgebiete, 2, pp.18~35 (2002), Radolfz
- Fiehler,R, "Spracherwerb im Erwachsenenalter, in G. Rickheit & Th. Hermann & W. Deutsch (Hg.), Psycholinguistik. Ein internationales Handbuch. 812－819, Berlin, New York：Walter de Gruyter", ~ (2003)
- Hartung, M., "Wie lasst sich Gesprachskompetenz wirksam und nachhaltig vermitteln? Ein Erfahrungsbericht aus der Praxis, in M. Becker－Mrotzek & G. Brunner (Hg.), Analyse und Vermittlung von Gesprachskompetenz. 47－66, Radolfzell：Verlag fur Gesprach", 47~66 (2004)
- Kemper, S. et al., "Life－span changes to adults' language：Effects of memory and genre", Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, pp.49~66 (1989)
- Langner, M., "Tatigkeitstheorie－Sprechtatigkeitstheorie", Deutsche Sprache, 12, pp.110~140 (1984)
- Leont‘ev, A. A., "Psycholinguistik und Sprachunterricht" (1974), Stuttgart：Kohlhammer
- Obler, L. K, "Language Beyond Childhood, in J.B. Gleason ed., The Development of Language", pp.420~449 (1993), New York：Macmillan Publishing Company
- Schulz von Thun, F., "Miteinander reden. Storungen und Klarungen. Allgemeine Psychologie der Kommunikation. Reinbek bei Hamburg：Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag", ~ (1981)