‘의미’라고 불리는 것들 사이의 상관관계 검토
On the interrelation between the things which are called as ‘meaning’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to define more clearly the correlation between the terms called as ‘meaning’, which are used in Korean linguistics. As for the meaning of a linguistic sign it is common sense that it refers to the signified for a signifier in Saussurean concept. These signifiers may be defined as concepts or as references. Defining the meaning of a linguistic sign as a concept is a problem in that it is difficult to define the meaning of a linguistic sign accurately and necessarily, and defining it as a reference has a problem in that it is difficult to understand in detail because it does not explain it concretely. We might have to pursue an appropriate conceptual paraphrase for a dictionary definition while understanding that reference is the essence of the signified. Regarding the meanings that linguistic signs and combinations of linguistic signs generate together, it is useful to accept the principle of compositionality. In doing this, it is necessary to fully understand that the truth condition is the meaning of the proposition. Also, the meaning of linguistic symbols cannot be interpreted accurately apart from the context. The used sentence, that is, the utterance, needs to be interpreted in consideration of the linguistic context and situational context, and this interpretation leads to the explicature(explicit meaning). And this can be a starting point to infer an implicature(implicit meaning). Based on the understanding of above mentioned meaning, this study attempted to reveal the semantic status of such terms for the semantic types classified into 7 types by Leech and 3 types by Cruse. Meaning is the content that is imperceptible but is actually conveyed by linguistic symbols. Therefore, understanding of meaning accurately is absolutely necessary for the study of linguistic signs.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to define more clearly the correlation between the terms called as ‘meaning’, which are used in Korean linguistics. As for the meaning of a linguistic sign it is common sense that it refers to the signified for a signifier in Saussurean concept. These signifiers may be defined as concepts or as references. Defining the meaning of a linguistic sign as a concept is a problem in that it is difficult to define the meaning of a linguistic sign accurately and necessarily, and defining it as a reference has a problem in that it is difficult to understand in detail because it does not explain it concretely. We might have to pursue an appropriate conceptual paraphrase for a dictionary definition while understanding that reference is the essence of the signified. Regarding the meanings that linguistic signs and combinations of linguistic signs generate together, it is useful to accept the principle of compositionality. In doing this, it is necessary to fully understand that the truth condition is the meaning of the proposition. Also, the meaning of linguistic symbols cannot be interpreted accurately apart from the context. The used sentence, that is, the utterance, needs to be interpreted in consideration of the linguistic context and situational context, and this interpretation leads to the explicature(explicit meaning). And this can be a starting point to infer an implicature(implicit meaning). Based on the understanding of above mentioned meaning, this study attempted to reveal the semantic status of such terms for the semantic types classified into 7 types by Leech and 3 types by Cruse. Meaning is the content that is imperceptible but is actually conveyed by linguistic symbols. Therefore, understanding of meaning accurately is absolutely necessary for the study of linguistic signs.
참고문헌 (28)
- 강범모, "의미론에서 "의미"와 관련된 용어들의 개념과 번역어", 언어와 정보, 15(1), pp.79~92 (2011), 한국언어정보학회
- 박재연, "한국어 문법 형식의 의미 기술을 위한 의미의 종류 설정에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 77, pp.103~150 (2022), 한국어의미학회
- 박철우, "어휘부와 의미론", 國語學, (66), pp.445~485 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박철우, "구문과 정보 -국어 문법에서의 정보구조의 위상 검토-", 國語學, (89), pp.337~383 (2019), 국어학회
- 박철우, "이름의 언어학" (2022), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- 박철우, "문장 의미의 분석 방법과 언어 교육적 함의", 한국어 의미학, 78, pp.173~200 (2022), 한국어의미학회
- 윤평현, "새로 펴낸 국어 의미론" (2020), 역락
- 이성범, "추론의 화용론" (2001), 한국문화사
- Altschuler, D, "A Course in Semantics" (2019), The MIT Press
- Cruse, A., "언어의 의미: 의미·화용론 개론" (2002), 태학사
- Dowty, D., "Compositionality as an Empirical Problem, draft", ~ (2006)
- Elbourne, P., "의미란 무엇인가 –의미론 지침서" (2020), 한국문화사
- Fillmore, C. J., "Universals in Linguistic Theory", pp.1~25 (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Frege, G., "Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, Band 100", pp.25~50 (1892)
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), Chicago University Press
- Goldberg, A. E., "Semantics Handbook", pp.419~430 (2016), Routledge
- Griffiths, P., "언어 의미학 개설" (2006), 한국문화사
- Grundy, P., "화용론의 실제" (2008), 커뮤니케이션북스
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2", Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), pp.199~244 (1967)
- Leech, G. N., "Semantics" (1974), Penguin Books
- Lyons, J., "Semantics Ⅰ" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Mill, J. S., "A System of Logic" (1943), Longman
- Ogden, C. K., "The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism" (1923), A Harvest Book, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc
- Pustejovsky, J., "Generative Lexicon" (1995), the MIT Press
- Riemer, N., "Introducing Semantics" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
- Tarski, A., "The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4 (1944)
- Wilson, D., "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.607~632 (2004), Blackwell