본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대몽골어와 한국어의 재귀대명사 대조 연구

A contrastive study about the reflexive pronoun of Modern Mongolian and Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this study I summarized the morphology, composition, its meaning and the function of modern Mongolian reflexive pronoun and did contrastive analysis of having relevance to between Korean reflexive pronoun and Mongolian one based on the study of this. Basically modern Mongolian reflexive pronoun has the functions of an agent to express one’s own self in a context and it can refer to a first person pronoun, a second person pronoun, a third person pronoun and everybody else. Similarly Korean one has the same function to refer to any subject or agent in a context as Mongolian one. So this can be the similarity of Korean and Mongolian reflexive pronoun usage. However Korean has the different reflexive pronoun usage. For example, Korean can be spoken differently depending on the status like age, social position between speaker and listener. That is, the speaker must use correct usage of a personal pronoun and a reflexive pronoun after sorting out ‘haching(non honorific, kind of command)’, ‘pyeongching (between ordinary, fair relation)’ ‘jonching (honorific, respect)’, ‘geukjonching(very exalted)’ depending on who the listener is. But Mongolian reflexive pronoun has the different usage unlike Korean one. Not only Modern Mongolian but also reflexive pronoun has few clear distinctions except ‘та(ta)’, which means honorific title in a second person pronoun. Because a special Korean reflexive pronoun the same as Mongolian has not only common meaning but also different, various meaning depending on the surrounding situation, the context, the speaker has to select a well chosen word as the correspondence of the listener using the world in the sentence , in the context or in a speaking situation. That is, Mongolian reflexive pronoun, ‘өөр(өөрөө) /singular/’ can be widely used for expressing both the function and the meaning of many Korean reflexive pronouns. So proper Korean reflexive pronoun has to be used depending on the morphology, structure, context and speaking situation. Modern Mongolian reflexive pronoun and Korean one establish a relation with not a one-to-one correspondence relation but several-for-one correspondence relation.

Abstract

In this study I summarized the morphology, composition, its meaning and the function of modern Mongolian reflexive pronoun and did contrastive analysis of having relevance to between Korean reflexive pronoun and Mongolian one based on the study of this. Basically modern Mongolian reflexive pronoun has the functions of an agent to express one’s own self in a context and it can refer to a first person pronoun, a second person pronoun, a third person pronoun and everybody else. Similarly Korean one has the same function to refer to any subject or agent in a context as Mongolian one. So this can be the similarity of Korean and Mongolian reflexive pronoun usage. However Korean has the different reflexive pronoun usage. For example, Korean can be spoken differently depending on the status like age, social position between speaker and listener. That is, the speaker must use correct usage of a personal pronoun and a reflexive pronoun after sorting out ‘haching(non honorific, kind of command)’, ‘pyeongching (between ordinary, fair relation)’ ‘jonching (honorific, respect)’, ‘geukjonching(very exalted)’ depending on who the listener is. But Mongolian reflexive pronoun has the different usage unlike Korean one. Not only Modern Mongolian but also reflexive pronoun has few clear distinctions except ‘та(ta)’, which means honorific title in a second person pronoun. Because a special Korean reflexive pronoun the same as Mongolian has not only common meaning but also different, various meaning depending on the surrounding situation, the context, the speaker has to select a well chosen word as the correspondence of the listener using the world in the sentence , in the context or in a speaking situation. That is, Mongolian reflexive pronoun, ‘өөр(өөрөө) /singular/’ can be widely used for expressing both the function and the meaning of many Korean reflexive pronouns. So proper Korean reflexive pronoun has to be used depending on the morphology, structure, context and speaking situation. Modern Mongolian reflexive pronoun and Korean one establish a relation with not a one-to-one correspondence relation but several-for-one correspondence relation.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김기성, "현대 몽골어와 한국어의 내포문 대조 연구 -명사절, 관형사절 내포문을 중심으로-", 몽골학, (22), pp.99~122 (2007), 한국몽골학회
  2. 김기성, "현대몽골어와 한국어의 인칭대명사 대조 연구", 몽골학, (40), pp.47~79 (2015), 한국몽골학회
  3. 김미형, "한국어 대명사" (1995), 한신문화사
  4. 김승곤, "현대표준말본" (2003), 한국문화사
  5. 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
  6. 백문영, "한국어·중국어 재귀 표현 대조 연구 및 교육 방안 : 한국어 '자기', '자신', 중국어 '自己'를 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학과 한국어교육전공, pp.2014
  7. 왕문용, "국어 문법론의 이해" (1993), 개문사
  8. 우인혜, "몽골인을 위한 쉬운 한국어 문법" (2005), 한국문화사
  9. 우형식, "학습 활동을 겸한 한국어 문법론" (2003), 부산외국어대학교출판부
  10. 유단청, "한국어와 중국어의 재귀 대명사 대조 연구 : 한국어 '자기', '자신'과 중국어 '自己'를 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육학, pp.2011
  11. 이관규, "국어 교육을 위한 국어 문법론" (2005), 집문당
  12. 이익섭, "한국어 문법" (2005), 서울대학교출판부
  13. 임홍빈, "국어의 재귀사 연구" (1987), 신구문화사
  14. 한송화, "재귀대명사 ‘자기’의 의미와 기능 연구 - ‘자기’와 ‘자신’의 말뭉치 용례를 중심으로 -", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 38, pp.279~303 (2013), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  15. Ж.Төмөрцэрэн, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэл зүй" (1966), Улсын хэвлэлийн хэрэг эрхлэх хороо
  16. Тэргүүн дэвтэр, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний үгзүйн байгуулал", pp.1987, Л. Балдан
  17. П. Бямбасан, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний үгийн бүтэц, нэр үгсийн аймаг, БНМАУ Ардын боловсролын яамны хэвлэл" (1975), Улаанбаатар
  18. Ц.Жанчивдорж, "Монгол хэлний үг зүй -VI ангид үзнэ" (1967), БНМАУ Гэгээрлийн яамны хэвлэл
  19. Ц.Өнөрбаян, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэл" (2012), Улаанбаатар хот
  20. Ю.Мөнх-Амгалан, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний бүтээвэр судлал II", pp.290~291 (2014), Улаанбаатар
  21. Jugderiin Lubsangdorji, "Colloquial Mongolian" (2004), Nakladatelstvi TRITON
  22. Rita Kullmann, "Mongolian Grammar" (1996), Jensco Ltd.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)