공통 과학 교과서의 텍스트성 연구 - 텍스트의 의도성과 용인성을 중심으로 -
A Study on Textuality of science textbooks: Embodying Intentionality and acceptability.
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aims of the paper is to examine textuality of science textbooks based on the role of textbooks in science education. Textbooks have been written according to guidelines for effective learning. We consider the importance of writers’ intentionality and learners’ acceptability in text production and use. We attempt to analyze the textual structure and language used in science textbooks and how they affect the embodiement of writers’ intentionality and learners’ acceptability. As the first step, we offer general characteristics of the textbook as a text. Secondly, we argue that educational policy and discourse community rules are critical factors in embodying the intentionality into the text structure in science textbooks. Thirdly, we examine the way of embodying acceptability into text structure and language uses,grammatical forms of predicate, style and metaphor in science textbook.
Abstract
The aims of the paper is to examine textuality of science textbooks based on the role of textbooks in science education. Textbooks have been written according to guidelines for effective learning. We consider the importance of writers’ intentionality and learners’ acceptability in text production and use. We attempt to analyze the textual structure and language used in science textbooks and how they affect the embodiement of writers’ intentionality and learners’ acceptability. As the first step, we offer general characteristics of the textbook as a text. Secondly, we argue that educational policy and discourse community rules are critical factors in embodying the intentionality into the text structure in science textbooks. Thirdly, we examine the way of embodying acceptability into text structure and language uses,grammatical forms of predicate, style and metaphor in science textbook.
참고문헌 (40)
- 그로스 알렌, "과학의 수사학" (1990), 궁리
- 넬슨 존, "탐구의 수사학", pp.1~24 (2003), 고려대 출판부
- 박종석, "개화기 한국의 과학 교과서" (2007), 한국학술정보
- 보그랑데 R. A, "담화 텍스트언어학 입문" (1981), 양영각
- 신선경, "자연과학적 글쓰기의 수사적 전통과 방향(Ⅰ)", 텍스트언어학, 21, pp.279~305 (2006), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 신선경, "과학탐구와 과학 글쓰기에 대한 텍스트언어학적 접근", 텍스트언어학, 24(0), pp.75~99 (2008), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 신선경, "자연과학 텍스트에 나타난 유추와 은유 -개념구조의 사상을 중심으로-", 한국어 의미학, 29, pp.133~152 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 신선경, "과학의 언어: 이론 구성과 소통 기능을 중심으로", 사고와 표현, 2(1) (2009)
- 이은희, "교재의 텍스트적 특성", 국어교육연구, 6, pp.63~80 (1996), 국어교육학회
- "21세기 과학 기술의 전망"[URL]
- 하인즈 파터, "텍스트의 구조와 이해: 텍스트언어학의 새 지평" (2001), 배재대 출판부
- Bacon, F., "Essay, Advancement fo Learning, New Atlantis and SpeechActs" (1937), MIT press
- Bizzell, P., "Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness" (1992), University of Pittsburgh Press
- Boyd,R, "Metaphor and Theory Change: What is Metaphor a Metaphor for", pp.356~408 (1979), Cambridge UniversityPress
- Cohen, "An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method" (1934), Harcourt Brace
- Darian,S, "Understanding the language of science" (2003), University of TexasPress
- Dunbar,K, "The Analogical Paradox: Why Analogy Is so Easy in NaturalisticSettings, Yet so Difficult in Psychological Laboratory, The Analogical Mind:Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Gentner & Holyoak & Kokinov eds", pp.313~334 (2001), MIT press
- Kearsey, J, "Evaluating textbooks: the role of genre analysis", Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), pp.35~43 (1999)
- Lynch, P, "Tracing the origins and development of the mordenscience text: are new text books really new", Research in Science Education, 13, pp.233~43 (1983)
- Nystrand,M, "What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure ofWritten Discourse" (1982), Academic
- Porter,J, "Audience and Rhetoric: An Archaeological Composition of theDiscourse Community" (1992), Prentice Hall
- Swales,J.M, "Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Gentner, D, "The Swift from Metaphor to Analogy in WesternScience, Metaphor and Thought 2nd Edition, Ortony, A. ed", pp.447~480 (1994), Cambridge university Press
- Gross, A.G, "Communicating Science：TheScientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present" (2000), UniversityPress
- Halliday M. A. K, "Writing Science：Literacy and DiscursivePower" (1993), University of Pittsburgh Press
- Reeves C, "The language of Science" (2005), Routledge
- Stocklmayer S. M, "Science Communication in Theoryand Practice" (2001), Kulwer Academic Publisher
- Thier M, "The New Science Literacy：Using language skills to helpstudents learn science" (2002), NH
- Tenopir, C, "Communication Patterns of Engineers" (2004), IEEE Press
- Wellington, "Language and Literacy in Science education" (2001), Open University Press
- 김진만, "과학2" (2010), 교학사
- 박문수, "과학2" (2010), 동화사
- 채광표, "과학2" (2010), 금성출판사
- 김명환, "과학2" (2010), 천재교육
- 진만식, "과학2" (2010), 천재교육
- 노석호, "과학2" (2010), 비상교육
- 이현주, "과학2" (2010), 두배의느낌
- 강성주, "과학2" (2010), 중앙교육진흥연구소
- 김태일, "과학2" (2010), 미래앤컬쳐그룹
- 현종오, "과학2" (2010), 두산동아