학교폭력에 대한 경찰훈방의 법제화 방안
School Violence and Legislation of Police Diversion
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently students suicided himself due to violence in schools. So we are questioning effect of various countermeasures against violence in schools. And we are needing another countermeasures against violence in schools. Police diversion for school violence should be legislated. Diversion program would avoid the stigma and deviance-enhancing effect of official labeling and thereby reduce recidivism. Police handles school violent case for the first time. So police should have diversion program. Object of legislation of police diversion should be student offender. Because meaning of school violence is obvious. This term is in Act on the prevention of and countermeasures against violence in schools. But it is not related to criminal law. Purpose of this Act is to protect the human right of students and raise students as healthy members of society through the protection of victim students, the guidance and education of aggressor students, and mediation between victim students and aggressor students, by providing for matters necessary for the prevention of and countermeasures against violence in schools. Police diversion is authority related to criminal procedure. Police diversion for student offender should be legislated in Act on the performance of duties by police officers. That needs in korean diversion program system. In legislating of police diversion for student offender, the following provision about juveniles of Juvenile Act Article 4 should be abolished. Juveniles who are 10 years of age or more, fall under any of the following items and in view of their character or environment, may be prone to commit acts in violation of Acts and subordinate statutes relating to criminal punishment. ①Juveniles who have inclinations to cause uneasy feeling for people around them by roaming in groups. ②Juveniles who stay away from home without any justifiable reason. ③Juveniles who have inclinations to drink alcohol, raise a disturbance or be exposed to harmful environment influences. According to Act on the prevention of and countermeasures against violence in schools, each school shall establish an autonomous committee for countermeasures against school violence(hereinafter referred to as “autonomous committee”) for the purpose of deliberating on matters related to the prevention of and countermeasures against school violence. Autonomous committee should involve police diversion program for student offender. And student offender should have chance to compromise with a victim such as compensation for loss or so.
Abstract
Recently students suicided himself due to violence in schools. So we are questioning effect of various countermeasures against violence in schools. And we are needing another countermeasures against violence in schools. Police diversion for school violence should be legislated. Diversion program would avoid the stigma and deviance-enhancing effect of official labeling and thereby reduce recidivism. Police handles school violent case for the first time. So police should have diversion program. Object of legislation of police diversion should be student offender. Because meaning of school violence is obvious. This term is in Act on the prevention of and countermeasures against violence in schools. But it is not related to criminal law. Purpose of this Act is to protect the human right of students and raise students as healthy members of society through the protection of victim students, the guidance and education of aggressor students, and mediation between victim students and aggressor students, by providing for matters necessary for the prevention of and countermeasures against violence in schools. Police diversion is authority related to criminal procedure. Police diversion for student offender should be legislated in Act on the performance of duties by police officers. That needs in korean diversion program system. In legislating of police diversion for student offender, the following provision about juveniles of Juvenile Act Article 4 should be abolished. Juveniles who are 10 years of age or more, fall under any of the following items and in view of their character or environment, may be prone to commit acts in violation of Acts and subordinate statutes relating to criminal punishment. ①Juveniles who have inclinations to cause uneasy feeling for people around them by roaming in groups. ②Juveniles who stay away from home without any justifiable reason. ③Juveniles who have inclinations to drink alcohol, raise a disturbance or be exposed to harmful environment influences. According to Act on the prevention of and countermeasures against violence in schools, each school shall establish an autonomous committee for countermeasures against school violence(hereinafter referred to as “autonomous committee”) for the purpose of deliberating on matters related to the prevention of and countermeasures against school violence. Autonomous committee should involve police diversion program for student offender. And student offender should have chance to compromise with a victim such as compensation for loss or so.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강동욱, "소년사범에 대한 수사기관의 처분에 관한 고찰", 한양법학, 19 (2006)
- 학교폭력 대응방안으로서 회복적 소년사법 실험연구(Ⅰ), "김은경", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2006)
- 김태명, "다이버전의 발상.전개와 경찰다이버전의 도입", 경찰학연구, 11(2), pp.73~100 (2011), 경찰대학
- 김태명, "경찰단계에서의 형사사법처분 도입 방안", 인권보호를 위한 수사선진화방안 학술 세미나 자료집 (2011)
- 김재민, "경찰의 소년범 다이버전 정책에 관한 고찰 - 회복적 사법 이념의 반영 가능성을 중심으로 -", 소년보호연구, 15, pp.219~252 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 김재봉, "소년경찰과 다이버전", 형사정책, 17(1), pp.33~59 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
- 김형훈, "경찰훈방", 경찰학연구, (2), pp.181~207 (2002), 경찰대학
- 노호래, "청소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 다이버전(Diversion)", 법학연구, 19 (2005)
- 송병호, "한국경찰의 훈방제도에 관한 연구", 유관순 연구, (9) (2006), 백석대학교 유관순연구소
- 문성도, "파출소장 훈방권의 법적 근거", 경찰대 논문집 (1995)
- 박동수, "학교폭력 예방에 관한 고찰: 경찰다이버전중심으로", 한국행정학학회 하계학술발표논문집 (2012)
- 박찬걸, "학교폭력대책법에 대한 비판적 검토", 소년보호연구, 15, pp.91~130 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 신동운, "다이버젼運動과 善導條件附 起訴猶豫", 형사정책, (2) (1987)
- 선도조건부기소유예제도에 관한 연구, "오영근", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1994)
- 원혜욱, "학교폭력예방및대책에관한법률의 문제점 및 개선방안", 소년보호연구, (7) (2006)
- 이승현, "「학교폭력 예방 및 대책에 관한 법률」의 개정내용 및 개선방안", 형사정책연구, 23(2), pp.157~190 (2012), 한국형사정책연구원[DOI]
- 이영돈, "학교폭력에 대한 경찰의 법·제도적 대응방안 고찰", 法學論文集, 36(1), pp.165~197 (2012), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 이영란, "소년사법절차에 관한 연구 -소년경찰의 다이버전을 중심으로-", 소년보호연구, 15, pp.1~30 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 이윤호, "최근 소년사법의 경향에 따른 소년범에 대한 효과적인 대응방안의 모색", 한국공안행정학회보, (22), pp.321~348 (2006), 한국공안행정학회
- 이주호, "성비행을 통해 본 학교폭력대책의 문제점과 개선방안", 학교폭력대책의 올바른 방향과 법률적 과제 (2005), 학교폭력대책국민협의회·국회좋은교육연구회
- 이진국, "소년 다이버전의 법적 쟁점에 관한 소고", 형사정책연구, 17(3), pp.67~98 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이진국, "학교 폭력 예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 체계적 문제점과 개선방안", 입법정책, 1(1) (2007)
- 이진국, "조건부 기소유예의 도입에 관한 검토", 형사정책연구, 15(1), pp.63~86 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이춘화, "소년형사사건 처리절차의 문제점과 개선방안", 한양법학, (29), pp.95~114 (2010), 한양법학회
- 이호중, "소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안- 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)", 형사정책연구, 15(3), pp.5~44 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 조국, "경찰 ‘훈방권’의 법적 근거와 한계", 한국 경찰법연구, (창간) (2003)
- 경찰 ‘보호조치’와 ‘훈방조치’의 법적 근거 및 한계에 관한 연구, "조국", 치안정책연구소, ~ (2003)
- 전지연, "경찰 다이버젼의 도입필요성과 그 내용", 형사정책, 16(2), pp.187~207 (2004), 한국형사정책학회
- 최병각, "소년폭력사건의 처리과정에서 형사사법기관의 역할과 한계", 형사정책연구, 18(2), pp.293~324 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 한진태, "한국사회 학교폭력의 실태와 대처 방안에 關한 硏究", 소년보호연구, 18, pp.195~226 (2012), 한국소년정책학회
- 경찰청, "경찰백서" (2011)
- 대검찰청, "2011 범죄분석", ~ (2011)
- Ronald L. Ackers, "Criminological theories" (2009), Oxford university press
