국내 지진동 특성에 대한 기기 용접 정착부의 비탄성에너지 흡수계수를 고려한 지진취약도 평가
Seismic Fragility Analysis of Equipment Considering the Inelastic Energy Absorption Factor of Weld Anchorage for Seismic Characteristics in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, most nuclear power plants were designed based on the design response spectrum of Regulatory Guide 1.60 of the NRC. However, in the case of earthquakes occurring in the country, the characteristics of seismic motions in Korea and the design response spectrum differed. The seismic motion in Korea had a higher spectral acceleration in the high-frequency range compared to the design response spectrum. The seismic capacity may be reduced when evaluating the seismic performance of the equipment with high-frequency earthquakes compared with what is evaluated by the design response spectrum for the equipment with a high natural frequency. Therefore, EPRI proposed the inelastic energy absorption factor for the equipment anchorage. In this study, the seismic performance of welding anchorage was evaluated by considering domestic seismic characteristics and EPRI's inelastic energy absorption factor. In order to reflect the characteristics of domestic earthquakes, the uniform hazard response spectrum (UHRS) of Uljin was used. Moreover, the seismic performance of the equipment was evaluated with a design response spectrum of R.G.1.60 and a uniform hazard response spectrum (UHRS) as seismic inputs. As a result, it was confirmed that the seismic performance of the weld anchorage could be increased when the inelastic energy absorption factor is used. Also, a comparative analysis was performed on the seismic capacity of the anchorage of equipment by the welding and the extended bolt.
Abstract
In Korea, most nuclear power plants were designed based on the design response spectrum of Regulatory Guide 1.60 of the NRC. However, in the case of earthquakes occurring in the country, the characteristics of seismic motions in Korea and the design response spectrum differed. The seismic motion in Korea had a higher spectral acceleration in the high-frequency range compared to the design response spectrum. The seismic capacity may be reduced when evaluating the seismic performance of the equipment with high-frequency earthquakes compared with what is evaluated by the design response spectrum for the equipment with a high natural frequency. Therefore, EPRI proposed the inelastic energy absorption factor for the equipment anchorage. In this study, the seismic performance of welding anchorage was evaluated by considering domestic seismic characteristics and EPRI's inelastic energy absorption factor. In order to reflect the characteristics of domestic earthquakes, the uniform hazard response spectrum (UHRS) of Uljin was used. Moreover, the seismic performance of the equipment was evaluated with a design response spectrum of R.G.1.60 and a uniform hazard response spectrum (UHRS) as seismic inputs. As a result, it was confirmed that the seismic performance of the weld anchorage could be increased when the inelastic energy absorption factor is used. Also, a comparative analysis was performed on the seismic capacity of the anchorage of equipment by the welding and the extended bolt.
참고문헌 (18)
- 임승현, "구조물 및 기기의 한계성능 평가를 위한 고진동수 지진특성을 반영한 응답스펙트럼 형상", 한국지진공학회논문집, 24(1), pp.1~8 (2020), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
- 임승현, "Opendata 기반 포항 및 경주지진에 의한 건물손상 평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 22(3), pp.121~128 (2018), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
- "Korea Meteorological AdministrationEarthquake Notification -2016. 9.12 20:37", Official notice, ~ (2016)
- "Central Disaster Safety Measures HeadquartersPress Releases:Recovery cost of Pohang earthquake", ~ (2017)
- "Ministry of the Interior and Safety2017 Statistical Yearbook of Natural Disaster", ~ (2018)
- "Ministry of the Interior and Safety2020 Statistical Yearbook of Natural Disaster", ~ (2021)
- 정영수, "Seismic performance of emergency diesel generator for high frequency motions", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 51(5), pp.1470~1476 (2019), 한국원자력학회[DOI]
- "US Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRegulatory Guide 1.60: Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants", ~ (2014)
- 박효상, "고주파 지진이 원자력 발전소 설비의 동적거동에 미치는 영향", 한국방재학회논문집, 17(6), pp.285~294 (2017), 한국방재학회[DOI]
- Kassawara B, "High Frequency Seismic Inelastic Effects on Equipment Anchorage", EPRI 3002010665, ~ (2017)
- 임승현, "고진동수 지진에 대한 기기 정착부의 비탄성 거동을 고려한 지진취약도 평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 25(6), pp.261~266 (2021), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
- 이철호, "RBS 약축 용접모멘트접합부의 내진성능 평가", 한국강구조학회 논문집, 27(6), pp.513~523 (2015), 한국강구조학회
- 박정웅, "선체구조물의 용접부 파괴 특성", 대한용접접합학회지, 25(4), pp.15~19 (2007), 대한용접접합학회
- Yunchan J, "Failure behaviors depending on the notch location of the impact test specimens on the HAZ", The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp.808~813 (2007)
- Myers AT, "Effect of weld details on the ductility of steel column baseplate connections", Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(6), pp.1366~1373 (2009)
- Lesik DF, "Ultimate strength of eccentrically loaded fillet welded connections", ~ (1988)
- 김민규, "평가용 스펙트럼이 구조물의 지진리스크에 미치는 영향", 한국지진공학회논문집, 13(6), pp.39~46 (2009), 한국지진공학회
- Methodology for Developing Seismic Fragilities, "Reed JW", EPRI, ~, pp.EPRI TR-103959 (1994)