게세르와 말(馬) -<게세르 칸<에 나타난 말 형상을 중심으로-
Geser and Horses focused on the figures of the horse described in the “Geser”
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims at contemplating the semantic network of horses in Mongolian nomadic culture through the configuration of horses described in Beijing edition Geser. Geser is a heroic narrative story which arose from 10th century Tibet and became spread throughout the East Asia. Depending on the regional variation, the story is interpreted as a myth, or understood as a historically reflected heroic epic or as a pure literary piece. Thus, it is an important source to clarify the East Asian world-view. A horse in Mongolian nomadic culture has a meaning of something more than a domestic animal. No nomadic culture can be founded without horses. It is because horses make cattle pastures in wide meadow and long-distance plundering wars possible. In Geser, horses are described as transportations both in daily lives and in wars, as spoils of wars, as objects of sacrifice, and as forecasting methods, and such descriptions represent the nomadic culture. The configuration of ‘Bilig-ün keger morin’ clearly shows the status of horses in the nomadic culture. Bilig-ün keger morin, that is a sacred horse, is described not as a mere horse but as an assistant and companion of Geser Khan. It can be said that the heroic epic of Geser Khan cannot be formed without Bilig-ün keger morin. It represents the fact that nothing can be done without horses in nomadic cultural region. Horses appearing in Geser are described as domestic animals, as helpers, and as beings with divinity. Such configurations of horses show the characters and the status of horses in the nomadic culture. In other words, it confirms that the strongest key-word to understand the nomadic culture is a horse.
Abstract
This paper aims at contemplating the semantic network of horses in Mongolian nomadic culture through the configuration of horses described in Beijing edition Geser. Geser is a heroic narrative story which arose from 10th century Tibet and became spread throughout the East Asia. Depending on the regional variation, the story is interpreted as a myth, or understood as a historically reflected heroic epic or as a pure literary piece. Thus, it is an important source to clarify the East Asian world-view. A horse in Mongolian nomadic culture has a meaning of something more than a domestic animal. No nomadic culture can be founded without horses. It is because horses make cattle pastures in wide meadow and long-distance plundering wars possible. In Geser, horses are described as transportations both in daily lives and in wars, as spoils of wars, as objects of sacrifice, and as forecasting methods, and such descriptions represent the nomadic culture. The configuration of ‘Bilig-ün keger morin’ clearly shows the status of horses in the nomadic culture. Bilig-ün keger morin, that is a sacred horse, is described not as a mere horse but as an assistant and companion of Geser Khan. It can be said that the heroic epic of Geser Khan cannot be formed without Bilig-ün keger morin. It represents the fact that nothing can be done without horses in nomadic cultural region. Horses appearing in Geser are described as domestic animals, as helpers, and as beings with divinity. Such configurations of horses show the characters and the status of horses in the nomadic culture. In other words, it confirms that the strongest key-word to understand the nomadic culture is a horse.
참고문헌 (20)
- 유원수, "게세르 칸" (2007), 사계절
- 일리야 N. 마다손, "바이칼의 게세르 신화" (2008), 솔
- 곽철환, "시공 불교사전" (2003), 시공사
- 박환영, "몽골 유목문화 연구" (2010), 역락 출판사
- 발터 하이시이, "몽골의 종교" (2003), 소나무
- 김재인, "천 개의 고원." (2001), 새물결출판사
- 김용범, "영웅서사시 <게세르 칸>의 내러티브 연구 ― 글로벌 문화콘텐츠 창작소재로서의 활용성을 중심으로", 한국언어문화, (40), pp.51~81 (2009), 한국언어문화학회
- 김기선, "한국어와 몽골어에 나타난 말(馬)", 몽골학, (17), pp.71~92 (2004), 한국몽골학회
- 남도영, "韓國馬政史" (1996), 한국마사회 마사박물관
- 제주마문화연구보고서·Ⅰ 제주도 제주마, "제주도 문화예술과", ~ (2002)
- 이 지니는 의미와 상징, "한국어문학 국제 학술포럼 제7차 국제학술대회", 2009, ~
- 일리야 N. 마다손, "바이칼의 게세르 신화" (2008), 솔
- 양민종, "부리야트 <게세르> 서사시 판본 비교연구", 비교민속학, (34), pp.381~415 (2007), 비교민속학회
- 윤은숙, "한ㆍ몽 말 문화 연구 試論-한국과 몽골의 말과 관련된 세시풍속을 중심으로-", 한국초지조사료학회지, 24(4), pp.347~358 (2004), 한국초지조사료학회
- 이성규, "북경본 게세르(geser)의 몽골어 연구", 몽골학, (25), pp.71~128 (2008), 한국몽골학회
- 이성규, "몽골 게세르(Geser) 이야기의 판본과 간행", 몽골학, (30), pp.168~190 (2011), 한국몽골학회
- 정형호, "몽골·한국의 말(馬) 문화 비교 고찰", 중앙민속학, (8) (1996)
- 직지마, "몽·한 괴물퇴치설화의 대비 연구", 석사, pp.2011
- 최원오, "동북아신화에서의 ‘惡, 또는 부정적 존재들’에 대한 비교신화학적 이해 - 부리야트 <게세르> 신화를 중심으로 -", 한국문학논총, (54), pp.45~77 (2010), 한국문학회
- 표인주, "민속현상에 나타난 ‘말(馬)’의 상징성", 비교민속학, 9 (1992)
