中国的技术侦查及其司法控制 - 以数字时代为背景 -
China’s Technical Investigation and Its Judicial Control - With the Background of the Digital Age -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
2012年《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》修订,将技术侦查措施纳入法 律规制,开启技术侦查法治化的重大历史进程. 数字时代,技术侦查与新 一代信息技术融合发展,技术手段与方法不断更新. 然而,刑事诉讼法及 配套规定中关于技术侦查的部分规定滞后于侦查实践,相关法律规定零 散而不成体系,存在实体条件上定义不明确、具体执行程序过于宽松等 问题. 为此,有必要以比例原则为指引,对技术侦查措施进行集中、统一 立法. 数字时代中国技术侦查的司法控制应从实体与程序两个角度切入, 在实体方面,厘清技术侦查的概念,明确技术侦查的实施主体及案件范 围;在程序方面,确立内部监督与外部监督机制相结合的技术侦查司法 控制模式,严格审查技术侦查适用的种类与期限,细化技术侦查证据的 使用原则与规则.
Abstract
Forther evision of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China in 2012, it incorporated technical investigation measures into legal regulation, which thus opened a major historical process of the legalization of technical investigation. With the integration development of technical investigation and the new generation of information technology in the digital age, it has promoted the constant up dating of the technical means and methods. However, the relevant legal provisions are scattered and unsystematic since some provisions on technical investigation in the criminal procedure law and supporting provisions lag behind the investigation practice, which exists some problems, such as unclear definition of substantive conditions, excessive loose specific implementation procedures and so on. As the result, the centralized and unified legislation on technical investigation measures under the guidance of the principle of proportionality should be carried out. In terms of the judicial control of China’s technical investigation in the digital age, it should start from two perspectives of entity and procedure, which should clarify the concept of technical investigation, and clarify the implementation subject and case scope of technical investigation in the aspect of entity. Then, it should establish the judicial control mode of technical investigation combining internal supervision and external supervision mechanism in the aspect of procedure, which should also strictly review the types and duration of technical investigation, as well as refine the use principles and rules of technical investigation evidence.
참고문헌 (14)
- 胡铭, "信息社会与刑事司法变革", 法治现代化研究, 1(03), pp.22~31 (2017)
- 富勒, "法律的道德性", pp.75~ (2005), 商务印书馆
- 陈光中, "<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法>修改条文释义与点评", pp.213~ (2012), 人民法院出版社
- 王晓伟, "技术侦查法治化研究", pp.169~ (2015), 中国人民公安大学出版社
- 程雷, "大数据侦查的法律控制", 中国社会科学, (11), pp.156~180 (2018)
- 胡铭, "大数据时代侦查权的扩张与规制", 法学论坛, 36(03), pp.5~14 (2021)
- 程雷, "大数据背景下的秘密监控与公民个人信息保护", 法学论坛, 36(03), pp.15~26 (2021)
- 刘梅湘, "侦查机关实施网络监控措施的程序法规制——以域外法的相关规定为参照", 法商研究, 34(01), pp.174~182 (2017)
- 刘鹏, "技术侦查疑难问题研究", 法学杂志, 38(07), pp.116~122 (2017)
- 王锡锌, "个人信息国家保护义务及展开", 中国法学, (01), pp.145~166 (2021)
- 裴炜, "比例原则视域下电子侦查取证程序性规则构建", 环球法律评论, 39(01), pp.80~95 (2017)
- 刘玫, "从冲突到融入:刑事侦查中公民个人信息保护的规则建构", 法治研究, (05), pp.34~45 (2021)
- 王东, "技术侦查的法律规制", 中国法学, (05), pp.273~283 (2014)
- 刘梅湘, "侦查机关实施网络监控措施的程序法规制——以域外法的相关规定为参照", 法商研究, 34(01), pp.174~182 (2017)
