본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

철골 모멘트골조로 보강된 철근콘크리트 건물의 내진성능평가

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Non-Seismic Reinforced Concrete Buildings Strengthened by Perimeter Steel Moment Frame

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류토목공학

초록

This paper is to investigate the retrofitting effect for a non-seismic reinforced concrete frame strengthened by perimeter steel moment frames with indirect integrity, which ameliorates the problems of the direct integrity method. To achieve this, first, full-scale tests were conducted to address the structural behavior of a two-story non-seismic reinforced concrete frame and a strengthened frame. The non-seismic frame showed a maximum strength of 185 kN because the flexural-shear failure at the bottom end of columns on the first floor was governed, and shear cracks were concentrated at the beam-column joints on the second floor. The strengthened frame possessed a maximum strength of 338 kN, which is more than 1.8 times that of the non-seismic specimen. A considerable decrease in the quantity of cracks for the strengthened frame was observed compared with the non-seismic frame, while there was the obvious appearance of the failure pattern due to the shear crack. The lateral-resisting capacity for the non-seismic bare frame and the strengthened frame may be determined per the specified shear strength of the reinforced columns in accordance with the distance to a critical section. The effective depth of the column may be referred to as the longitudinal length from the border between the column and the foundation. The lateral-resisting capacity for the non-seismic bare frame and the strengthened frame may be reasonably determined per the specified shear strength of the reinforced columns in accordance with the distance to a critical section. The effective depth of the column may be referred to as the longitudinal length from the border between the column and the foundation. The proposed method had an error of about 2.2% for the non-seismic details and about 4.4% for the strengthened frame based on the closed results versus the experimental results.

Abstract

This paper is to investigate the retrofitting effect for a non-seismic reinforced concrete frame strengthened by perimeter steel moment frames with indirect integrity, which ameliorates the problems of the direct integrity method. To achieve this, first, full-scale tests were conducted to address the structural behavior of a two-story non-seismic reinforced concrete frame and a strengthened frame. The non-seismic frame showed a maximum strength of 185 kN because the flexural-shear failure at the bottom end of columns on the first floor was governed, and shear cracks were concentrated at the beam-column joints on the second floor. The strengthened frame possessed a maximum strength of 338 kN, which is more than 1.8 times that of the non-seismic specimen. A considerable decrease in the quantity of cracks for the strengthened frame was observed compared with the non-seismic frame, while there was the obvious appearance of the failure pattern due to the shear crack. The lateral-resisting capacity for the non-seismic bare frame and the strengthened frame may be determined per the specified shear strength of the reinforced columns in accordance with the distance to a critical section. The effective depth of the column may be referred to as the longitudinal length from the border between the column and the foundation. The lateral-resisting capacity for the non-seismic bare frame and the strengthened frame may be reasonably determined per the specified shear strength of the reinforced columns in accordance with the distance to a critical section. The effective depth of the column may be referred to as the longitudinal length from the border between the column and the foundation. The proposed method had an error of about 2.2% for the non-seismic details and about 4.4% for the strengthened frame based on the closed results versus the experimental results.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Earthquake Annual Report, "Korea Meteorological Administration", Korea Meteorological Administration, ~ (2017)
  2. 2017 Pohang earthquake whitepaper, "Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety", Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety, ~ (2018)
  3. Neria Y, "Post-traumatic stress disorder following disasters : A systematic review", Psychological Medicine, 38, pp.467~480 (2008)
  4. 권하린, "경북지역 지진 생존자들의 외상후 스트레스 및 우울 증상에 대한 심리적 예측 요인", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(2), pp.127~144 (2019), 한국임상심리학회
  5. Establishment of master plan for Korean seismic design and retrofit, "Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety", Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety, ~ (2018)
  6. 이복기, "유사동적실험에 의한 HSWF 외부접합공법으로 내진보강 된 실물 2층 철근콘크리트 골조의 내진성능 평가", 콘크리트학회 논문집, 31(1), pp.89~97 (2019), 한국콘크리트학회[DOI]
  7. 정희창, "반복가력실험 및 비선형해석에 의한 내부접합형 철골프레임 내진보강공법의 내진성능", 콘크리트학회 논문집, 31(1), pp.79~88 (2019), 한국콘크리트학회[DOI]
  8. 김선웅, "내부 매입형 철골조로 보강된 철근콘크리트 건물의 내진성능평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 24(1), pp.29~37 (2020), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
  9. Korea Ministry of Education, "Seismic design code of school facilities", Korea Ministry of Education, ~ (2020)
  10. Korea Ministry of Education, "Manual o f seismic perf ormance evaluation and retrofit f or school f acilities", Korea Ministry of Education, ~ (2019)
  11. Korea Ministry of Education and Korea Institute of Educational Environment, "Guideline for seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of existing school buildings in Korea", Korea Ministry of Education and Korea Institute of Educational Environment, 108~ (2011)
  12. "Union Corporation"[URL]
  13. HILTI Corporation, "Operating instruction Hilti HIT-CT 1 with HITV", HILTI Corporation, ~ (2012)
  14. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS), "Method of tensile test for metallick materials - KS B 0802", KATS, ~ (2003)
  15. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS), "Standard test method for making and curing concrete specimens - KS F 2403", ~ (2014)
  16. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS), "Standard test for compressive strength of concrete - KS F 2405. KATS", ~ (2010)
  17. "ACI Committee 374. 374.1-05: Acceptance criteria f or moment f rames based on structural testing and commentary", American Concrete Institute (ACI), ~ (2006)
  18. "ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structure concrete (ACI 318-14)", American Concrete Institute (ACI), ~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)