한국과 중국의 미성년자・정신장애 범죄자 형사책임능력 판단 및 정신질환 범죄자 처우 법정책
Comparative Study on the Criminal Responsibility : Law & Policy on the Minor & Mental Disordered Offender in China and South Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay studies on the matters of criminal responsibility both in Korean and Chinese criminal laws, especially law and policies on criminal minors and offender with mental disorder. According to the article 9 of Korean Criminal Act, the act of a person under fourteen years of age shall not be punished. Article 10 says that the act of a person who, because of mental disorder, is unable to make discriminations or to control one's will, shall not be punished. For the conduct of a person who, because of mental disorder, is deficient in the abilities mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the punishment shall be mitigated. Punishment shall be mitigated for the act of deaf-mutes, according to article 11. Under the Korean Medical Treatment and Custody Act, person subject to medical treatment and custody means a person who requires medical treatment at a medical treatment and detention center and is likely to recommit crime: A mentally handicapped person who is not punishable under Article 10 (1) of the Criminal Act or subject to a reduced sentence under Article 10 (2) of the Criminal Act, and has committed an offense entailing imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment; A person who has a habit of, or is addicted to drinking, taking, inhaling, smoking, or injecting narcotics, psychotropic drugs, marijuana, alcohol or other substances which are likely to be abused or harmful, and has committed an offense entailing imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment; A person who has a psychosexual disorder showing a propensity for sexual activity, such as pedophillia and sexual sadism, and has committed a sexually violent crime entailing imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment. As to medical treatment and custody, Article 16 of the Act says any person sentenced to medical treatment and custody shall be committed to a medical treatment and detention facility and actions shall be taken for the medical treatment of such person.) The period for which a person under medical treatment and custody shall be committed to a medical treatment and detention facility shall not exceed the following applicable periods: Persons falling under Article 2 (1) 1 and 3: 15 years;. Persons falling under Article 2 (1) 2: Two years. If a person under medical treatment and custody after being sentenced to medical treatment and custody for committing a homicide defined in subparagraph 3-2 of Article 2 of the Act on the Probation, Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders is deemed likely to repeat such crime and require continuous medical treatment, the court may, upon the prosecutor’s request based on the application filed by the head of the medical treatment and detention facility, decide to extend the period referred to in the subparagraphs of paragraph (2) by up to two years for an extension on up to three occasions. Chinese Criminal Act has provisions of both criminal irresponsibility and limited-responsibility both for minors and offender with mental disorder. As for medical treatment and custody for mental disordered offender, Chinese Criminal Procedure Law does not define any period for treatment and custody. While Korean Act sees risk of reoffending and necessity of treatment as conditions of treatment and custody order, those conditions under the Chinese Act are harm to public and personal safety, and risk of social safety. One of the lessons from the comparative study on Korean and Chinese law and policies on criminal responsibility is that the age standard of criminal minor may be lowered, but the criminal responsibilities of minor should be differentiated by age groups.
Abstract
This essay studies on the matters of criminal responsibility both in Korean and Chinese criminal laws, especially law and policies on criminal minors and offender with mental disorder. According to the article 9 of Korean Criminal Act, the act of a person under fourteen years of age shall not be punished. Article 10 says that the act of a person who, because of mental disorder, is unable to make discriminations or to control one's will, shall not be punished. For the conduct of a person who, because of mental disorder, is deficient in the abilities mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the punishment shall be mitigated. Punishment shall be mitigated for the act of deaf-mutes, according to article 11. Under the Korean Medical Treatment and Custody Act, person subject to medical treatment and custody means a person who requires medical treatment at a medical treatment and detention center and is likely to recommit crime: A mentally handicapped person who is not punishable under Article 10 (1) of the Criminal Act or subject to a reduced sentence under Article 10 (2) of the Criminal Act, and has committed an offense entailing imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment; A person who has a habit of, or is addicted to drinking, taking, inhaling, smoking, or injecting narcotics, psychotropic drugs, marijuana, alcohol or other substances which are likely to be abused or harmful, and has committed an offense entailing imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment; A person who has a psychosexual disorder showing a propensity for sexual activity, such as pedophillia and sexual sadism, and has committed a sexually violent crime entailing imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment. As to medical treatment and custody, Article 16 of the Act says any person sentenced to medical treatment and custody shall be committed to a medical treatment and detention facility and actions shall be taken for the medical treatment of such person.) The period for which a person under medical treatment and custody shall be committed to a medical treatment and detention facility shall not exceed the following applicable periods: Persons falling under Article 2 (1) 1 and 3: 15 years;. Persons falling under Article 2 (1) 2: Two years. If a person under medical treatment and custody after being sentenced to medical treatment and custody for committing a homicide defined in subparagraph 3-2 of Article 2 of the Act on the Probation, Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders is deemed likely to repeat such crime and require continuous medical treatment, the court may, upon the prosecutor’s request based on the application filed by the head of the medical treatment and detention facility, decide to extend the period referred to in the subparagraphs of paragraph (2) by up to two years for an extension on up to three occasions. Chinese Criminal Act has provisions of both criminal irresponsibility and limited-responsibility both for minors and offender with mental disorder. As for medical treatment and custody for mental disordered offender, Chinese Criminal Procedure Law does not define any period for treatment and custody. While Korean Act sees risk of reoffending and necessity of treatment as conditions of treatment and custody order, those conditions under the Chinese Act are harm to public and personal safety, and risk of social safety. One of the lessons from the comparative study on Korean and Chinese law and policies on criminal responsibility is that the age standard of criminal minor may be lowered, but the criminal responsibilities of minor should be differentiated by age groups.
참고문헌 (19)
- 강동욱, "범죄행위를 한 정신장애자의 법적 처우에 관한 연구 - 치료감호제도를 중심으로", 인권과 정의, (336), pp.89~111 (2004), 대한변호사협회
- 김성규, "責任能力判斷의 이론적 구조와 법률적 판단의 의미내용 - 형법 제10조 제1항 및 제2항의 해석론과 관련하여 -", 법조, 55(7), pp.230~257 (2006), 법조협회
- 김영환, "책임능력 판정에서의 심리학자와 형사법률가 - 의사소통의 차원과 권한갈등", 법학논총, (11), pp.381~394 (1994), 한양대 법학연구소
- 까오밍쉔, "중국형법총론연구" (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박상식, "정신장애범죄자의 형사책임능력판단 기준에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구, 18(1), pp.103~144 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 법원행정처, "사법연감 2015" (2015)
- 성경숙, "우리나라 치료감호법의 문제점과 개선방안", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.329~352 (2008), 법학연구소
- 성경숙, "정신장애범죄자에 대한 치료처분제도의 개선방안: 미국의 치료법원의 도입을 중심으로", 형사법연구, 22(2), pp.87~108 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 안성훈, "치료감호제도의 개선방안연구" (2011), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이덕인, "형사책임연령 하향에 대한 비판적 고찰 : 형사미성년과 촉법소년을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 23(1), pp.5~40 (2012), 한국형사정책연구원[DOI]
- 이인영, "책임능력에 대한 판단과 정신감정절차", 홍익법학, 11(2), pp.157~190 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이진국, "형사절차상 정신장애에 대한 감정", 법학논총, 28(4), pp.351~364 (2011), 법학연구소
- 이혜미, "형사미성년자 연령 하향조정의 논의와 쟁점", 이슈와 논점 제372호, 국회입법조사처, ~ (2012)
- 주용기, "법원의 책임능력평가에 관한 형사정책적 검토", 한양법학, (27), pp.315~347 (2009), 한양법학회
- 주호노, "소년의 형사책임에 관한 연구- 형사책임능력을 중심으로 -", 법조, 59(12), pp.41~76 (2010), 법조협회
- 한상훈, "책임 분야 개정방안", 형사법연구, 21(1), pp.79~114 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 천자린, "중국미성년자, 정신병환자의 형사책임 문제에 관한 연구", 제14회 한중 형법학술심포지움 자료집, pp.145~156 (2016), 한국비교형사법학회・중국형법학연구회
- 曲新久, "중국 미성년자 형사책임 입법 및 그 완비", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.405~413 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 梁根林, "당대 중국 소년범죄의 형사정책 총평", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.475~512 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
