从“情理法”到“法治生活方式” - 中国法观念的发展逻辑 -
From “Human Feelings, Reasons and the Law” to “Rule of Law Lifestyle”- The Development Logic of Chinese Legal Concept -
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
传统中国是“情理法”社会,法律与道德情感紧密联系,形成独具特色的法律观念. 与此不同的是,现代法治重视民众权利与义务,呈现出与传统“情理法”不同的价值与观念. 论文以中国法律观念中传统“情理法”向现代“法治生活方式”转变为核心,分为六个部分. 第一部分简述现有法治生活方式的研究成果,主要包括什么是法治生活方式,怎样实现法治生活方式的问题. 第二部分将传统“情理法”与现代“法治生活方式”相比较,分析二者具有的差异,从而显示出“法治生活方式”具有的核心优点,主要包括法律的地位、公平与正义问题、以及“人治”与“法治”问题. 第三部分主要论述从“情理法”向“法治生活方式”转变之核心,也就是“以人为本”的价值观. 鉴于中国法及其实践中“以人为本”有待完善,需要关注价值观及其实践等层面. 第四部分论述权力限制在中国法观念发展中的关键地位,从权利本位、权限规范、依法惩治等方面展开. 第五部分阐述公民参与在养成“法治生活方式”中的作用,并且提出完善建议,在公民参与中增强主观程序正义,凸显“法治生活方式”的优势. 第六部分是论文结语,进一步分析了中国法律观念正在发生的积极转变,尽管这一路程并不平坦,在“历史的桎梏”与“文化的牵绊”下,中国法观念与法治生活方式的塑造依旧有很长的路要走.
Abstract
Traditional China is a “human feelings, reasons and the law” society, law is closely related to moral emotions, formed a unique legal concept. In contrast, the modern rule of law values the rights and obligations of the people, presenting a different value and concept from the traditional “human feelings, reasons and the law”. The paper takes the turning from traditional “human feelings, reasons and the law” to the modern “rule of law” as the core, divided into six parts. The first part briefly described the research results of the existing rule of law lifestyle, including what is the rule of law lifestyle and how to achieve the rule of law lifestyle. The second part compared the traditional “human feelings reasons and the law ”with the modern “rule of law lifestyle”, analyzed the differences between the two, shows the core advantages of the “rule of law lifestyle”, including the status of law, the issue of fairness and justice, and the issues of “rule of man” or “rule of law”. The third part mainly discussed the core of the transition from “human feelings, “human feelings, reasons and the law ”to “rule of law lifestyle”, that is, the “people-oriented” value. In view of the fact that “people-oriented” needs to be in Chinese law and its practice, it is necessary to start from the values to the practice. The four part discussed the key position of power restriction in the development of Chinese legal concept, from the aspects of rights standard authority regulation, and punishment according to law. The fifth part expounded the role of citizen participation in the development of “rule of law”, and propose perfect suggestions to enhance subjective procedural justice in citizen participation and highlight the advantages of “rule of law lifestyle”. In the last conclusion part, we further analyzed the positive changes that are taking place in China’s legal concept. Although this distance is not smooth, under the “history of shackles” and “cultural ties”, the concept of Chinese rule of law and lifestyle is still waiting for shaping, there is a long way to go.
참고문헌 (18)
- 托马斯, "公共决策中的公民参与" (2016), 中国人民大学出版社
- 孟德斯鸠, "论法的精神(上册)" (1982), 商务印书馆
- 阿克顿, "自由与权力" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 诺内特, "转变中的法律与社会:迈向回应型法" (2004), 中国政法大学出版社
- 范忠信, "情理法与中国人——中国传统法律文化探微" (1992), 中国人民大学出版社
- 瞿同祖, "中国法律与中国社会" (2010), 商务印书馆
- 杨鹤皋, "中国法律思想通史" (2011), 湘潭大学出版社
- 苏力, "法治及其本土资源" (2015), 北京大学出版社
- 马长山, "法律的‘人本精神’与依法治理", 法制与社会发展, (4) (2004)
- 江必新, "法治精神的属性、内涵与弘扬", 法学家, (4) (2013)
- 姜明安, "改革、法治与国家治理现代化", 中共中央党校学报, (4) (2014)
- 严存生, "理性认识法治理想", 北方法学, (1) (2015)
- 陈思明, "论法治宣传教育清单化", 学术交流, (2) (2016)
- 黄伟文, "司法裁判与法律的客观性", 学术论坛, (7) (2016)
- 张超, "正义感、移情与司法裁判", 北方法学, (3) (2017)
- 杨建军, "中国法治发展:一般性与特殊性之兼容", 比较法研究, (4) (2017)
- 李德顺, "论民主与法治不可分——‘法治中国’的几个基本理念之辩", 中共中央党校学报, (1) (2017)
- 郭春镇, "感知的程序正义——主观程序正义及其建构", 法制与社会发展, (2) (2017)
