본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Responsibility for Free Choice between Good and Evil: Matteo Ricci’s Debate with the Chinese Scholar

이종우
한국기독교사회윤리학회 (The Society Of Korean Christian Social Ethics)|2023.04|기독교사회윤리 (The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics)|제55호|pp. 289-312

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

책임Confucianism유교선악Good and EvilCatholicism토마스 아퀴나스Thomas Aquinas가톨릭천주the Lord of Heaven상벌Reward and Punishment
주제분류기독교신학

초록

Matteo Ricci claimed the Lord of Heaven’s having bestowed humans a free choice between good and evil, and the responsibility for the free choice means the Lord of Heaven’s reward and punishment: sending good souls to heaven or evil souls to hell. The choice means based on human free will and it was influenced by Thomas Aquinas. Ricci claimed that good souls will live in Heaven after their death, whereas evil souls will live in Hell forever after their death. Ricci regarded it as supplement to Confucianism. Because Ricci considered the Lord of Heaven in Catholicism and Shangdi in Confucian classic books as the same. However, this was not mentioned heaven and hell in Confucian classics. Unlike the claim of Ricci, the Chinese scholar believed that good and evil actions are regardless of human will, and good emerges from original human mind. Thus, humans should have good mind. He argued that humans have also taken the responsibility for their good and evil actions in this life, not taking responsibility after their death. This is different from the claim of Ricci.

Abstract

Matteo Ricci claimed the Lord of Heaven’s having bestowed humans a free choice between good and evil, and the responsibility for the free choice means the Lord of Heaven’s reward and punishment: sending good souls to heaven or evil souls to hell. The choice means based on human free will and it was influenced by Thomas Aquinas. Ricci claimed that good souls will live in Heaven after their death, whereas evil souls will live in Hell forever after their death. Ricci regarded it as supplement to Confucianism. Because Ricci considered the Lord of Heaven in Catholicism and Shangdi in Confucian classic books as the same. However, this was not mentioned heaven and hell in Confucian classics. Unlike the claim of Ricci, the Chinese scholar believed that good and evil actions are regardless of human will, and good emerges from original human mind. Thus, humans should have good mind. He argued that humans have also taken the responsibility for their good and evil actions in this life, not taking responsibility after their death. This is different from the claim of Ricci.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 에 나타나 16세기 후반 예수회 대학의 교과과정과 예수회 토미즘(Jesuit Thomism)의 영향, "한국기독교신학논총", 2005, 291~312, pp.한국기독교학회
  2. 김선희(Kim Seonhee), "마테오 리치와 주희, 그리고 정약용: 천주실의 와 동아시아 유학의 지평 . (Matteo Ricci, Zhu Xi and Jeong Yakyong: Tianzhu shiyi and The Horizon of East Confucianism)" (2012), 심산출판사(Simsan chulpansa)
  3. "大明律 (Daiming lu)" (1999), 法律出版社(Falu chbanshe)
  4. Ricci, Matteo, "天主實義(Tianzhu shiyi, The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven)" (1923), 上海土山灣印書館
  5. Ricci, Matteo, "The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven" (1985), The Institute of Jesuit Sources, in cooperation with The Ricci Institute Taipei
  6. "論語 . (Lunyu.)" (1970), Daedong munhwa yeonkuwon at Sungkyunkwan University
  7. "孟子 . (Mengzi.)" (1970), Daedong munhwa yeonkuwon at Sungkyunkwan University
  8. 백민정(Baek Minjeong), "정약용의 철학: 주희와 마테오 리치를 넘어 새로운 체계로 . (The Philosophy of Jeong Yakyong: A New Structure beyond Zhu Xi and Matteo Ricci)" (2022), 이학사(Ihagsa)
  9. 백민정, "茶山 心性論에서 도덕감정과 자유의지에 관한 문제", 한국실학연구, (14), pp.401~446 (2007), 한국실학학회
  10. "書經 . (Shujing, The Classic of Document.)" (1984), Daedong munhwa yeon-kuwon at Sungkyunkwan University
  11. 송영배, "天主實義 . (Tianzhu shiyi.)" (2016), Seoul National University Press
  12. 宋荣培(Song Youngbae), "利玛窦的《天主实义》与儒学的融合和困境 (Matteo Ricci’s Tianzhu shiyi and Harmony and Dilema with Confucianism)", 世界宗教研究(Journal of the World Religion), pp.80~90 (1999)
  13. 신창석(Sin Changseok), "신학대전의 형성과 구조(Formation and Structure of Summa Theologica)", 現代가톨릭思想(Journal of Modern Catholic Ideas), 9, pp.3~40 (1993)
  14. 양명수(Yang Myungsu), "천주실의 의 천주와 성리학의 리의 차이 : 아퀴나스의 목적인과 능동인의 관계를 중심으로(Christian God in The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven(T’ien-chu Shih-i)and Neo-ConfucianLi(理)in the Light of the Final Cause and the Efficient cause of Aquinas)", 철학사상(Journal of Phiosophical Ideas), 31, pp.215~248 (2009)
  15. 유지황(Lew Jiwhang), "인식과 자유선택 : 토마스 아퀴나스의 이성과 의지 관계 이해(Knowledge and Free Choice : St. Thomas Aquinas on the Relation of Reason and Will)", 한국기독교교회사(Joumal of The Church History Society in Korea), 17, pp.135~165 (2005)
  16. Ryoske, Inakaki, "토마스 아퀴나스 신학대전 새로 알기(A New Understanding of Summa Theologica of Thomas Aquinas)" (2010), Catholic Press
  17. 정현수(Jung Hyunsoo), "마테오 리치의 천학과 성리학의 인성론 연구: 천주실의 를 중심으로.” (A Study on the Science of Heaven of Matteo Ricci’s and Human Nature of Neo-Confucianism: Focusing on Tianzhu shiyi)", 유교사 상문화연구 (The Study of Confucianism), 54, pp.415~445 (2013)
  18. 정현수(Jung Hyunsoo), "天主實義 나타난 天主學과 性理學의 善惡觀 比較硏究(A Comparative Study on the View of Good and Evil Between Catholicism and Neo-Confucianism Shown in De Deo Verax Disputatio)", 동양철학(Journal of Asian Philosophy in Korea), 42, pp.369~399 (2014)
  19. 정현수(Jung Hyunsoo), "마테오 리치의 천학과 성리학의 수양론 연구(A Study on the Science of Heaven of Matteo Ricci’s and the self-cultivation of Neo-Confucianism: Centering on De Deo Verax Disputatio)", 유교사상 문화연구(The Study of Confucianism), 56, pp.157~190 (2014)
  20. 朱熹(Zhu Xi), "朱子語類 (Zhuzi yulei)" (1999), 中華書局(Zhonghua shuju)
  21. "Johann Adamswhall von Bell(汤若望). Zhuzhiqunzheng(主制群征)"[URL]
  22. Aristotle, "The Nicomachean Ethics" (2017), Amazon Kindle Edition
  23. Augustine, "City Of God, in The Complete Works of St. Augustine" (2019), Amazon Kindle Edition
  24. Baker, Don, "Thomas Aquinas and Chong Yagyong : Rebels Within Tradition", 다산학(Journal of Tasan Studies), 3, pp.32~69 (2002)
  25. Gilson, Etienne, "the Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas" (1993), Barnes & Noble Books
  26. Slingerland, Edward, "Lunyu(論語)" (2003), Hackett Publishing, Amazon Kindle Edition
  27. Ricci, Matteo, "China in The Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Mattew Ricci: 1583-1610" (1953), Randomhouse
  28. Aquinas, Thomas, "Summa Theologica. in The Complete Works of Thomas Aquinas" (2018), Amazon Kindle Edition
  29. 이종우, "Matteo Ricci's Debate with A Confucian on Whether A Child's Theft to Support His Parents Is Good or Evil", 倫理硏究, 1(131), pp.259~278 (2020), 한국윤리학회[DOI]
  30. 이종우, "Is Good Act Rooted in Good Will? -Matteo Ricci’s Debate with the Chinese Scholar", 기독교사회윤리, (53), pp.411~433 (2022), 한국기독교사회윤리학회

관련 논문AI추천

Is Good Act Rooted in Good Will? -Matteo Ricci’s Debate with the Chinese Scholar이종우한국기독교사회윤리학회 · 기독교사회윤리2022 · 제53호Matteo Ricci's Debate with A Confucian on Whether A Child's Theft to Support His Parents Is Good or Evil이종우한국윤리학회 · 倫理硏究2020 · 제1권 제131호Do Humans and Animals Innately Possess Morality, and Are Animals Capable of Moral Actions Like Humans?- A Comparison of Matteo Ricci and Zhu Xi이종우한국기독교사회윤리학회 · 기독교사회윤리2024 · 제59호An Unforseen Mission: Matteo Ricci and Koreakevin cawley남도문화연구소 · 남도문화연구2014 · 제27호Introduction and Re-writing of Aristotle’s De Anima by Early Jesuits in ChinaVincent Shen철학연구소 · 철학논집2009 · 제17권 The Radical Hermeneutics of Matteo Ricci트란 반 도안서강대학교 신학연구소 · 신학과철학2013 · 제22호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

포스트 코로나 시대의 기독교 생태윤리-Imago Dei 와 One Health 개념을 중심으로Kim Seong Hopp. 9-36린지의 동물신학 탐구와 비평적 대화 모색-몰트만, 마우, 스택하우스를 중심으로이창호pp. 37-75미카엘 벨커의 창조윤리홍순원pp. 77-103포스트휴먼 시대, 사이보그-되기의 기독교윤리적 응답-임마누엘 레비나스와 미로슬라브 볼프를 중심으로홍창현pp. 105-131아우구스티누스와‘사회적 사랑(amor socialis)’의 사회적 영성-제자윤리의 관점에문시영pp. 135-167
원문 보기