중국에서 전쟁범죄에 관한 연구논평
Review on War Crimes in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
China has made due contributions to the international community punishing war crimes whether in theory or in practice. The theoretical studies focused on the connotation and denotation of war crimes, Chinese legal basis for punishing war crimes and judicial practice, body found criminally responsible for war crimes, the norms convergence between Chinese criminal law and international criminal law about punishing war crimes, the research on the historical development and future trends of international punishing war crimes and other aspects. The connotation and denotation of war crimes have the trend of expansion from the perspective of evolution. Chinese punishing war crimes legal basis include not only international criminal law treaty which China has joined or signed but also Chinese domestic criminal law. The main methods of punishing war crimes are international punishment and domestic punishment. International punishment is the supplement to domestic punishment. The practice of Chinese punishing war crimes was proceeding against Japanese war criminals in World War II. The state and individuals should take criminal responsibility for war crimes together. China put forward a legislative proposal about perfecting the link between Chinese criminal law and international criminal law in punishing war crimes. Because China has not signed the “Rome Statute”, for war crimes in Chinese domestic armed conflict, it can be only exercised jurisdiction by Chinese courts. The history of international punishing war crimes can be divided into five stages from “Versailles Treaty” to “International Criminal Court Statute”. The trend and ability was increasing of punishing war crimes through the formation of international judicial bodies. The content about individual takes responsibility for war crimes will be given priority in development. A planned genocide and acts against humanity, in wartime or peacetime, in international armed conflict or non-international armed conflict, constitute serious international crimes.
Abstract
China has made due contributions to the international community punishing war crimes whether in theory or in practice. The theoretical studies focused on the connotation and denotation of war crimes, Chinese legal basis for punishing war crimes and judicial practice, body found criminally responsible for war crimes, the norms convergence between Chinese criminal law and international criminal law about punishing war crimes, the research on the historical development and future trends of international punishing war crimes and other aspects. The connotation and denotation of war crimes have the trend of expansion from the perspective of evolution. Chinese punishing war crimes legal basis include not only international criminal law treaty which China has joined or signed but also Chinese domestic criminal law. The main methods of punishing war crimes are international punishment and domestic punishment. International punishment is the supplement to domestic punishment. The practice of Chinese punishing war crimes was proceeding against Japanese war criminals in World War II. The state and individuals should take criminal responsibility for war crimes together. China put forward a legislative proposal about perfecting the link between Chinese criminal law and international criminal law in punishing war crimes. Because China has not signed the “Rome Statute”, for war crimes in Chinese domestic armed conflict, it can be only exercised jurisdiction by Chinese courts. The history of international punishing war crimes can be divided into five stages from “Versailles Treaty” to “International Criminal Court Statute”. The trend and ability was increasing of punishing war crimes through the formation of international judicial bodies. The content about individual takes responsibility for war crimes will be given priority in development. A planned genocide and acts against humanity, in wartime or peacetime, in international armed conflict or non-international armed conflict, constitute serious international crimes.
참고문헌 (22)
- 조병지, "국제 형사법원 관할의 전쟁죄를 논함", 하남 정법관리 간부학원 학원보, (6) (2003)
- 반효림, "전쟁죄의 내포 및 관련 문제(상)(사회과학판)", 란주대학 학보, (1) (2011)
- 반효림, "전쟁죄의 내포 및 관련 문제(하)", 란주대학 학보(사회과학판), (2) (2011)
- 모국휘, "전쟁법 발전 진행과정 중의 자연법 사상탐구", 당대법학, (1) (2007)
- 장효지, "전쟁범죄 및 그의 법률책임 시론", 서북대학 학보(철학 사회과학판), (5) (2005)
- 황임이, "전쟁범죄를 징벌하는데 관한 형법 적용 문제", 중국 청년 정치학원학보, (1) (2000)
- 조병지, "중국 형법전중의 국제형법 규범을 논함", 법학, (9), pp.51~ (2003)
- 로유학, "전쟁죄의 국내입법 연구", 현대법학, (2) (2007)
- 전수수, "일본군이 중국 화북에서의 전쟁범죄를 논술", 하북 사범대학학보(철학사회과학판), (4) (2005)
- 조병지, "전쟁죄의 내포 및 그의 형사책임 주체를 논함", 하북문학, (2) (2001)
- 계로, "비 국제성 무장충돌 중 전쟁범을 징벌하는데 관련된 문제 논함", 흑룍강성 정법관리간부학원 학보, (4) (2008)
- 사단, "국내 무장충돌 중 전범 심판하는데 관련된 문제 연구", 현대법학, (4) (2008)
- 서안군, "국제가 전쟁범죄를 징벌하는 역사에 대한 연구— 처음 시험으로부터 뉘른베르크와 도쿄 이차 대심판", 서안정치학원학원보, (1) (1999)
- 서안군, "국제에서 전쟁범죄를 징벌하는 역사에 대한 연구— 제네바로부터 <국제형사법원 규약>및 미래의 추세", 서안정치학원학보, (2) (1999)
- 왕문연, "우리나라 전치전쟁죄 입법이 대면하고 있는 도전과 그에 대한 건의", 국방법제, (9) (2011)
- 주문, "전쟁범죄의 원칙 및 경로에 대한 연구", 서안정치학원학보, (1) (2003)
- 장지충, "전쟁범죄와 동방주의", 사회과학칼럼, (1) (2003)
- 송지용, "도쿄심판과 중국", 항일전쟁 연구, (3) (2001)
- 마홍파, "정치전쟁범죄에 관한 형법 실용문제", 중국청소년정치학원학보, (1) (2000)
- 교박, "전쟁범죄의 형사책임을 추궁하는 실천에 대한 미래의 발전이 직면한 문제", 서안정치학원학보, (6) (2002)
- 조기명, "전쟁죄의 구성을 논함", 석사, pp.2007
- 왕진우, "원동국제군사법정법관의견연구", 석사, pp.2009