유한요소 해석을 활용한 매설 배관의 지진 취약도 곡선 도출 기법 비교
Comparative Study on Seismic Fragility Curve Derivation Methods of Buried Pipeline Using Finite Element Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Seismic fragility curves play a crucial role in assessing potential seismic losses and predicting structural damage caused by earthquakes. This study compares non-sampling-based methods of seismic fragility curve derivation, particularly the probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM) and finite element reliability analysis (FERA), both of which require employing sophisticated finite element analysis to evaluate and predict structural damage caused by earthquakes. In this study, a three-dimensional finite element model of API 5L X65, a buried gas pipeline widely used in Korea, is constructed to derive seismic fragility curves. Its seismic vulnerability is assessed using nonlinear time-history analysis. PSDM and a FERA are employed to derive seismic fragility curves for comparison purposes, and the results are verified through a comparison with those from the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). It is observed that the fragility curves obtained from PSDM are relatively conservative, which is attributed to the assumption introduced to consider the uncertainty factors. In addition, this study provides a comprehensive comparison of seismic fragility curve derivation methods based on sophisticated finite element analysis, which may contribute to developing more accurate and efficient seismic fragility analysis.
Abstract
Seismic fragility curves play a crucial role in assessing potential seismic losses and predicting structural damage caused by earthquakes. This study compares non-sampling-based methods of seismic fragility curve derivation, particularly the probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM) and finite element reliability analysis (FERA), both of which require employing sophisticated finite element analysis to evaluate and predict structural damage caused by earthquakes. In this study, a three-dimensional finite element model of API 5L X65, a buried gas pipeline widely used in Korea, is constructed to derive seismic fragility curves. Its seismic vulnerability is assessed using nonlinear time-history analysis. PSDM and a FERA are employed to derive seismic fragility curves for comparison purposes, and the results are verified through a comparison with those from the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). It is observed that the fragility curves obtained from PSDM are relatively conservative, which is attributed to the assumption introduced to consider the uncertainty factors. In addition, this study provides a comprehensive comparison of seismic fragility curve derivation methods based on sophisticated finite element analysis, which may contribute to developing more accurate and efficient seismic fragility analysis.
참고문헌 (22)
- Yoon SS, "A comprehensive framework for seismic risk assessment of urban water transmission networks", Int J Disat Risk Re, 31, pp.983~994 (2018)
- "Hazus®–MH 2.1, Technical manual"[URL]
- Pitilakis K, "SYNER-G: systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities: methodology and applications" (2014), Springer
- Zentner I, "Fragility analysis methods : Review of existing approaches and application", Nucl Eng Des, 323, pp.245~258 (2017)
- Kwon OS, "Probabilistic seismic assessment of structure, foundation, and soil interacting systems", Ph.D., pp.2007
- 이영주, "A new methodology of the development of seismic fragility curves", Smart Structures and Systems, An International Journal, 14(5), pp.847~867 (2014), 국제구조공학회
- Lee SM, "Seismic fragility analysis of steel liquid storage tanks using earthquake ground motions recorded in Korea", Math Probl Eng (2019)
- Lee YJ, "Finite element system reliability analysis of a wing torque box", Proc. 10th AIAA Nondeterministic Approaches Conference (2008)
- Cornell CA, "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines", J Struct Eng, 128(4), pp.526~533 (2002)
- 이재범, "A new methodology development for flood fragility curve derivation considering structural deterioration for bridges", Smart Structures and Systems, An International Journal, 17(1), pp.149~165 (2016), 국제구조공학회
- Der Kiureghian A, "Fisrt- and second-order reliability methods" (2005), CRC press
- Padgett JE, "Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges", Earthq Eng Struct D, 37(8), pp.1157~1174 (2008)
- Mangalathu S, "Probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment of tall horizontally curved concrete bridges in California", J Perform Constr Fac, 32(6) (2018)
- Ramamoorthy SK, "Probabilistic demand models and fragility curves for reinforced concrete frames", J Struct Eng, 132(10), pp.1563~1572 (2006)
- Liu PL, "Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances", Probabilist Eng Mech, 1(2), pp.105~112 (1986)
- Haukaas T, "Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering", Ph.D., pp.2003
- Yoon SS, "Seismic fragility analysis of a buried pipeline structure considering uncertainty of soil parameters", Int J Pres Ves Pip, 175, pp.103932~ (2019)
- Abdella K, "Inversion of a full-range stress–strain relation for stainless steel alloys", Int J Nonlin Mech, 41(3), pp.456~463 (2006)
- ASCE, "Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe", American Lifelines Alliance, ~ (2001)
- Keshtegar B, "Reliability analysis of corroded pipes using conjugate HL–RF algorithm based on average shear stress yield criterion", Eng Fail Anal, 46, pp.104~117 (2014)
- Zarrin M, "Probabilistic seismic collapse analysis of jacket offshore platforms", J Offshore Mech Arct, 140(3) (2018)
- Shinozuka M, "Some aspects of seismic risk analysis of underground lifeline systems", 101(1), pp.31~43 (1979)