정신질환자의 범죄에서 책임능력 및 양형에의 영향 분석
Analysis of Criminal Responsibility in Perpetrators with Mental Disorder
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Crimes committed by the mentally ill may give rise to critical conflicts on whether the criminals should receive punishment or treatment. Therefore, our criminal code has a legal provision for mental handicap and criminal responsibility, which can reduce or exempt the criminal penalty. This process requires a psychiatric evaluation of the defendants as well as normative decisions by judges. The psychiatric evaluation and diagnosis precede the court judgement, and are used by the court to judge the mental handicap of the defendant at the time of the crime. However, judgments on the criminal responsibility of a defendant with mental disorder are very complex and challenging because of time gaps and difficulties faced in the evaluation of human mental ability. We analyzed court rulings in 19 cases where the defendants claimed to be mentally handicapped. The analysis results showed that the mental handicap was recognized in nine cases, rejected in four cases, and not mentioned by the court in six cases. Further, psychiatric evaluation was not performed in three cases. Apart from the result of the evaluation, the judges seem to consider other factors for sentencing, like recidivism risk, premeditation of crimes, and their brutality. These results suggest that the rationale and procedure of court rulings involving mentally handicapped persons may be debatable. We argue that psychiatric evaluations should be made indispensable in judicial procedures for cases involving mentally handicapped persons, and judges should clearly indicate their decision on mental handicap or criminal responsibility in the sentencing.
Abstract
Crimes committed by the mentally ill may give rise to critical conflicts on whether the criminals should receive punishment or treatment. Therefore, our criminal code has a legal provision for mental handicap and criminal responsibility, which can reduce or exempt the criminal penalty. This process requires a psychiatric evaluation of the defendants as well as normative decisions by judges. The psychiatric evaluation and diagnosis precede the court judgement, and are used by the court to judge the mental handicap of the defendant at the time of the crime. However, judgments on the criminal responsibility of a defendant with mental disorder are very complex and challenging because of time gaps and difficulties faced in the evaluation of human mental ability. We analyzed court rulings in 19 cases where the defendants claimed to be mentally handicapped. The analysis results showed that the mental handicap was recognized in nine cases, rejected in four cases, and not mentioned by the court in six cases. Further, psychiatric evaluation was not performed in three cases. Apart from the result of the evaluation, the judges seem to consider other factors for sentencing, like recidivism risk, premeditation of crimes, and their brutality. These results suggest that the rationale and procedure of court rulings involving mentally handicapped persons may be debatable. We argue that psychiatric evaluations should be made indispensable in judicial procedures for cases involving mentally handicapped persons, and judges should clearly indicate their decision on mental handicap or criminal responsibility in the sentencing.
참고문헌 (28)
- Min SK, "Modern psychiatry", pp.17~33 (2015), Ilchogak
- Lee JY, "Civil law", pp.66~ (2017), Jiphyunjae
- Lee JS, "Criminal law", pp.313~321 (2017), Parkyoungsa
- Sin DO, "Criminal law", pp.375~ (2017), Bobmun-sa
- 김윤신, "판례를 통한 정신질환 관련 범죄행위의 내용과 특징 분석", 대한법의학회지, 45(2), pp.46~62 (2021), 대한법의학회[DOI]
- 최민영, "정신장애 범죄인의 책임능력 판단과 정신감정", 의료법학, 20(2), pp.83~107 (2019), 대한의료법학회[DOI]
- 임석순, "심신장애인의 책임능력 판단 기준과 논증", 법학연구, 26(4), pp.223~243 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- Currie G, "Imagination, delusion and hallucinations", Mind Lang, 15, pp.168~183 (2000)
- Langdon R, "Delusion and confabulation: overlapping or distinct distortions of reality?", Cogn Neuropsychiatry, 15, pp.1~13 (2010)
- Hodgins S, "Mental disorder and crime : evidence from a Danish birth cohort", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 53, pp.489~496 (1996)
- Modestin J, "Mental disorder and criminality : male schizophrenia", Schizophr Bull, 22, pp.69~82 (1996)
- Swanson JW, "A national study of violent behavior in persons with schizophrenia", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 63, pp.490~499 (2006)
- Hodgins S, "Violent behaviour among people with schizophrenia:a framework for investigations of causes, and effective treatment, and prevention", Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 363, pp.2505~2518 (2008)
- Seo SY, "Modern psychiatry", pp.253~279 (2015), Ilchogak
- clinical psychiatry, "Kaplan and Sadock's synopsis of psychiatry: behavioral sciences", pp.2014, Sadock BJ
- Kang HJ, "Modern psychiatry", pp.618~624 (2015), Ilchogak
- "International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems" (2016)[URL]
- American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5)", pp.719~747 (2015), American Psychiatric Publishing
- Arbanas G, "Psychiatric and forensic characteristics of sex offenders with child and with adult victims", Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol (2020)[DOI]
- "Mental examination" (2000)[URL]
- Nam YY, "Modern psychiatry", pp.885~904 (2015), Ilchogak
- 문소영, "일 정신병원의 형사정신감정을 통해 본 책임능력판단의 실제", 신경정신의학, 60(4), pp.354~365 (2021), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Kwon JH, "The preliminary research for making judgment on not guilty by reason of insanity and guilty but mentally ill", Korean J Leg Med, 32, pp.111~117 (2008)
- Choi YJ, "Characteristics of the patients subjected to the mental disability evaluation and legal decisions", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 37, pp.903~912 (1998)
- Garcia FD, "Current concepts in the pharmacotherapy of paraphilias", Drugs, 71, pp.771~790 (2011)
- 최용성, "Lanning 분류법에 의한 소아기호증의 차별적 특성에 관한 연구", 한국범죄심리연구, 12(2), pp.169~194 (2016), 한국범죄심리학회
- 조윤오, "신체 ․정신질환과 재범 발생과의 관계: 전자감독대상자를 대상으로", 사회과학연구, 27(1), pp.49~68 (2020), 사회과학연구원
- A study on psychiatric examination in the criminal justice system, "Choi MY", Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice, 291~311 (2017)
