고진동수 지진에 대한 기기 정착부의 비탄성 거동을 고려한 지진취약도 평가
Seismic Fragility Analysis Considering the Inelastic Behavior of Equipment Anchorages for High-Frequency Earthquakes
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nuclear power plants in Korea were designed and evaluated based on the NRC's Regulatory Guide 1.60, a design response spectrum for nuclear power plants. However, it can be seen that the seismic motion characteristics are different when analyzing the Gyeongju earthquake and the Pohang earthquake that has recently occurred in Korea. Compared to the design response spectrum, seismic motion characteristics in Korea have a larger spectral acceleration in the high-frequency region. Therefore, in the case of equipment with a high natural frequency installed in a nuclear power plant, seismic performance may be reduced by reflecting the characteristics of domestic seismic motions. The failure modes of the equipment are typically structural failure and functional failure, with an anchorage failure being a representative type of structural failure. In this study, comparative analyses were performed to decide whether to consider the inelastic behavior of the anchorage or not. As a result, it was confirmed that the seismic performance of the anchorages could be increased by considering the inelastic behavior of an anchorage.
Abstract
Nuclear power plants in Korea were designed and evaluated based on the NRC's Regulatory Guide 1.60, a design response spectrum for nuclear power plants. However, it can be seen that the seismic motion characteristics are different when analyzing the Gyeongju earthquake and the Pohang earthquake that has recently occurred in Korea. Compared to the design response spectrum, seismic motion characteristics in Korea have a larger spectral acceleration in the high-frequency region. Therefore, in the case of equipment with a high natural frequency installed in a nuclear power plant, seismic performance may be reduced by reflecting the characteristics of domestic seismic motions. The failure modes of the equipment are typically structural failure and functional failure, with an anchorage failure being a representative type of structural failure. In this study, comparative analyses were performed to decide whether to consider the inelastic behavior of the anchorage or not. As a result, it was confirmed that the seismic performance of the anchorages could be increased by considering the inelastic behavior of an anchorage.
참고문헌 (8)
- 임승현, "Opendata 기반 포항 및 경주지진에 의한 건물손상 평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 22(3), pp.121~128 (2018), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
- Korea Meteorological Administration, "Earthquake Notification –2016. 9.12 20:37", Official Notice, ~ (2016)
- Central Disaster Safety Measures Headquarters, "Press Releases:Recovery cost of Pohang Earthquake", ~ (2017)
- 임승현, "구조물 및 기기의 한계성능 평가를 위한 고진동수 지진특성을 반영한 응답스펙트럼 형상", 한국지진공학회논문집, 24(1), pp.1~8 (2020), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
- 임승현, "포항지진에 대한 원자력발전소 구조물 및 기기의 지진응답분석", 한국지진공학회논문집, 22(3), pp.113~119 (2018), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Regulatory Guide 1.60: Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants", ~ (2014)
- High Frequency Seismic Inelastic Effects on Equipment Anchorage, "Kassawara B", EPRI, ~, pp.EPRI 3002010665 (2017)
- Methodology for Developing Seismic Fragilities, "Reed JW", EPRI, ~, pp.EPRI TR-103959 (1994)