범죄예방을 위한 개인정보 수집 및 활용에 대한 통제- 9.11테러 전후 미국의 개인정보법제의 변화와 그 의미를 중심으로 -
Control over the Collection and Utilization of Personal Information for the Crime Prevention
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the Unitied State, the protection of personal information is interpreted in privacy protection problem. This access mode is a noticeable in a communication region and is confirmed by various contents of「Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act」,「Electronic Communication Privacy Act(ECPA)」,「Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act」,「Communication Assistance for Law Enforcement Act」. But this access mode has changed after Sep. 11 terror attacks. An example of that changes is the enactment of 「Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act」,so-called 「USA Patriot Act」. This act was based on the tough anti-terrorism policies of the U. S. post Sep. 11 terror. In terms of that contents, it drew international criticism, with some saying it could violate the people's basic human rights. On the other hand, we have been prompt in dealing with the changes of the society and the social need to protect a personal information through making laws such as 「Protection of Communications Secrets Act」, 「Protection of Personal Information Act」,「Law on the protection and use of location information」,However, on this legislative responses, there have been criticisms ① that it has poor content in respect of the procedural restriction and regulation, ② that it can cause problems of the coherence on interpretations and the confusion on applications of law in relations terms.
Abstract
In the Unitied State, the protection of personal information is interpreted in privacy protection problem. This access mode is a noticeable in a communication region and is confirmed by various contents of「Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act」,「Electronic Communication Privacy Act(ECPA)」,「Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act」,「Communication Assistance for Law Enforcement Act」. But this access mode has changed after Sep. 11 terror attacks. An example of that changes is the enactment of 「Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act」,so-called 「USA Patriot Act」. This act was based on the tough anti-terrorism policies of the U. S. post Sep. 11 terror. In terms of that contents, it drew international criticism, with some saying it could violate the people's basic human rights. On the other hand, we have been prompt in dealing with the changes of the society and the social need to protect a personal information through making laws such as 「Protection of Communications Secrets Act」, 「Protection of Personal Information Act」,「Law on the protection and use of location information」,However, on this legislative responses, there have been criticisms ① that it has poor content in respect of the procedural restriction and regulation, ② that it can cause problems of the coherence on interpretations and the confusion on applications of law in relations terms.
참고문헌 (17)
- 방송통신위원회, "위치정보의 보호 및 이용 등에 관한 법률 해설서", ~ (2010)
- 정보통신부, "위치정보의 보호 및 이용 등에 관한 법률 해설서", ~ (2007)
- 함인선, "정보사회와 법" (2012), 전남대학교출판부
- 나채준, "미국과 우리나라의 통신감청법률에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 토지공법연구, 52, pp.329~356 (2011), 한국토지공법학회
- 박경신, "미국의 통신비밀보호법(ECPA) 및 범죄수사 통신지원법(CALEA)과 우리나라의 통신 비밀보호법 및 18대 국회 개정안의 비교검토", 안암법학, (29), pp.119~160 (2009), 안암법학회
- 成 鮮 濟, "e-사회에서 테러 및 범죄예방을 위한 감청과 프라이버시의 갈등 조정 방안 연구", 공법학연구, 8(4), pp.163~190 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
- 신유섭, "국내 정보활동과 기본권: 미국의 사례를 통해 본 교훈", 한국과 국제정치, 24(2), pp.171~197 (2008), 극동문제연구소
- 임규철, "각 국의 개인정보보호법제 비교연구― 미국과 유럽연합의 개인정보보호법제를 중심으로 ―", 공법연구, 31(5), pp.4~4 (2003), 한국공법학회
- 윤태영, "지능형 도로환경에서의 위치추적과 프라이버시 보호 - 미국의 최근 판례를 소재로 하여 -", 경찰법연구, 8(1), pp.81~106 (2010), 한국경찰법학회
- 장교식, "스마트폰 위치정보보호에 관한 법적 고찰", 토지공법연구, 54, pp.333~352 (2011), 한국토지공법학회
- 제성호, "미국의 반테러법과 우리에 대한 시사점", 중앙법학, 5(3) (2003)
- B. Dawn Medlin, "Information Communication Technology Law, Protection and Access Right", Information Science Reference, ~ (2010)
- Elliot D. Cohen, "Mass Surveillance and State Control-The Total Information Awareness Project-", ~ (2010)
- Gerald Gunter, "Constitutional Law, University Casebook Series 13th ed" (1997)
- Howell Beryl, "Seven Weeks : The Making of the USA PATRIOT Act", George Washington Law Review, 72 (2004)
- Louis B. Swartz, "Information Communication Technology Law, Protection and Access Right", Information Science Reference, ~ (2010)
- Solove Daniel, "Information Privacy Law" (2003)