본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

안용복의 도일 사건과 일본에서의 행적 ―안용복 도일루트와 에도행의 가능성에 관련하여―

Ahn Yong-bok's Cross the Sea to Japan and Contributions of His Behavior -concerning the possibility of his journey to Edo-

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

本稿の目的は、二度にわたって発生した安龍福の渡日事件、すなわち鬱陵島争界=竹島一件を触発させた安龍福の渡日と日本での行績を追跡することによって、鬱陵島争界に関わるいくつかの争点の実体を明らかにすることである。そしてその具体的な課題は、第一に、日本史料の記録もとづいて安龍福の行績を整理し、第二に、韓国の官撰誌『肅宗実録』にあらわれる彼の江戸行きと江戸幕府から書契を受けたのかという点を検証することである。 鳥取藩から江戸までの距離は、約700kmで江戸行きをするためには約一ヶ月の時間が必要である。しかし、安龍福の「第一次渡日」と「第一次渡日」の記録を検討してみれば、一ヶ月以上の空白が生じない。すなわち、史料によれば鳥取から安龍福が江戸へ行った可能性はほとんどない。 したがって、江戸幕府の書契は受けることはなかったといえる。しかし安龍福自身が鳥取城を江戸城と間違えて認識した可能性もある。もしも安龍福が書契を受けたとするなら鳥取藩主から受けることはできたかも知れない。しかし、『肅宗実録』の安龍福の供述記録のとおり、対馬島藩主に書契を奪われたとするなら、これについての資料が提示されねばならない。これから韓国での安龍福研究は一方的に国内史料のみに依存して主張するのではなく、それを日本側の史料と対照し、両者を検討して分析する作業が必要といえる。

Abstract

Purpose of this paper is to reveal the reality of few points of discussions on Ulleungdo-Jaenggye with Ahn Yong-bok's behavior during the two time journey to Japan which raised the event of Takeshima Ikken problem. First, this paper review Ahn Yong-bok's trait of behavior the based on Japan materials, and secondly tried to prove the reality of receiving the official letter from Edo Bafuku during his journey to Edo which described in Sukjong-silrok of Korean official record. The distance from Tottori to Edo is about 700km and takes a month to reach. However, looking at the record of his first and second journey to Japan, there is no enough month time gap of a month, which explains no possibility of Ahn Yong-bok's journey from Tottori to Edo. So he did not receive the official letter from Edo Bafuku. However, the is a possibility of his confusion on Tottori Castle to Edo Castle. If he had received the official letter, he might have received it from Tottori Han Governor. But the historical records on his deprived letter in the record about Ahn Yong-bok in Sukjong-silrok of Korean official record. the record should be proved. It should be recommended that the research and analysis on the historical records based on Japan part is necessary with Korean part as well.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 송휘영, "일본의 독도에 대한 “17세기 영유권 확립설”의 허구성 -일본 외무성의 죽도 홍보 팸플릿의 포인트 3, 4 비판-", 민족문화논총, (44), pp.35~70 (2010), 민족문화연구소
  2. 송휘영, "울릉도쟁계(竹島一件)의 결착과 스야마 쇼에몽(陶山庄右衛門)", 日本文化學報, (49), pp.263~286 (2011), 한국일본문화학회
  3. 이케우치 사토시, "일본 에도시대의 다케시마-마츠시마 인식", 독도연구, (6), pp.199~221 (2010), 영남대학교 독도연구소
  4. 박병섭, "안용복사건과 돗토리번", 독도연구, (6), pp.281~341 (2010), 영남대학교 독도연구소
  5. 박병섭, "한말 울릉도・독도 어업" (2009), 한국해양수산개발원
  6. 권오엽, "독도와 안용복" (2009), 충남대학교출판부
  7. 권오엽, "일본 고문서의 독도 岡嶋正義古文書" (2011), 도서출판 선인
  8. 송병기, "울릉도와 독도", 단국대학교출판부
  9. 신용하, "한국의 독도 영유권 연구" (2000), 경인문화사
  10. 田保橋潔, "鬱陵島그 發見과 領有", 靑丘學叢, (3), pp.19~20 (1931)
  11. 池内敏, "竹島問題とは何か" (2012), 名古屋大学出版会
  12. "肅宗實錄", ~
  13. "因府年表", ~
  14. "因府歷年大雜集", ~
  15. "御用人日記", ~
  16. "控帳", ~
  17. "大谷家古文書", ~
  18. "鳥取藩政資料", 鳥取県立博物館, ~
  19. "元祿九丙子年朝鮮舟着岸一卷之覺", ~
  20. 岡嶋正義, "竹島考 上・下" (2010)
  21. 越常右衛門, "竹嶋紀事Ⅰ・Ⅱ" (2013)
  22. "「近世資料」『鳥取県史』第7巻", ~ (1976)
  23. "「竹島渡海禁止并渡海沿革」『鳥取藩史』第6巻", ~ (1971)
  24. "「朝鮮國部百十三」『通航一覧』巻137 (大正2年)", ~
  25. "「日本海内竹島外一島地籍編纂方伺」『公文録』内務省之部", ~ (1877)
  26. "「朝鮮国交際始末内探書」『大日本外交文書』", ~ (1870)
  27. "竹島"[URL]
  28. "竹島=独島論争(資料集)"[URL]
  29. "竹島問題"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)