본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

A Study on Prevention of School VIOLENCE and Measures

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The problem of the school violence of the youth is not merely the deviation of the individual, but the social problem that our community must solve as a top priority. In recent media reports on juvenile school violence, newspapers and portal sites have spread. People who were angry at the school violence filed a petition to abolish the Juvenile Law on the Cheongwadae homepage, and more than 270,000 people have complained about it, resulting in a huge societal aftereffect. It does not mean that they do not understand community members' sympathy. Although they trust the strong national obedience as a measure against school violence, they do not have a great effect. At the end of 2011, Daegu's suicide incident became publicized, causing a great social shock. The government announced that it would eradicate school violence in 2012, and announced the "Comprehensive Measures for the Elimination of School Violence". After the announcement of the measure, it was reported that the violence was reduced by simple numerical figures. However, after several years, we can not help asking whether the measure emphasizing unilateralism is effective. This shows the limitations of not being able to create a healthy community and not fundamentally reducing school violence and juvenile delinquency as a powerful imperative of the current judicial system in which the punishment of the perpetrator punishment = problem solving is widespread in our society. Therefore, in this study, how is the direction of school violence and genuine restorative justice defined in the current situation, where the national criminal justice system paradigm is shifting from the victim-centered traditional criminal justice system to the offender-centered criminal justice system? The current Criminal Justice Review examines the meaning and effectiveness of the traditional national criminal right to combat and complement the ideology of restorative justice as a preventive measure against serious school violence. It is necessary to plan ways to bring about substantial change.

Abstract

The problem of the school violence of the youth is not merely the deviation of the individual, but the social problem that our community must solve as a top priority. In recent media reports on juvenile school violence, newspapers and portal sites have spread. People who were angry at the school violence filed a petition to abolish the Juvenile Law on the Cheongwadae homepage, and more than 270,000 people have complained about it, resulting in a huge societal aftereffect. It does not mean that they do not understand community members' sympathy. Although they trust the strong national obedience as a measure against school violence, they do not have a great effect. At the end of 2011, Daegu's suicide incident became publicized, causing a great social shock. The government announced that it would eradicate school violence in 2012, and announced the "Comprehensive Measures for the Elimination of School Violence". After the announcement of the measure, it was reported that the violence was reduced by simple numerical figures. However, after several years, we can not help asking whether the measure emphasizing unilateralism is effective. This shows the limitations of not being able to create a healthy community and not fundamentally reducing school violence and juvenile delinquency as a powerful imperative of the current judicial system in which the punishment of the perpetrator punishment = problem solving is widespread in our society. Therefore, in this study, how is the direction of school violence and genuine restorative justice defined in the current situation, where the national criminal justice system paradigm is shifting from the victim-centered traditional criminal justice system to the offender-centered criminal justice system? The current Criminal Justice Review examines the meaning and effectiveness of the traditional national criminal right to combat and complement the ideology of restorative justice as a preventive measure against serious school violence. It is necessary to plan ways to bring about substantial change.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 이인곤, "학교폭력예방 및 대책으로서 회복적 사법제도에 관한 연구", 법이론실무연구, 6(3), pp.253~292 (2018), 사단법인 한국법이론실무학회
  2. 김봉철, "학교폭력에 대한 학부모들의 낙관적 편견과 예방 캠페인에 대한 탐색적 고찰: 자아 존중감과 학교폭력 경험을 중심으로", 언론과학연구, 9(4), pp.65~97 (2009), 한국지역언론학회
  3. Lee HJ, "Restorative Justice - Ideological and Legal Theoretical Issues", Korean Journal of Victimology, 9(1), pp.27~51 (2001)
  4. 임상규, "소년범죄의 합리적 처리방안", 형사법연구, (17), pp.237~258 (2002), 한국형사법학회
  5. 박정성, "형사절차상 피해자-가해자의 조정제도", 법학논총, 26(2), pp.53~78 (2009), 법학연구소
  6. John Braithwaite, "Restorative Justice & Re-sponsive Regulation" (2002), Oxford University
  7. Tony FM, "Restorative Justice an Overview" (1998), University of Minnesota
  8. Bazemore G, "Restorative Juve-nile Justice: In Search of Fundamentals and an Outline for Systemic Reform" (1999), Willow Tree
  9. Howard Zehr, "Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice" (1990), Herald
  10. Kim YS, "Restorative Justice and Criminal Reconciliation" (2009), Jinwonsa
  11. Umsetzung der Konzepte von ‘Restorative Justice’ in das Koreanische Strafjustizsystem, "Lee JK", Korean Institute of Crimin, ~ (2006)
  12. Bazemore G, "Restorative Ju-venile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime" (1999), Willow Tree

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)