평생 교육 관점에서 KBS 한국어능력시험의 문법 영역 분석
Analysis of the grammar area of KBS Korean Language Proficiency Test from the perspective of lifelong education
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to highlight the importance of the Korean Language Proficiency Test from the perspective of lifelong education and to analyze the grammar area of the KBS Korean Language Proficiency Test. To this end, first, the relationship between lifelong education and grammar ability was discussed. Next, questions in the grammar area of the KBS Korean Language Proficiency Test were analyzed based on the perspective of lifelong education. Questions in the areas of vocabulary, language norms, sentence expression, and Korean culture were analyzed and their characteristics were discussed. 1) It is composed of a method of measuring whether the question knows grammar correctly. 2) Examples containing the context of adult learners' daily lives are used, but the context is not diverse and is presented only at the sentence unit. 3) Questions about systematic knowledge of grammar are gradually decreasing. This result will help to explore the requirements of the Korean Language Proficiency Test from the perspective of lifelong education and suggest ways to improve the test.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to highlight the importance of the Korean Language Proficiency Test from the perspective of lifelong education and to analyze the grammar area of the KBS Korean Language Proficiency Test. To this end, first, the relationship between lifelong education and grammar ability was discussed. Next, questions in the grammar area of the KBS Korean Language Proficiency Test were analyzed based on the perspective of lifelong education. Questions in the areas of vocabulary, language norms, sentence expression, and Korean culture were analyzed and their characteristics were discussed. 1) It is composed of a method of measuring whether the question knows grammar correctly. 2) Examples containing the context of adult learners' daily lives are used, but the context is not diverse and is presented only at the sentence unit. 3) Questions about systematic knowledge of grammar are gradually decreasing. This result will help to explore the requirements of the Korean Language Proficiency Test from the perspective of lifelong education and suggest ways to improve the test.
참고문헌 (18)
- 구본관, "원리 중심의 문법 교육에 대한 연구", 국어교육연구, (27), pp.261~297 (2011), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 김미선, "듣기 평가 문항의 타당도 연구-‘KBS한국어능력시험’을 중심으로-", 어문론집, 59, pp.357~380 (2014), 중앙어문학회[DOI]
- 김영란, "과학과 언어(국어)의 통합적 교수·학습을 위한 ‘讀·討·論’ 모형화 연구: 학문 문식성 개념을 기초로 하여", 교육과정평가연구, 19(1), pp.149~178 (2016), 한국교육과정평가원
- 남가영, "문법교육용 텍스트의 개념 및 범주", 국어교육, (136), pp.139~173 (2011), 한국어교육학회
- 노명완, "문식성연구" (2002), 박이정
- 민동석, "교육 2030 인천선언과 실행계획", 유네스코한국위원회, ~ (2016)
- 민현식, "국어교육과 생애주기(평생)교육의 학제적 접근 - 평생국어교육의 문해력 증진을 위하여 -", 국어교육학연구, 50(1), pp.5~46 (2015), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- 박재현, "KBS한국어능력시험의 문항 특성", 국어생활, 19(3), pp.45~59 (2009), 국립국어원
- 양명희, "채용을 위한 국어 시험의 현황과 개선 방안", 국어교육학연구, (20), pp.167~196 (2004), 국어교육학회
- 양세희, "문법 문식성 평가로서의 공무원 임용 시험 문법 영역 분석 - 직업 문식성의 확장을 위하여 -", 한말연구, (57), pp.221~248 (2020), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 윤여각, "평생교육 개념의 재검토 : 유네스코의 랑그랑·포르·다베·들로 보고서를 중심으로", 평생교육학연구, 21(4), pp.31~53 (2015), 한국평생교육학회
- 윤정일, "인간 능력으로서의 역량에 대한 고찰 : 역량의 특성과 차원", 교육학연구, 45(3), pp.233~260 (2007), 한국교육학회
- 이관규, "문법 교육의 인식 변화와 문법 교재의 양상", 새국어교육, (89), pp.257~276 (2012), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 이지영, "평생학습사회와 문식성 교육의 방향", 국어교육, (171), pp.1~29 (2020), 한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 이효영, "학습생태계 구성 체제와 성인학습자 역량 간의 구조적 분석", 평생교육학연구, 24(2), pp.1~30 (2018), 한국평생교육학회[DOI]
- 조진수, "평생 교육의 관점에서 본 문법 교육", 새국어생활, 28(3), pp.65~85 (2018), 국립국어원
- Shanahan, C., "Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: rethinking content area literacy", Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), pp.40~59 (2008)
- Uzunboylu, H., "Lifelong Learning Competence Scale(LLLCS): The Study of Validity and Reliability, H. U", Journal of Education, 41(41), pp.449~460 (2012)