본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Theoretical Reflections on the Calculation of Development Impact Fees

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지리학

초록

This paper theoretically explores the calculation of development impact fees focusing on urban growth, new urban development, developer, urban planner, housing, real estate market, community planning, community financing, local government, land use planning, public facilities, and development cost. Many questions related to who bears the burden of paying impact fees beg for answers based on empirical analysis. Those questions involve the extent to which landowners bear the burden, the effect of different levels of impact fees on the socioeconomic mix of communities, the distribution of fiscal benefits within a region where urban communities assess different levels of impact fees, and the preparedness of urban communities to accommodate development displaced by impact fees. Broader questions also relate to how urban and regional form is affected by differential application of impact fees throughout an area and whether money gained from the impact fees makes regional growth more or less efficient. Who ultimately pays development impact fees? There has been little empirical evaluation of how the market responds to development impact fees, but there is considerable information to suggest that, on the whole, the occupants – residents and users – pay the majority of the development impact fees.

Abstract

This paper theoretically explores the calculation of development impact fees focusing on urban growth, new urban development, developer, urban planner, housing, real estate market, community planning, community financing, local government, land use planning, public facilities, and development cost. Many questions related to who bears the burden of paying impact fees beg for answers based on empirical analysis. Those questions involve the extent to which landowners bear the burden, the effect of different levels of impact fees on the socioeconomic mix of communities, the distribution of fiscal benefits within a region where urban communities assess different levels of impact fees, and the preparedness of urban communities to accommodate development displaced by impact fees. Broader questions also relate to how urban and regional form is affected by differential application of impact fees throughout an area and whether money gained from the impact fees makes regional growth more or less efficient. Who ultimately pays development impact fees? There has been little empirical evaluation of how the market responds to development impact fees, but there is considerable information to suggest that, on the whole, the occupants – residents and users – pay the majority of the development impact fees.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Been, V., "Impact fees and housing affordability", Cityscape, 8(1), pp.139~185 (2005)
  2. Bluffstone, R., "Housing, sprawl, and the use of development impact fees : the case of the inland empire", Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(3), pp.433~447 (2008)
  3. Burge, G., "The capitalization effects of school, residential, and commercial impact fees on undeveloped land values", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 44, pp.1~13 (2014)
  4. Burge, G., "Impact fees and single-family home construction", Journal of Urban Economics, 60(2), pp.284~306 (2006)
  5. Burge, G., "The effects of impact fees on multifamily housing construction", Journal of Regional Science, 46(1), pp.5~23 (2006)
  6. Burge, G., "Development impact fees and employment", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(1), pp.54~62 (2009)
  7. Burge, G., "Promoting sustainable land development patterns through impact fee programs", Cityscape, 15(1), pp.83~105 (2013)
  8. Burge, G, "Effects of proportionate-share impact fees", Housing Policy Debate, 18(4), pp.679~710 (2007)
  9. and Nicholas, J. C., "Can development impact fees help mitigate urban sprawl?", Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(3), pp.235~248 (2013)
  10. Gowder, W., "Recent developments in exactions and impact fees : who pays for new schools, fair housing, and clean air?", The Urban Lawyer, 42(3), pp.615~625 (2010)
  11. Ihlanfeldt, K., "An empirical investigation of the effects of impact fees on housing and land markets", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(6), pp.639~661 (2004)
  12. Jeong, M. G., "Local choices for development impact fees", Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), pp.338~357 (2006)
  13. Jeong, M. G., "Impact fees, growth management, and development : a contractual approach to local policy and governance", Urban Affairs Review, 41(6), pp.749~768 (2006)
  14. Jones, A. T., "Impact fees and employment growth", Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4), pp.341~346 (2015)
  15. 김민영, "국제결혼이주여성의 지역적 분포와 사회·경제적 특성 -충청북도를 대상지역으로-", 한국경제지리학회지, 15(4), pp.676~694 (2012), 한국경제지리학회[DOI]
  16. Lawhon, L. L., "Overcoming potential exclusivity associated with impact fees : Loveland, Colorado’s 30-year experience in development impact fees", Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 32(3), pp.217~233 (2015)
  17. Lee, Y., "A multilevel governance and growth management : the use of impact fees by Florida cities", Economic Development Quarterly, 28(4), pp.328~338 (2014)
  18. Mathur, S., "Do impact fees raise the price of existing housing?", Housing Policy Debate, 18(4), pp.635~659 (2007)
  19. Mathur, S., "Do all impact fees affect housing prices the same?", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(4), pp.442~455 (2013)
  20. Mathur, S., "Designing an impact fee program to meet rational nexus principle and reduce vertical inequity : key insights for developing countries", Public Works Management & Policy, 21(4), pp.324~345 (2016)
  21. Mathur, S., "Factors that influence a jurisdiction’s probability of charging impact fees", Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(3), pp.110~115 (2009)
  22. Nelson, A. C., "A Guide to Impact Fees and Housing Affordability" (2012), Island Press
  23. Nelson, A. C., "Impact Fees : Principles and Practice of Proportionate Share Development Fees" (2017), Routledge
  24. Nicholas, J. C., "Development Impact Fees: Policy Rationale, Practice, Theory and Issues", pp.171~187 (1988), Planners Press
  25. Nicholas, J. C., "A Practitioner’s Guide to Development Impact Fees" (1991), Planners Press
  26. O’Connell, L., "Exploring the contribution of state and local-level conditions to the adoption of different types of smart growth policies and impact fees in the United States", International Journal of Public Administration, 35(3), pp.194~203 (2012)
  27. 류연택, "미국 메트로폴리탄 지역에서의 도시 공간 생산,Development Impact Fees, 사회경제적 형평성에 관한 담론", 한국도시지리학회지, 6(1), pp.5~67 (2003), 한국도시지리학회
  28. 류연택, "도심 재활성화를 위한 사회자본 및 파트너십 형성", 한국경제지리학회지, 12(1), pp.38~55 (2009), 한국경제지리학회[DOI]
  29. 류연택, "Theoretical Reflections on New Urban Development, Financing Urban Public Facilities, and Impact Fees", 한국도시지리학회지, 18(3), pp.183~196 (2015), 한국도시지리학회
  30. 류연택, "개발부담금의 형평성 이슈, 장단점, 법적 근거, 미국의 사례", 한국도시지리학회지, 19(3), pp.131~144 (2016), 한국도시지리학회[DOI]
  31. Wiener, O., "High Impact Fee Negotiation and Management for Professionals : How to Get, Set, and Keep the Fees You’re Worth" (2017), Kogan Page
  32. York, A. M., "What determines public support for graduated development impact fees?", State & Local Government Review, 49(1), pp.15~26 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)