지진취약도 곡선 생성시 선택된 지진파 수에 따른 입력변수 변화에 관한 연구
A Study of the Relationship Between Number of Ground Motions and Parameters of Seismic Fragility Curve
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Seismic fragility curves present the conditional probability of damage to target structures due to external seismic load and are widely used in various ways. When constructing such a seismic fragility curve, it is essential to consider various types and numbers of ground motions. In general, the earthquake occurrence characteristics of an area where the target structure of the seismic fragility curve exists are analyzed, and based on this, appropriate ground motions are selected to derive the seismic fragility curve. If the number of selected ground motions is large, the diversity of ground motions is considered, but a large amount of computational time is required. Conversely, if the number of ground motions is too small, the diversity of ground motions cannot be considered, which may distort the seismic fragility curve. Therefore, this study analyzed the relationship between the number of ground motions considered when deriving the seismic fragility curve and the parameters of the seismic fragility curve. Using two example structures, numerical analysis was performed by selecting a random number of ground motions from a total of two hundred, and a seismic fragility curve was derived based on the results. Analysis of the relationship of the parameter of the seismic fragility curve and the number of selected ground motions was performed. As the number of ground motions considered increases, uncertainty in ground motion selection decreases, and when deriving seismic fragility curves considering the same number of ground motions, uncertainty increases relatively as the degree of freedom of the target structure increases. However, considering a relatively large number of ground motions, uncertainty appeared insignificant regardless of increased degrees of freedom. Finally, it is possible that the increase in the number of ground motions could lower the epistemic uncertainty and thus improve the reliability of the results.
Abstract
Seismic fragility curves present the conditional probability of damage to target structures due to external seismic load and are widely used in various ways. When constructing such a seismic fragility curve, it is essential to consider various types and numbers of ground motions. In general, the earthquake occurrence characteristics of an area where the target structure of the seismic fragility curve exists are analyzed, and based on this, appropriate ground motions are selected to derive the seismic fragility curve. If the number of selected ground motions is large, the diversity of ground motions is considered, but a large amount of computational time is required. Conversely, if the number of ground motions is too small, the diversity of ground motions cannot be considered, which may distort the seismic fragility curve. Therefore, this study analyzed the relationship between the number of ground motions considered when deriving the seismic fragility curve and the parameters of the seismic fragility curve. Using two example structures, numerical analysis was performed by selecting a random number of ground motions from a total of two hundred, and a seismic fragility curve was derived based on the results. Analysis of the relationship of the parameter of the seismic fragility curve and the number of selected ground motions was performed. As the number of ground motions considered increases, uncertainty in ground motion selection decreases, and when deriving seismic fragility curves considering the same number of ground motions, uncertainty increases relatively as the degree of freedom of the target structure increases. However, considering a relatively large number of ground motions, uncertainty appeared insignificant regardless of increased degrees of freedom. Finally, it is possible that the increase in the number of ground motions could lower the epistemic uncertainty and thus improve the reliability of the results.
참고문헌 (25)
- "U.S. Geological Survey"[URL]
- Kennedy RP, "Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies", Nucl Eng Des, 79, pp.47~68 (1984)
- Methodology for Developing Seismic Fragilities, "EPRI", Palo Alto, ~ (1994)
- Shinozuka M, "Statistical analysis of fragility curves", J Eng Mech, 126(12), pp.1224~1231 (2000)
- Porter K, "Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering", Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), pp.471~489 (2007)
- Baker JW, "Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection", Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 35(9), pp.1077~1095 (2006)
- Baker JW, "Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis", Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), pp.579~599 (2015)
- Jeong GH, "Seismic fragility analysis of high-rise rc box-type wall building structures", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 20(3), pp.155~162 (2016)
- Park HS, "Seismic fragilities of bridges and transmission towers considering recorded ground motions in South Korea", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 20(7 Special), pp.435~441 (2016)
- Jeon SH, "Seismic Fragility Assessment for Korean high-rise non-seismic RC shear wall apartment buildings", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 24(6), pp.293~303 (2020)
- Kim J, "Seismic fragility function for existing low-rise piloti-type buildings reflecting damage from Pohang earthquake", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 25(6), pp.251~259 (2021)
- Aldea S, "Seismic fragility assessment of Chilean skewed highway bridges", Engineering Structures, 249(15), pp.113300~ (2021)
- Lee S, "Comparative study on seismic fragility curve derivation methods of buried pipeline using finite element analysis", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 27(5), pp.213~220 (2023)
- Vamvatsikos D, "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 31(3), pp.491~514 (2002)
- Vamvatsikos D, "Applied incremental dynamic analysis", Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), pp.523~553 (2004)
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), "Quantification of building seismic performance factors" (2009), Federal Emergency Management Agency
- Nakamura T, "A study on failure probability of highway bridge by earthquake based on statistical method", Proceedings of the 10th Japanese Earthquake Engineering Symposium (1998)
- Yi S, "Appraisal and mathematical properties of fragility analysis models", The 13th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 2021) (2021)
- Kunnath S K, "Modeling a nd r esponse prediction in performance-based seismic evaluation : Case studies of instrumented steel moment-frame buildings", Earthquake Spectra, 20(3), pp.883~915 (2004)
- Kalkan E, "Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings", Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), pp.367~390 (2006)
- Practical guidelines to select and scale earthquake records for nonlinear response history analysis of structures, "Kalkan E", Geological Survey, 124~, pp.File Report 2010-1068 (2010)
- Implications of the landers and big bear earthquakes on earthquake resistant design of structures, "Anderson JC", Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, ~ (1997)
- McKenna FT, "Object-Oriented Finite Element Programming:Frameworks for Analysis, Algorithms and Parallel Computing", pp.1997
- Rezaei S, "Seismic performance evaluation of steel structures equipped with dissipative columns", J Build Eng, 29, pp.101227~ (2020)
- Performance of a 13-story steel moment-resisting frame damaged in the 1994 Northridge earthquake, "Uang CM", Structural Systems Research, University of California, ~ (1995)