본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공정거래법상 전속고발권의 존폐론 검토

A Study on the Debate over Abolishment of Exclusive Complaint Right under Fair Trade Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act gave Fair Trade Commission exclusive complaint right that was on dispute so far since introduction in 1981. On June 25, 2013, the National Assembly revised the law to expand request of the complaint on illegal cartel in accordance with the law that was on dispute so far. This was because the revision of the law was difficult to accept abolishment of exclusive complaint right from point of view of whole value of the revision. The dispute on exclusive complaint system was largely originated from not only difference of position of parties interested but also conflict of interests that was recurred at discussion of scholars on the system. In other words, dispute on the exclusive complaint system was ongoing. More than 30 years after the Fair Trade Act introduced the system, abolition of the system should be carefully reexamined. This study investigated to reexamine abolition of the exclusive complaint right in accordance with the Fair Trade Act: 1) values and functions of the exclusive complaint system, 2) current state of exclusive complaint right and legislation of each country, 3) situation and problems of discussion on abolition of exclusive complaint right in accordance with the Fair Trade Act. The study suggested legal reformation for abolishment of exclusive complaint system to reach a conclusion:The exclusive complaint system of the law was introduced to let enterprise and other economic entities get national and/or administrative influence in the era of state-dominated economic development. But, the system prevented competition order and sound development of national economy under current economic system so that it should be abolished. The revision of the law that criminal punishment of the law was under control of the Administration was on dispute. Therefore, exclusive complaint right of the law should be abolished: In other words, American system of antitrust dual enforcement should be introduced subject to classification and assessment of various kinds of regulatory behaviors under the law.

Abstract

The Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act gave Fair Trade Commission exclusive complaint right that was on dispute so far since introduction in 1981. On June 25, 2013, the National Assembly revised the law to expand request of the complaint on illegal cartel in accordance with the law that was on dispute so far. This was because the revision of the law was difficult to accept abolishment of exclusive complaint right from point of view of whole value of the revision. The dispute on exclusive complaint system was largely originated from not only difference of position of parties interested but also conflict of interests that was recurred at discussion of scholars on the system. In other words, dispute on the exclusive complaint system was ongoing. More than 30 years after the Fair Trade Act introduced the system, abolition of the system should be carefully reexamined. This study investigated to reexamine abolition of the exclusive complaint right in accordance with the Fair Trade Act: 1) values and functions of the exclusive complaint system, 2) current state of exclusive complaint right and legislation of each country, 3) situation and problems of discussion on abolition of exclusive complaint right in accordance with the Fair Trade Act. The study suggested legal reformation for abolishment of exclusive complaint system to reach a conclusion:The exclusive complaint system of the law was introduced to let enterprise and other economic entities get national and/or administrative influence in the era of state-dominated economic development. But, the system prevented competition order and sound development of national economy under current economic system so that it should be abolished. The revision of the law that criminal punishment of the law was under control of the Administration was on dispute. Therefore, exclusive complaint right of the law should be abolished: In other words, American system of antitrust dual enforcement should be introduced subject to classification and assessment of various kinds of regulatory behaviors under the law.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 공정거래위원회, "2012년도 통계연보", ~ (2013)
  2. 권민용, "공정거래위원회의 고발제도에 관한 연구", 저스티스, 34(1) (2001)
  3. 권오승, "경제법" (2010), 법문사
  4. 조홍식, "공정거래와 법치" (2004), 법문사
  5. 권오승, "독점규제법" (2012), 법문사
  6. 김남욱, "독점규제법 위반행위에 대한 행정형벌", 공법연구, 30(1) (2001)
  7. 김두진, "공정거래법 집행의 이원화를 통한 효율성 강화 방안", 법조, 57(11), pp.122~153 (2008), 법조협회
  8. 공정거래법 및 소비자관련법상 징벌적 배상제도의 도입, "김두진", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2007)
  9. 김두진, "공정거래법 위반행위에 대한 형사처벌에서 공정거래위원회의 역할 –전속고발제도를 중심으로-, In 경제법판례연구 제2권" (2005), 법문사
  10. 김범식, "동의명령제 도입에 대한 형사법적 고찰", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.265~287 (2008), 법학연구소
  11. 김윤수, "담합 근절을 위한 공정거래법 개정 방향 토론문", 담합 근절을 위한 공정거래법 개정 심포지엄 자료집 (2012), 서울지방변호사회
  12. 공정거래법상의 전속고발제도에 대한 비교법적 연구, "박광민", ~ (2012)
  13. 박영동, "전속고발제도에 대한 소고 -공정거래위원회가 고발하지 않은 자에 대한 기소 문제를 중심으로-", 경쟁법연구, 21, pp.163~184 (2010), 한국경쟁법학회
  14. 박찬걸, "공정거래법상 전속고발과 관련된 법리의 검토", 서울법학, 20(1), pp.371~410 (2012), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
  15. 신현윤, "경제법" (2006), 법문사
  16. 신현윤, "소비자 보호를 위한 현행 독점규제법 규정과 문제점", 경쟁법연구, 5 (1994)
  17. 오대성, "집단소송제의 도입필요성과 도입방향", 저스티스, (95), pp.159~174 (2006), 한국법학원
  18. 오영중, "최근 기업 담합행위의 특성과 억제방안에 관한 연구 : 집단소송법 및 징벌적손해배상제 도입과 자진신고자감면제도개선 등을 중심으로", 인권과 정의, (426), pp.50~74 (2012), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  19. 이건묵, "불공정행위의 현황과 대책-전속고발권을 중심으로", 형사정책, 22(2), pp.9~46 (2010), 한국형사정책학회
  20. 이상현, "공정거래법상 전속고발권에 대한 ‘고소불가분 원칙’의 적용가능성", 법조, 59(11), pp.223~265 (2010), 법조협회
  21. 공정거래법상 형사적 제재에 대한 개선방안 연구, "이천현", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2006)
  22. 공정거래법 집행에 관한 법개정 연구, in 공정거래법 전면 개편방안(상)-경쟁이론과 공정거래법, "장승화", 한국경제연구원, ~ (2004)
  23. 정완, "공정거래위원회의 전속고발제도에 관한 고찰", 외법논집, (30), pp.289~314 (2008), 법학연구소
  24. 최병각, "전속고발제도에 관한 연구" (1999), 형사정책연구원
  25. 최정학, "공정거래위원회의 전속고발권 존폐론의 검토", 형사법연구, 23(3), pp.311~336 (2011), 한국형사법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)