Theoretical Reflections on New Urban Development, Financing Urban Public Facilities, and Impact Fees
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper theoretically explores the relationships among new urban development, financing urban public facilities, and impact fees. Local governments face a dilemma of escalating demands for public facilities and services caused by new development without having sufficient revenues to finance these demands. Existing residents are resistant to higher taxes and fees to fund the services and improvements required by new residents. As a consequence of this problem, there is considerable interest in impact fees since impact fees are viewed as a way to ‘growth pay its way.’ It is safe to predict that local governments will increasingly turn to new sources of revenues such as impact fees to finance capital needs brought on by rapid growth. Impact fees raise such fundamental social questions as: Who really pays? How is the fee calculated? Where does the money go? How and where is it spent? Who really benefits from the new or expanded public facilities? What is the impact on housing costs? How is business generation or expansion affected? How does an impact fee policy mesh with a community’s and region’s affordable housing policy? Is new development being required to pay its fair share, or something more?
Abstract
This paper theoretically explores the relationships among new urban development, financing urban public facilities, and impact fees. Local governments face a dilemma of escalating demands for public facilities and services caused by new development without having sufficient revenues to finance these demands. Existing residents are resistant to higher taxes and fees to fund the services and improvements required by new residents. As a consequence of this problem, there is considerable interest in impact fees since impact fees are viewed as a way to ‘growth pay its way.’ It is safe to predict that local governments will increasingly turn to new sources of revenues such as impact fees to finance capital needs brought on by rapid growth. Impact fees raise such fundamental social questions as: Who really pays? How is the fee calculated? Where does the money go? How and where is it spent? Who really benefits from the new or expanded public facilities? What is the impact on housing costs? How is business generation or expansion affected? How does an impact fee policy mesh with a community’s and region’s affordable housing policy? Is new development being required to pay its fair share, or something more?
참고문헌 (33)
- Altshuler, A., "Regulation for Revenue: The Political Economy of Land Use Exactions" (1993), Brookings Institution
- Barnebey, M., "Paying for growth: community approaches to development impact fees", Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(1), pp.18~28 (1988)
- Been, V., "Impact fees and housing affordability", Cityscape, 8(1), pp.139~185 (2005)
- Blaesser, B., "Impact fees: the second generation, Washington Univ", Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 38(Fall), pp.55~113 (1990)
- Brueckner, J., "Infrastructure financing and urban development: the economics of impact fees", Journal of Public Economics, 66(3), pp.383~407 (1997)
- Burchell, R., "Development Impact Assessment Handbook" (1994), Urban Land Institute
- Burge, G., "The capitalization effects of school, residential, and commercial impact fees on undeveloped land values", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 44, pp.1~13 (2014)
- Burge, G., "Impact fees and singlefamily home construction", Journal of Urban Economics, 60(2), pp.284~306 (2006)
- Burge, G., "Promoting sustainable land development patterns through impact fee programs", Cityscape, 15(1), pp.83~105 (2013)
- Burge, G., "Effects of proportionate share impact fees", Housing Policy Debate, 18(4), pp.679~710 (2007)
- Burge, G., "Can development impact fees help mitigate urban sprawl?", Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(3), pp.235~248 (2013)
- Delaney, J., "The needsnexus analysis: a unified test for validating subdivision exactions, user impact fees and linkage", Laws and Contemporary Problems, 50(1), pp.5~194 (1987)
- Finkle, J., "Development Fees: Sharing the Costs of Growth" (1988), National Council for Urban Economic Development
- Gowder, W., "Recent developments in exactions and impact fees: who pays for new schools, fair housing, and clean air?", The Urban Lawyer, 42(3), pp.615~625 (2010)
- Kelsey, T., "The fiscal impacts of alternative land uses: what do costs of community service studies really tell us?", Journal of the Community Development Society, 27(1), pp.78~89 (1996)
- Levine, J., "Equity in infrastructure finance: when are impact fees justified", Land Economics, 70(2), pp.210~222 (1994)
- Lillydahl, J., "The need for a standard state impact fee enabling act", Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(1), pp.7~17 (1988)
- Mathur, S., "Do impact fees raise the price of existing housing?", Housing Policy Debate, 18(4), pp.635~659 (2007)
- Mathur, S., "Do all impact fees affect housing prices the same?", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(4), pp.442~455 (2013)
- McKay, P., "Understanding Impact Fees" (1986), Bureau of Economic and Business Research, College of Business Administration, University of Florida
- Mulcahy, C., "Impact fees for a developing Wisconsin", Marquette Law Review, 79(Spring), pp.759~817 (1996)
- National Association of Home Builders, "Impact Fee Handbook" (1997), Home Builder Press
- Nelson, A., "Development impact fees", Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(1), pp.3~6 (1988)
- Nicholas, J., "The Calculation of Proportionate-share Impact Fees" (1988), American Planning Association
- Nicholas, J., "A Practitioner’s Guide to Development Impact Fees" (1991), Planners Press
- O’Connell, L., "Exploring the contribution of state and local-level conditions to the adoption of different types of smart growth policies and impact fees in the United States", International Journal of Public Administration, 35(3), pp.194~203 (2012)
- Peiser, R., "Calculating equity-neutral water and sewer impact fees", Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(1), pp.38~48 (1988)
- Robinson, S., "Building Together: Investing in Community Infrastructure" (1990), Government Finance Officers Association
- 류연택, "미국 메트로폴리탄 지역에서의 도시 공간 생산,Development Impact Fees, 사회경제적 형평성에 관한 담론", 한국도시지리학회지, 6(1), pp.5~67 (2003), 한국도시지리학회
- 류연택, "도시 주택 및 거주지 분리에 관한 이론적 고찰", 한국도시지리학회지, 16(3), pp.195~211 (2013), 한국도시지리학회
- 류연택, "Theoretical Reflections on the Political Economy Perspectives on Urban Housing and Urbanization", 한국도시지리학회지, 17(2), pp.163~176 (2014), 한국도시지리학회
- Taub, T., "Exactions, linkage, and regulatory takings", The Urban Lawyer, 20(3), pp.515~540 (1988)
- Wellner, A., "Alternatives to Sprawl" (1996), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy