中国民法典编纂中的立法模式悖论 ——基于商法规范如何安排的视角
On the Choice of Legislative Mode in the Codification of Civil Law in China —Based on the Perspective of Commercial Norms
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
在民法典立法中，商事法律处于何种位置？这一问题解决的好坏将直接关系到民法典立法的成败，甚至影响中国法治进程、影响中国市场经济的发展。中国大陆民事立法模式既非民商分立也非民商合一，在民法典立法思路上坚持民商合一的模式，却选择民商分立模式下的民法典作为范本，在逻辑上存在悖论。民法典立法不是要适当增加商法规则，而是要根据商事活动的需要，实现民法与商法的体系化，这完全是因为商法规则的特殊性决定的。民法典应该具有开放性，以适应复杂多变的现实。
Abstract
What is the position of commercial law in the codification of civil law? This problem will be directly related to the success or failure of the codification, and even affect the process of China's rule of law and the development of China's market economy. The mode of civil legislation in mainland China is neither the separation of civil law and commercial law nor their unification, while in the codification of civil law, people insist on the pattern of their unification, chose the civil code under the pattern of civil and commercial separation as a model, which is a logical paradox. The legislation of civil code is not to increase the rules of commercial law, but to realize the systematization of civil law and commercial law according to the needs of commercial activities which is entirely due to the particularity of the rules of commercial law. The civil code should be open to adapt to the complex and changeable reality.
참고문헌 (10)
- 谢怀栻, "大陆法国家民法典研究", 外国法译评, (2) (1995)
- 凌斌, "编纂民法典：民族生活的法律归宿", 中国法律评论, (4) (2014)
- 王利明, "加快民法典制定 促进法律体系完善", 法制资讯, (Z1) (2014)
- 江平, "制定一部开放型的民法典", 政法论坛, (1) (2003)
- C.W.卡纳里斯, "德国商法" (2006), 法律出版社
- 崔建远, "编纂民法典必须摆正几对关系", 清华法学, (6) (2014)
- 梁慧星, "制定民法典的设想", 现代法学, (2) (2001)
- 马克斯·韦伯, "法律社会学" (2005), 广西师范大学出版社
- 弗朗茨 维亚克尔, "近代私法史——以德意志的发展为考察重点" (2006), 上海三联书店
- 郭锋, "民商分立与民商合一的理论评析", 中国法学, (5) (1996)