사회변동과 형법의 과제
Social Change and the Assignment of Criminal Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Our society has been undergoing an intense development of scientific technologies, setting off the high-speed ‘compressive growth’ that inevitably drew dark sides in our society, which the contemporary society stipulates as a ‘risky society.’ Prevention of such a phenomenon has abusively held on to criminal countermeasures. Consequently, criminal law has been so expanded that certain terminologies are not unfamiliar such as a majority of modern special criminal laws, economic criminal law, science and technology criminal law, environment criminal law, labor criminal law, among many. What also facilitates the expansion is the tendency to neglect the experts in the legislative process. At this moment, we, however, as the contemplating scholars of criminal law before the ‘advent of modern crimes’, have the responsibility for reflective criticism of the expansion of criminal law that has to be ultima ratio; that is, if the expansion is, in essence, a balanced growth for legal protection or if it is an excessive growth. In a nutshell, the change of criminal law progressed in our changing society has showed a conspicuous fact that it had moved towards criminalization rather than decriminalization. The problem is sprawling expansion of special laws that don't correspond with the assignment of criminal law. From now on, though it is already a lot late, we must return to the original area of criminal law(The kernel of criminal law). We have to get out of delusion which only focuses on the remedy effect of criminal law and cannot see the violation effect. Therefore it is imperative to target decriminalization.
Abstract
Our society has been undergoing an intense development of scientific technologies, setting off the high-speed ‘compressive growth’ that inevitably drew dark sides in our society, which the contemporary society stipulates as a ‘risky society.’ Prevention of such a phenomenon has abusively held on to criminal countermeasures. Consequently, criminal law has been so expanded that certain terminologies are not unfamiliar such as a majority of modern special criminal laws, economic criminal law, science and technology criminal law, environment criminal law, labor criminal law, among many. What also facilitates the expansion is the tendency to neglect the experts in the legislative process. At this moment, we, however, as the contemplating scholars of criminal law before the ‘advent of modern crimes’, have the responsibility for reflective criticism of the expansion of criminal law that has to be ultima ratio; that is, if the expansion is, in essence, a balanced growth for legal protection or if it is an excessive growth. In a nutshell, the change of criminal law progressed in our changing society has showed a conspicuous fact that it had moved towards criminalization rather than decriminalization. The problem is sprawling expansion of special laws that don't correspond with the assignment of criminal law. From now on, though it is already a lot late, we must return to the original area of criminal law(The kernel of criminal law). We have to get out of delusion which only focuses on the remedy effect of criminal law and cannot see the violation effect. Therefore it is imperative to target decriminalization.
참고문헌 (39)
- "현대적 범죄와 형법적 대응", 제8회 한·중 형법 국제학술 심포지엄
- "형사실체법의 개정방향", 한국형사법학회 2004년 동계학술회의
- "주요 형사특별법 정비방안", 한국형사정책학회 2006년 하계학술회의
- "형사사법의 정비방안", 한국비교형사학회 2006년 동아시아 형사사법 국제학술회의
- 허일태, "위험사회의 출현과 법의 기능변화", 비교형사법연구, 3(2) (2001)
- 박강우, "위험형법론" (2008), 한국학술정보(주)
- 김재윤, "현대형법의 위기와 과제" (2009), 전남대학교출판부
- 최석윤, "상징형법에 대한 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.6~164 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 배종대, "‘특별’형법을 ‘보통’형법으로 만들기", 형사정책, 18(1), pp.9~20 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
- 오영근, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 폐지의 당위성", 형사정책, 17(2), pp.33~53 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
- 이승현, "형법과 형사특별법의 법정형 정비방안. in: 형사법개정 연구자료집Ⅱ", pp.32~ (2009), 법무부
- 형사특별법정비방안(Ⅰ), "도중진", 117~, pp.한국형사정책연구원 연구총서08-8-01
- 배종대, "형법각론"
- 이천현, "행정형벌의 벌칙조항의 법정형 정비방안. in: 형사법개정 연구자료집Ⅱ", pp.133~ (2009), 법무부
- "헌재1992. 4.28. 90헌바24 전원재판부(특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 제5조의3 제2항 제1호에 대한 헌법소원)", ~
- "헌재2002.11.28. 2002헌가5 전원재판부(국가보안법 제13조 위헌제청)", ~
- "헌재2003.11.27. 2002헌바24 전원재판부(특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 제11조제1한 위헌소원)", ~
- "헌재2004.12.16. 2003헌가12 전원재판부(폭력행위등처벌에관한법률 제3조제2항 위헌제청)", ~
- "헌재2006.4.27. 2006헌가5 전원재판부(특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 제5조 제4항 제1호 등 위헌제청)", ~
- "헌재2008.12.26. 2007헌가10 전원재판부(특정강력범죄의처벌에관한특례법 제3조 위헌제청)", ~
- 인터넷 연합뉴스, "2010.8.31, ‘전자발찌 소급’ 위헌제청...재판 일부 중단될 듯", ~ (2010)
- 조선일보, "2010. 7. 5, ‘성범죄자 성충동 약물치료법’ 성폭력 근절 해법 되나", ~ (2010)
- 법률신문, "2010.7. 22, 국회통과 성범죄자 ‘약물치료법’ 학계 거센 비판", ~ (2010)
- 배종대, "형사실체법 개정의 기본방향. in: 형사법개정연구 자료집", pp.1~ (2008), 법무부
- 허일태, "형사특별법의 형법편입방향", 721~
- , 제288회국회 국회본회의회의록, 통권 : 2
- , 제288회국회 국회법제사법위원회회의록(임시회의록), 통권 : 2
- 류여해, "입법과정을 통한 형사문제점 고찰", 한국비교형사법학회 춘계학술회의(2010.4.17, 고려대) 발표논문집
- W. 하쎄머, "형법정책" (1998), 세창출판사
- 이용식, "위험사회에서의 법익보호와 적극적 일반예방", 형사정책, 13(1), pp.47~ (2001)
- 한국경제, "2010.3.26, 사형집행 재개해야 하나요", ~ (2010)
- 국민일보, "2010.3.16, 이 법무, 사형집행 재개 시사", ~ (2010)
- 이경재, "1990년대 이후 형사정책 관련 법률의 특징과 이에 대한 평가", 법학연구, 30, pp.189~218 (2010), 부설법학연구소
- "법무부 보도자료(2008.7.24)", 4~ (2008)
- "헌법재판소 2007.11.29, 2005헌가10", ~
- "헌법재판소 2010.7.29, 2009헌가18", ~
- 배종대, "형법총론"
- 이정원, "형법총론", pp.83~ (2001)
- 배종대, "형법개정의 기본방향", 형사법연구, 22, pp.6~ (2004)