허위자백의 사례분석을 통해 본 형사절차상 문제점
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the criminal justice system which is designed to realize the social justice, if innocent people are found guilty through their false confessions, it means the complete failure of system. Accordingly, executions of empirical studies of false confession and researches of its prevention and remedy have very important meanings in criminal procedures. Through analyzing false confession cases, we can identify the problems in the investigation procedures and the trials. Firstly in the investigation procedures, confession oriented investigation, violation of exclusionary rule for confession in suspect interrogation procedure and various false habitual investigation practices increase the possibilities of false confessions and eventually could bring failure of the investigation. In addition, we need special cautions and policies for adolescents and handicapped people, because they tend to have higher risks of false confession. In the trails, there remains “the voluntariness assumed’ attitude which formally investigates the voluntariness of confession. Additionally, there also exists the problem that the experts who are working in criminal procedures like investigators and judges don’t recognize the possibilities that false confession could happen anytime, because they don’t have sufficient understanding about false confession. In order to overcome the problems in criminal procedures and to secure the transparency of the investigation, we especially need to have compulsory videotaped interrogation or appoint the public defender in the investigation procedures as alternatives. In trails, we need much stricter evaluation of voluntariness of confession. In addition, investigators, prosecutors, judges and all the people who are working in criminal procedures should have professional education to expand the understanding of false confession.
Abstract
In the criminal justice system which is designed to realize the social justice, if innocent people are found guilty through their false confessions, it means the complete failure of system. Accordingly, executions of empirical studies of false confession and researches of its prevention and remedy have very important meanings in criminal procedures. Through analyzing false confession cases, we can identify the problems in the investigation procedures and the trials. Firstly in the investigation procedures, confession oriented investigation, violation of exclusionary rule for confession in suspect interrogation procedure and various false habitual investigation practices increase the possibilities of false confessions and eventually could bring failure of the investigation. In addition, we need special cautions and policies for adolescents and handicapped people, because they tend to have higher risks of false confession. In the trails, there remains “the voluntariness assumed’ attitude which formally investigates the voluntariness of confession. Additionally, there also exists the problem that the experts who are working in criminal procedures like investigators and judges don’t recognize the possibilities that false confession could happen anytime, because they don’t have sufficient understanding about false confession. In order to overcome the problems in criminal procedures and to secure the transparency of the investigation, we especially need to have compulsory videotaped interrogation or appoint the public defender in the investigation procedures as alternatives. In trails, we need much stricter evaluation of voluntariness of confession. In addition, investigators, prosecutors, judges and all the people who are working in criminal procedures should have professional education to expand the understanding of false confession.
참고문헌 (26)
- 浜田寿美男, "自白の研究" (2005), 亞細亞印刷株式會社
- 신동운, "신형사소송법 제4판" (2012), 법문사
- 진실화해위원회 종합보고서Ⅳ, "진실화해위원회", ~ (2010)
- 21세기 형사사법개혁의 방향과 대국민법률서비스 개선방안, "한국형사정책연구원", ~ (2004)
- Gisly H. Gudjonsson, "Psychological vulnerabilities during police interviews. Why are they important?", Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15 (2010)
- Gisly H. Gudjonsson, "The role of personality in relation to confessions", Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(2) (2004)
- John F. Sigurdsson, "The Psychological Characteristics of 'False Confessors'. A Study among Icelandic Prison Inmates and Juvenile Offenders", Person, indicid, Diff, 20(3) (1996)
- Kassin, "The Psychology of Confessions : A Review of the Literature and Issues", Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(2) (2004)
- Richard A. Leo, "The Problem of False Confession in the Post-DNA World", North Carolina Law Review, 82(3) (2004)
- Richard A. Leo, "Bringing Reliability Back in: False Confessions and Legal Safeguards in the Twenty-First Century", Wisconsin Law Review (2006)
- Sandra D. Westervelt, "Wrongly Convicted" (2008), Rutgers University Press
- Saul. M. Kassin, "False Confessions - Causes, Consequences, and Implications for Reform", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, pp.249~ (2008)
- Torkildson, J., "Inside interrogation: The outright lie, the bluff, and false confessions", Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Conference (2008)
- 강종선, "미국에서의 허위자백에 관한 연구, In 사실인정방법론의 정립" (2006), 법원도서관
- 김병준, "허위자백의 심리구조: K순경(1992) 사건을 중심으로", 수사연구 2003년 6-8월호 연재, ~ (2003)
- 류전철, "약속에 의한 자백과 유죄협상(PleaBargaining)", 비교형사법연구, 7(2(2)), pp.203~226 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
- 백승경, "반복질문이 허위자백에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 19(3), pp.23~36 (2005), 한국사회및성격심리학회
- 이기수, "형사절차상 허위자백의 원인과 대책에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2012
- 이 삼, "자백배제법칙에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 張倫碩, "違法蒐集自白의 證據排除에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1992
- 장훈도, "허위자백의 실례분석을 통한 피의자신문 개선방안", 수사연구, 22(4) (2004)
- 장훈도, "허위자백의 심리분석에 따른 군 수사기관의 신문방법", 육군 2003년 11, 2003
- 전미혜, "형벌의 감경 약속과 범죄 심각성이 허위자백에 미치는 영향", 석사, 범죄심리학, pp.2009
- 조국, "영미 체포‧구속제도의 특징과 그 비교법적 함의", 비교형사법연구, 11(1), pp.1~26 (2009), 한국비교형사법학회
- 조국, "자백배제법칙의 근거와 효과 그리고 임의성 입증", 서울대학교 法學, 43(1) (2002)
- 천진호, "수사과정에서의 영상녹화제도의 합리적 운용방향 - 입법연혁적 논의를 중심으로 -", 비교형사법연구, 11(1), pp.279~300 (2009), 한국비교형사법학회