知识产权使用规则研究
A research on the rules for use of intellectual property
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文分析了有形财产与智力成果两种不同类型财产的性质差异,认为这两种类型的财产存在着权利从属关系不同,权利边界的清晰程度不同,权利人的许可使用意愿不同,权利的明确性不同,侵权状态不同等多个不同点.从这一对比出发,作者提出智力成果的使用规则是知识产权权利规则中应当充分重视的制度.作者通过进一步对于知识产权权利规则特点的分析,以及对于知识产权排他性与请求权限制的研究,提出了建立知识产权使用规则的意义所在和基本原则.为建立知识产权使用规则,作者提出了若干完善知识产权制度的办法,如限制绝对禁止权的适用范围,建立智力成果授权使用的事先许可模式以及在著作权领域扩大作品使用范围的做法,试图通过这些制度性改革促进知识产权从长期注重专有性转而强化其使用性,促进知识产权使用规则的发展.
Abstract
In the article,through analysis of the nature difference of two different kinds of properties including tangible assets and intellectual achievements,it is presented that the rules for use of intellectual achievements is a system to which full importance should be attached in the rules for intellectual property.Through analysis of the features of the rules for intellectual property and the study on the exclusiveness of intellectual property and the restriction of claims,it is presented that the basic principles of the rules for use of intellectual property should be established and importance should be attached to establishing some systems.
참고문헌 (21)
- 李扬, "知识产权请求权的限制", 法商研究, 4 (2010)
- 杨志敏, "论知识产权法的目的及其实现途径", 电子知识产权 (2009)
- 梁志文, "反思知识产权请求权理论知识产权要挟策略与知识产权请求权的限制", 清华法学, 4 (2008)
- 杨才然, "洛克的知识产权正义论", 电子知识产权, 1 (2008)
- 彭学龙, "知识产权:自然权利亦或法定之权", 电子知识产权 (2007)
- 杨明, "知识产权请求权功能的解析与展开", 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1 (2006)
- 曹建明, "最高人民法院副院长曹建明在第二次全国法院知识产权审判工作会议上的讲话——求真务实, 锐意进取, 努力建设公正高效权威的知识产权审判制度", 北大法, ~ (2008)
- "律信息网"[URL]
- Adam Mossoff, "EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVE USE IN PATENT LAW", Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, (Spring) (2009)
- Avihay Dorfman, "COPYRIGHT AS TORT", Theoretical Inquiries in Law (2011)
- Henry E. Smith, "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS PROPERTY: DELINEATING ENTITLEMENTS IN INFORMATION", Yale Law Journal (2007)
- Henry E. Smith, "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS PROPERTY: DELINEATING ENTITLEMENTS IN INFORMATION", Yale Law Journal (2007)
- "126 S. Ct. 1837; 164 L. Ed. 2d 641; 2006 U. S. LEXIS 3872; 74 U. S. L. W. 4248", ~
- J. Scott Larson, "THE UNSETTLED AFTEREFFECTS OF eBAY AND SURVEY OF ITS CONTINUED US LITIGATION IMPACT", Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal (2010)
- John Tehranian, "PARCHMENT, PIXELS, & PERSONHOOD: USER RIGHTS AND THE IP (IDENTITY POLITICS) OF IP (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY)", University of Colorado Law Review, (Winter) (2011)
- Oskar Liivak, "RETHINKING THE CONCEPT OF EXCLUSION IN PATENT LAW", eorgetown Law Journal (2010)
- THE PROPERTY RIGHTS MOVEMENT'S EMBRACE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: TRUE LOVE OR DOOMED RELATIONSHIP?, "Peter S. Menell", UC Berkeley Public Law Research, ~, pp.Paper No. 965083
- Shyamkrishna Balganesh, "DEMYSTIFYING THE RIGHT TO EXCLUDE: OF PROPERTY, INVIOLABILITY, AND AUTOMATIC INJUNCTIONS", Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, (Spring) (2008)
- "Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co. , 136 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 1376 (N. D. Ga. 2001)", ~ (2001)
- Thomas F. Cotter, "TRANSFORMATIVE USE AND COGNIZABLE HARM", Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, (Summer) (2010)