본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

사회변화와 형사입법의 정당화조건 - 형법의 기능화의 문제와 형법각칙과 형사특별법의 개정방향 -

Social Change and Requisites for Legitimation of Criminal Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Korea has been experiencing many ill effects in return for rapid modernization since 1960s. The widening gap between the rich and the poor, acceleration of disintegration, severance of communication between generations, collapse of public education, privatization of public domain and so on are the ill effects of rapid modernization. But, a clue for solving the problems are hard to be found. Recently, the dependence for information technology (IT) has been deepend, many problems such as cyber assault, cyber pornography, cyber libeling and e-commerce fraud are being raised. To cope up with these problems, German sociologist Ulrich Beck has insisted to return to the reflective modernization, which demands reflection over social principles of modern society, to dissolve the industrial society and to constitute a new society. The key factor for this process is the dissolution of the modern separation of 3 powers (the legislative, the government, and the court), experts system and reconstruction of the professional group. For this purpose, I reviewed the current Korean Criminal Law and other special criminal law, and make efforts to find out the problems of indiscreet lawmaking and strengthening of punishment in many criminal-related laws. The functionalization of criminal law is very evident at every domain of social sub-systems such as transportation, education, medical treatment, etc. For example, to protect functioning of transportation system, the theory of negligent crimes has been disrupted, and to protect functioning of medical system was enacted the special law for enforcement of health-related crimes. And the abstraction of legal goods concept has been speeded up to legitimize the protection of universal legal goods. In order to solve these problems, I suggest that the criminal law should be restrained from over-criminalization and to go back to traditional legal principles in criminal law such as "no crime, no punishment", "no legal goods, no crime", "no responsibility, no crime". Also I insist that the integration of basic criminal law and the special criminal-related law for systematization of the criminal legal system.

Abstract

Korea has been experiencing many ill effects in return for rapid modernization since 1960s. The widening gap between the rich and the poor, acceleration of disintegration, severance of communication between generations, collapse of public education, privatization of public domain and so on are the ill effects of rapid modernization. But, a clue for solving the problems are hard to be found. Recently, the dependence for information technology (IT) has been deepend, many problems such as cyber assault, cyber pornography, cyber libeling and e-commerce fraud are being raised. To cope up with these problems, German sociologist Ulrich Beck has insisted to return to the reflective modernization, which demands reflection over social principles of modern society, to dissolve the industrial society and to constitute a new society. The key factor for this process is the dissolution of the modern separation of 3 powers (the legislative, the government, and the court), experts system and reconstruction of the professional group. For this purpose, I reviewed the current Korean Criminal Law and other special criminal law, and make efforts to find out the problems of indiscreet lawmaking and strengthening of punishment in many criminal-related laws. The functionalization of criminal law is very evident at every domain of social sub-systems such as transportation, education, medical treatment, etc. For example, to protect functioning of transportation system, the theory of negligent crimes has been disrupted, and to protect functioning of medical system was enacted the special law for enforcement of health-related crimes. And the abstraction of legal goods concept has been speeded up to legitimize the protection of universal legal goods. In order to solve these problems, I suggest that the criminal law should be restrained from over-criminalization and to go back to traditional legal principles in criminal law such as "no crime, no punishment", "no legal goods, no crime", "no responsibility, no crime". Also I insist that the integration of basic criminal law and the special criminal-related law for systematization of the criminal legal system.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 김성천, "형법각론" (2006), 동현출판사
  2. 김일수, "한국형법Ⅱ 총론 하" (1997), 박영사
  3. 김일수, "새로쓴 형법총론 제10판" (2007), 박영사
  4. 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)" (2008), 박영사
  5. 배종대, "형법각론" (2010), 홍문사
  6. 백형구, "형법각론" (1999), 청림출판
  7. 서일교, "형법각론" (1978), 박영사
  8. 오영근, "형법총론" (2002), 대명출판사
  9. 김유진, "폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률, 공청회 토론문", 공청회 토론문 (2005)
  10. 김재윤, "현대형법의 위기와 과제" (2009), 전남대학교출판부
  11. 류전철, "위험사회와 위험형법", 전남대 법률행정논총, (18) (1998)
  12. 박강우, "형법에서 보편적(초개인적)법익의 보호", 안암법학, (7) (1998)
  13. 박강우, "위험형법론" (2008), 한국학술정보
  14. 박기석, "형벌의 범죄억지력과 국민의 자유와 권리", 형사정책연구, (32) (1997)
  15. 박상기, "형사특별법론" (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
  16. 배종대, "마약범죄와 인간의 존엄", 안암법학, (4) (1996)
  17. 배종대, "보안처분과 비례성원칙, 법치국가와 형법" (1998)
  18. 배종대, "형법각론(제7전정판)" (2010), 홍문사
  19. 법무연수원, "2011년 범죄백서" (2011)
  20. 안경옥, "특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률의 정비방안", 형사정책, 17(2), pp.9~32 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
  21. 오영근, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 폐지의 당위성", 형사정책, 17(2), pp.33~53 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
  22. 울리히 벡, "위험사회-새로운 근대(성)을 향하여" (1997), 새물결
  23. 이기헌, "동종의 범죄를 가액에 따라 차등처벌하는 특별형법규정", 형사판례연구, (7) (1995)
  24. 이기헌, "폭력행위등처벌에관한법률의 정비방안", 형사정책, 17(2), pp.55~79 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
  25. 이상돈, "형법의 근대성과 대화이론" (1994), 홍문사
  26. 이정훈, "전자절도의 형사책임에 관한 연구", 중앙법학, 10(2), pp.133~158 (2008), 중앙법학회
  27. 이준일, "영아유기의 합법화에 대한 헌법적 검토", 법제연구, (40), pp.337~363 (2011), 한국법제연구원
  28. 이천현, "형법각칙 개정연구", pp.108~ (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  29. 이천현, "형법각칙 개정연구" (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  30. 이호중, "성형법 담론에서 섹슈얼리티의 논의지형과 한계 -혼인빙자감음죄와 간통제 페지논의를 중심으로-", 형사정책, 23(1), pp.337~362 (2011), 한국형사정책학회
  31. 임웅, "비범죄화의 이론" (1999), 법문사
  32. 탁희성, "전자정보 침해의 실태와 법적 규제" (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
  33. 平野龍一, "刑法槪說" (1977)
  34. Beck, U., "Politik in der Risikogesellschaft. Essays und Analysen", pp.15~ (1991), Frankfurt a. M
  35. Bernd Müssig, "Schutz der abstrakter Rechtsgüter und abstrakter Rechtsgüterschutz" (1994), Frankfurt a. M.
  36. Gunter Teubner, "Verrechtlichung - Begriffe, Merkmale, Grenzen, Auswege, In Verrechtlichung von Wirtschaft, Arbeit und sozialer Solidarität" (1984)
  37. Schmidt, "Steuerung neuer Risiken mit Hilfe des zivilrechtlichen Vertragsrechts", KritV, pp.346~ (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)