중국 민상법체계에서의 상사주체 －한국 상법과의 비교－
A Study on Commercial Agent in Chinese Legal System - Comparative Study on the Korean Commercial Act - (中国民商事法体系上的商事主体-与韩国商法比较研究-)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chinese private law takes combination of civil and commercial code. Since in China, there are various legal agents that don’t exist in other countries,whenever foreign investors who are familiar with civil law system sign contracts, they have questions about other chinese party has a qualification as a commercial merchant and their legal actions are admitted as commercial transactions. These matters are derived from the fact that there is no clear legislation for commercial merchants. Commercial merchant is not a legal concept in Chinese private law as well as there is no regulation about commercial transactions. Also, there are many discussions on position of the commercial code. There are two kinds of opinions. One is commercial code which puts within civil code(unification legislation). The other is separate legislation. These discussions are based on whether the concept of commercial merchant or commercial act is admitted or not. If the concept of commercial merchant or commercial act is admitted, commercial code could be independent from civil code. I support independent commercial code, because various commercial merchants are practically exist in China and each law admits commercial merchants. China takes requisite for establishment in effect of commercial registration,therefore commercial agents who don't get commercial registration couldn’t do business, and the principle of public confidence on registration should be admitted.
Abstract
Chinese private law takes combination of civil and commercial code. Since in China, there are various legal agents that don’t exist in other countries,whenever foreign investors who are familiar with civil law system sign contracts, they have questions about other chinese party has a qualification as a commercial merchant and their legal actions are admitted as commercial transactions. These matters are derived from the fact that there is no clear legislation for commercial merchants. Commercial merchant is not a legal concept in Chinese private law as well as there is no regulation about commercial transactions. Also, there are many discussions on position of the commercial code. There are two kinds of opinions. One is commercial code which puts within civil code(unification legislation). The other is separate legislation. These discussions are based on whether the concept of commercial merchant or commercial act is admitted or not. If the concept of commercial merchant or commercial act is admitted, commercial code could be independent from civil code. I support independent commercial code, because various commercial merchants are practically exist in China and each law admits commercial merchants. China takes requisite for establishment in effect of commercial registration,therefore commercial agents who don't get commercial registration couldn’t do business, and the principle of public confidence on registration should be admitted.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강위두, "상법강의(상)" (2009), 형설출판사
- 서돈각, "상법강의(상권)" (1999), 법문사
- 이정표, "중국 회사법" (2002), 박영사
- 정경영, "상법학강의" (2007), 박영사
- 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2003), 법문사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 王利明, "民法典體系硏究" (2008), 中國人民大學出版社
- 徐民, "商法學" (2010), 法律出版社
- 方嘉民, "商事法槪論" (1999), 天津社會科學院出版社
- 王保樹, "中國商法" (2010), 人民法院出版社
- 范健, "商法學" (2010), 法律出版社
- 雷興虎, "商法學敎程" (2007), 中國政法大學出版社
- 周林彬, "商法與企業經營" (2010), 北京大學出版社
- 施天濤, "商法學" (2010), 法律出版社
- 李玉泉, "中國商事法" (1995), 武漢大學出版社
- 蔣大興, "公司法的展開與評判" (2001), 法律出版社
- 이정표, "중국 기업법체계에서 기업의 유형과 특징에 관한 小考", 기업법연구, 11, pp.67~96 (2002), 한국기업법학회
- "论我国商事主体范围的界定"[URL]
- "论商法的独立性; 以商事主体（商人）为中心（一）"[URL]
- "反思商法的法律地位"[URL]