본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기독교 생명윤리적 관점에서 본 존엄사

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

Developed medicine and treatment extend human life and retain death of patient. If we use this treatment we can recover the impossible patient in the past and we can prolong the unnatural death of the patient. Therefore we face various ethical problems about death with dignity. In this paper, I criticise several problems of death with dignity and seek solutions from the perspective of the christian bioethics. And I propose the proper practical solution about death with dignity. Death with dignity means to die with dignity, that is a humane death. This is not a new idea apart from euthanasia but very similar with it. We use death with dignity on purpose to separate from the negative image of euthanasia. And also we reveal the positive image of it to respect the autonomy of the patient. According to the principle of autonomy, we should respect the opinion of the irrecoverable patient long term will to die with no pain. And when we judge patient's quality of life we could agree with his death. Instead of meaningless treatment that will merely extend the pain through to death, we can allow him to die. We can regard this as a act of mercy because we reduce his pain and guide to his death with dignity. But autonomous human's right only could be justified to realize for the more valuable of dignity of life. The value of life has priority over quality of life. The solution for patient's pain is not legalization of death with dignity but care and concern for patient by using pain-killers. Therefore we should have a responsible attitude for life based on biocracy. Nevertheless, if there is a serious patient who suffers terrible pain with a coma situation, and special medical treatment for him not only increases his pain but also sustains his dying and dehumanizes him, it may be right to withdraw all special medical treatment and allow to let him die naturally. At that time, we must provide food, water, air like a natural treatment, and give a clean environment and respect him by continual care and communication with him. This is an appropriate steward's attitude towards life.

Abstract

Developed medicine and treatment extend human life and retain death of patient. If we use this treatment we can recover the impossible patient in the past and we can prolong the unnatural death of the patient. Therefore we face various ethical problems about death with dignity. In this paper, I criticise several problems of death with dignity and seek solutions from the perspective of the christian bioethics. And I propose the proper practical solution about death with dignity. Death with dignity means to die with dignity, that is a humane death. This is not a new idea apart from euthanasia but very similar with it. We use death with dignity on purpose to separate from the negative image of euthanasia. And also we reveal the positive image of it to respect the autonomy of the patient. According to the principle of autonomy, we should respect the opinion of the irrecoverable patient long term will to die with no pain. And when we judge patient's quality of life we could agree with his death. Instead of meaningless treatment that will merely extend the pain through to death, we can allow him to die. We can regard this as a act of mercy because we reduce his pain and guide to his death with dignity. But autonomous human's right only could be justified to realize for the more valuable of dignity of life. The value of life has priority over quality of life. The solution for patient's pain is not legalization of death with dignity but care and concern for patient by using pain-killers. Therefore we should have a responsible attitude for life based on biocracy. Nevertheless, if there is a serious patient who suffers terrible pain with a coma situation, and special medical treatment for him not only increases his pain but also sustains his dying and dehumanizes him, it may be right to withdraw all special medical treatment and allow to let him die naturally. At that time, we must provide food, water, air like a natural treatment, and give a clean environment and respect him by continual care and communication with him. This is an appropriate steward's attitude towards life.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 구영모, "안락사의 도덕적 허용여부", 신학과철학 (2000), 서강대 신학연구소
  2. 김익현, "도덕적 지위와 안락사", 시대와 철학, 17(3), pp.61~80 (2006), 한국철학사상연구회
  3. 김상득, "안락사는 성경에 어긋나는가", 신앙과학문 (1996), 기독교학문연구회
  4. 나달숙, "자기결정권", 사회과학연구 (2003), 안양대 사회과학연구소
  5. 노종호, "도덕적 이슈의 정책의제형성과정에 관한 연구: 소극적 안락사를 중심으로", 정부학연구, 14(2), pp.161~185 (2008), 정부학연구소
  6. 문성학, "현대인의 삶과 윤리" (2001), 형설출판사
  7. 문시영, "존엄사, 교회에 생명의 길을 묻다" (2009), 북코리아
  8. 신동일, "사전진료지시서: 법이론과 현실", 안암법학, (28), pp.229~254 (2009), 안암법학회
  9. 오진탁, "죽음을 맞이하는 방식", 중국철학 (2002), 중국철학회
  10. 우재명, "안락사와 연명치료중단의 윤리", 신학과철학 (2005), 서강대 신학연구소
  11. 이동익, "생명의 관리자" (2003), 가톨릭출판사
  12. 이인영, "미국의 자연사법(natural death act) 규범과 의료인의 면책규정이 주는 시사점", 비교형사법연구, 10(1), pp.481~508 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
  13. 이종원, "안락사의 윤리적 문제", 철학탐구, 21, pp.155~188 (2007), 중앙철학연구소
  14. 이종원, "기독교 생명윤리적 관점에서 본 소극적 안락사", 대학과 선교, 12, pp.269~295 (2007), 한국대학선교학회
  15. 이진우, "도덕의 담론" (1997), 문예출판사
  16. 이한규, "안락사(euthanasia)에 대한 역사적 해석과 법적 고찰", 법학논총, 24(4), pp.151~172 (2007), 법학연구소
  17. 임종식, "안락사 정당화될 수 있는가", 과학사상, (28) (1999), 범양사
  18. Doka K. J., "죽음학의 이해" (2006), 인간사랑
  19. Orr, Robert, "생명윤리의 고민:삶과 죽음의 문제" (1997), 생명의 말씀사
  20. Schaeffer, F. A., "안락사에 대한 그리스도인의 태도", 상담과선교 (1999)
  21. Schaeffer, F. A., "그리스도인의 생명윤리" (1995), 한국로고스연구원
  22. Singer, Peter, "실천윤리학" (1991), 철학과 현실사
  23. Teichman, Jenny, "사회윤리" (2001), 백의
  24. Beyleveld D., "Huaman Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw" (2001), Oxford University Press
  25. Brock, Dan W., "Voluntary Active Euthanasia in: Intervention and Reflection", pp.2004, Wadsworth
  26. Dworkin, G., "Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  27. Gay-Williams, J., "The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia in: Today's Moral Issues" (2002), Mc-Graw-Hill Companies
  28. Geisler, Norman L., "Christian Ethics" (1989), Baker Book House Company
  29. Hinman, L. M., "Contemporary Moral Issues" (2000), Prentice Hall
  30. Keown, John, "Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  31. May, William E., "Catholic Bioethics and the Gift of Human Life" (2000), Our Sunday Visitor, Inc.
  32. Munson, Ronald, "Intervention and Reflection", pp.2004, Wadsworth
  33. Pojman, Louis P., "Life and Death" (2000), Wadworth Publishing Company
  34. Rachels, James, "Active and Passive Euthanasia in: Applied EthicsⅡ" (2002), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)