본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 사회책임위원회제도의 도입 검토

An Introduction to Committee of Social Responsibility for Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility (在中国对企业社会责任引进社会责任委员会制度的思考)

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The concept of “Corporate Social Responsibility”was introduced in China after reform and openness Particularly, joining WTO in 2001 and the globalization of the economy have decisive effect on emerging the concept of corporate social responsibility in earnest. In China, the unique form of corporate social responsibility, which is different from other capitalist countries, had existed from the past, but has developed in a different way on the basis of the unique economy system derived from social responsibility. After corporate social responsibility was stipulated under Article 5 of amended Chinese Company Law of 2005, the discussion on the way how to impose social responsibility to a company has been carried on considerably at the various fields. Especially, the positive response of economic community to it as competitively announcing the reports on it will represent the company’s decision and actions. Chinese government and leaders also emphasize corporate social responsibility in the political document or discourse as an important issue. Overall, the discussion can be seen that a particular corporate or country tends to deal with corporate social responsibility politically, or to manage it at the international level as a strategic way. In fact, the corporate social responsibility is a macro-social responsibility basically, involving economic and political features. However, it does not regulate the specific behavior of the company effectively, as well as it does not carry effective and preventive binding measures to make miro-management decisions, though its surface feature is frightening as a “tiger without teeth.” Besides, the corporate social responsibility report each company announced has become a new type of company advertisement. In order to become it as a “tiger with teeth”,therefore, academia, economic and legal community should continuously make an effort to research on it. In China, most legal scholars still raise a question whether the corporate social responsibility stipulated in Article 5 of new Chinese Company Law could be a trial nom, because they consider that it only exists in the moral provision or legal principle. Then, how a company could realize corporate social responsibility in the process to make a management decision? A company should take priority to acknowledge the validity of corporate social responsibility as a trial nom. Based on it, the company should find rational solutions how to implement the corporate social responsibility. To establish Committee of Social Responsibility under board of directors of a company or to improve corporate governance could be one of the solutions.

Abstract

The concept of “Corporate Social Responsibility”was introduced in China after reform and openness Particularly, joining WTO in 2001 and the globalization of the economy have decisive effect on emerging the concept of corporate social responsibility in earnest. In China, the unique form of corporate social responsibility, which is different from other capitalist countries, had existed from the past, but has developed in a different way on the basis of the unique economy system derived from social responsibility. After corporate social responsibility was stipulated under Article 5 of amended Chinese Company Law of 2005, the discussion on the way how to impose social responsibility to a company has been carried on considerably at the various fields. Especially, the positive response of economic community to it as competitively announcing the reports on it will represent the company’s decision and actions. Chinese government and leaders also emphasize corporate social responsibility in the political document or discourse as an important issue. Overall, the discussion can be seen that a particular corporate or country tends to deal with corporate social responsibility politically, or to manage it at the international level as a strategic way. In fact, the corporate social responsibility is a macro-social responsibility basically, involving economic and political features. However, it does not regulate the specific behavior of the company effectively, as well as it does not carry effective and preventive binding measures to make miro-management decisions, though its surface feature is frightening as a “tiger without teeth.” Besides, the corporate social responsibility report each company announced has become a new type of company advertisement. In order to become it as a “tiger with teeth”,therefore, academia, economic and legal community should continuously make an effort to research on it. In China, most legal scholars still raise a question whether the corporate social responsibility stipulated in Article 5 of new Chinese Company Law could be a trial nom, because they consider that it only exists in the moral provision or legal principle. Then, how a company could realize corporate social responsibility in the process to make a management decision? A company should take priority to acknowledge the validity of corporate social responsibility as a trial nom. Based on it, the company should find rational solutions how to implement the corporate social responsibility. To establish Committee of Social Responsibility under board of directors of a company or to improve corporate governance could be one of the solutions.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 이정표, "중국 회사법" (2008), 박영사
  2. 이철송, "제17판 회사법 강의", pp.56~ (2009), 박영사
  3. 임재연, "미국회사법" (1995), 박영사
  4. 임재연, "수정 제2판 미국회사법" (2006), 박영사
  5. 鄭燦亨, "第2版 會社法講義" (2002), 博英社
  6. 정희철, "企業法의 展開" (1979), 博英社
  7. 崔基元, "第12大訂版 新會社法論" (2005), 博英社
  8. 한대원, "현대 중국법개론" (2009), 박영사
  9. 기업의 사회적 책임: 국제논의 동향 및 우리의 대응방안, "고동수", 산업연구원, ~ (2006)
  10. 한국기업의 사회적 책임 및 정착방안에 관한 연구-경제정의지수를 중심으로-, "권오인", 서강대학교 경제대학원, ~ (2007)
  11. 김명중, "일본기업의 사회적 책임: 동향과 과제", 국제노동리프, 4(4), pp.20~ (2006)
  12. 김성은, "중국기업의 사회적 책임과 지배구조에 관한 연구", 경영법률, 19(2), pp.359~382 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
  13. 노명선, "회사범죄에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
  14. 손국호, "기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, pp.1982
  15. 장덕조, "기업의 사회적 책임-회사본질론을 중심으로-", 한국상사법학회 2010년 하계학슬대회
  16. 정대, "미국회사법상의 지명위원회에 관한 고찰", 기업법연구, 19(1)통권 : 20, pp.163~198 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  17. 정상은, "다국적기업의 중국 내 사회적 책임(CSR) 활동 분석", 국제지역연구, 11(1), pp.221~252 (2007), 국제지역연구센터
  18. 정운용, "기업의 사회적 책임 제고를 위한 형법정책", 박사, pp.2010
  19. 崔基元, "商法改正의 문제점에 관한 硏究", 法學, 18(2) (1978), 서울대학교
  20. 최준선, "기업의 사회적책임론", 성균관법학, 17(3), pp.471~506 (2005), 법학연구소
  21. 최준선, "기업의 부정과 기업의 사회적 책임", 성균관법학, 20(3), pp.871~891 (2008), 법학연구소
  22. 龜山孟司, "アメリカ會社法における取締役會の權限と運營", 法學新報, 106(7) (2000)
  23. 中村一彦, "現代的企業法論" (1982), 商事法務硏究會
  24. 河本一郞, "企業の社會的責任", ジェリスト, (578)
  25. 竹內昭夫, "會社法の根本的改正の問題點", ジェリスト, (593)
  26. 鈴木竹雄, "歷史はくり返す", ジェリスト, (578)
  27. 刘俊海, "新公司法的制度创新: 立法争点与解释难点" (2006), 法律出版社
  28. 刘俊海, "现代公司法" (2008), 法律出版社
  29. "考与立法建议 (四)"[URL]
  30. 周友苏, "新公司法论" (2006), 法律出版社
  31. 蒋大兴, "公司社会责任如何成为 “有呀的老虎” -董事会社会责任委员会之设计-", 清华法学, 3(4) (2009)
  32. 朱慈蕴, "公司的社会责任: 游走于法律责任与道德准则之间", 中外法学, (1) (2008)
  33. 张文显, "二十世纪西方法哲学思潮研究" (1996), 法律出版社
  34. 黄茂荣, "法学方法与现代民法" (2001), 中国政法大学出版社
  35. 顾功耘, "公司法律评论" (2007), 上海人民出版社
  36. 楼建泼, "公司治理原则:分析与建议(上卷)" (2006), 法律出版社
  37. 楼建泼, "企业社会责任专论" (2009), 北京大学出版社
  38. 楼建泼, "中国公司法第五条第一款的文义解释及实施路径-兼论道德层面的企业社会责任的意义-", 中外法学, 20(1) (2008)
  39. "中国中化集团公司 2007社会责任报告"[URL]
  40. 梁慧星, "民法总论" (1995), 法律出版社
  41. 徐国东, "民法基本原则解释-成文法局限性之克服" (1992), 中国政法大学出版社
  42. Geoffrey P. Lantos, "The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility", J. Consumer Marketing, 18, pp.595~ (2001)
  43. Archie B. Caroll, "A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance", Academy of Management Review, 4, pp.497~505 (1979)
  44. Adolf. A. Berle, Jr, "Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust", Harv. L. Rev, 44, pp.1049~ (1931)
  45. E. Merrick Dodd, Jr, "For Whom are Corporte Managers Trustees?", Harv. L. Rev, 45, pp.1145~ (1932)
  46. Adolf. A. Berle, Jr, "For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note", Harv. L. Rev, 45, pp.1365~ (1932)
  47. Berle, "The Moden Corporation and Private Property" (1932), Commerce Clearing House
  48. Statement of the Business Roundtable, "The Role and Composition of the Board of Directors of the Large Publicly Owned Corporation", Bus. Law, 33, pp.2083~ (1978)
  49. Li-Wen Lin, "Corporate Social Responsibility in China: Window Dressing or Structural Change?", Berkeley Journal of International Law (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)