몽골 고대 서사문학에 나타난기형 모티프와 신성에 대한 알레고리 2 - 외눈박이의 대장장이 화소를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Deformity Motif and Allegory of Divinity in Ancient Mongolian Narrative Literature 2 - With a focus on the blacksmith motif of one-eyed characters -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this study were to trace the common meanings of one-eyed characters in Mongolian narrative literature and examine their relations with blacksmiths. There are three types of one-eyed characters including the animal, monster, and human types. Those who have “Sohor” in their names would seem like special beings with only one eye, perspicacity or clairvoyance. “Sohor” is used as a metaphor for “one-eyed persons,” “eyes that can see very far,” or “eyes of wisdom.” Even though the story units of blacksmiths are not much apparent in the name of “Sohor,” there seem to be certain connections between one-eyed characters and blacksmiths based on the universal nature of the former. The human-type one-eyed being “Sohor” is also considered as a humanized literary embodiment of a huge one-eyed animal that has long been passed down since the very old times. Those Sohors are regarded as the latter version of one-eyed beings with the one-eyed figure holding symbolic significance rather than actuality. The monster-type one-eyed Sohors are the negative embodiments of monster figure with the story units of blacksmiths disclosed in them indirectly. The child-type one-eyed beings take the form of god of hell that was reborn in the mundane world by the gods of Heaven with the story units of blacksmiths reflected in them consistently. The animal-type one-eyed beings are animals in the family of dark gods, having the ability to see very far like other one-eyed figures and revealing their ferocious cannibal habits. The one-eyed characters in the ancient Mongolian narrative literature are closely related to the cultural heroes called blacksmiths at the core. In a pastoral society, blacksmiths were called “dark blacksmiths,” being depicted as devil incarnates or death-related beings in narrative literature as negative concepts such as a sorcerer and cannibal devil were attached to them and amplified in them along with such personalities as a god of hell, mundane world, dark god, and incantatory rain.
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to trace the common meanings of one-eyed characters in Mongolian narrative literature and examine their relations with blacksmiths. There are three types of one-eyed characters including the animal, monster, and human types. Those who have “Sohor” in their names would seem like special beings with only one eye, perspicacity or clairvoyance. “Sohor” is used as a metaphor for “one-eyed persons,” “eyes that can see very far,” or “eyes of wisdom.” Even though the story units of blacksmiths are not much apparent in the name of “Sohor,” there seem to be certain connections between one-eyed characters and blacksmiths based on the universal nature of the former. The human-type one-eyed being “Sohor” is also considered as a humanized literary embodiment of a huge one-eyed animal that has long been passed down since the very old times. Those Sohors are regarded as the latter version of one-eyed beings with the one-eyed figure holding symbolic significance rather than actuality. The monster-type one-eyed Sohors are the negative embodiments of monster figure with the story units of blacksmiths disclosed in them indirectly. The child-type one-eyed beings take the form of god of hell that was reborn in the mundane world by the gods of Heaven with the story units of blacksmiths reflected in them consistently. The animal-type one-eyed beings are animals in the family of dark gods, having the ability to see very far like other one-eyed figures and revealing their ferocious cannibal habits. The one-eyed characters in the ancient Mongolian narrative literature are closely related to the cultural heroes called blacksmiths at the core. In a pastoral society, blacksmiths were called “dark blacksmiths,” being depicted as devil incarnates or death-related beings in narrative literature as negative concepts such as a sorcerer and cannibal devil were attached to them and amplified in them along with such personalities as a god of hell, mundane world, dark god, and incantatory rain.
참고문헌 (33)
- С.Бадамхатан, "Монгол улсын угсаатны зүй 2боть" (1996), УБ
- Д.Бямбадорж, "Тэнгэр шүлтэгийн амин судар" (2004), УБ
- Г.Бигүүдэй, "Аман уламжлал ба ≪Монголын нууц товчоон≫" (2000), УБ
- Той.Галсан, "Монгол, эртний гэрэгийн ижил төстэй хорин нэгэн домог сэлтийн д ээж бичиг, 미발표 저서", ~
- С.Дулам, "Монгол домог зүйн дүр" (1989), УБ
- Л.Жамсран бусад, "Монголын түүхийн бага нэвтэрхий толь Ⅱ" (2000), УБ
- Б.Катуу, "Баяд ардын тууль" (2001), УБ
- qО.Сүхбаатар, "Монгол харь үгийн толь" (1997), УБ
- О.Пүрэв, "Монгол бөөгийн шашин" (1999), УБ
- Г.Саранхүү, "үндэсний монгол судлал №7" (2006), УБ
- Л.Түдэв, "Аман хууль" (2000), УБ
- Д.Цэрэнсодном, "Монгол туульсын зохиол дахь домог-үлгэрийн ойлголт" (1988), УБ
- Д.Цэрэнсодном, "Монгол ардын домог үлгэр" (1989), УБ
- Д. Цэрэнсодном, "Монголын нууц товчоо" (2000), УБ
- 강은해, "대장장이 신화와 야장(冶匠) 체험-한·중·일 대장장이 신화를 중심으로-", 한중인문학연구, (12), pp.168~211 (2004), 한중인문학회
- 강은해, "동아시아의 대장장이 신화 연구 - 한, 중, 일, 베트남 설화를 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(16), pp.279~319 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
- 게르트 호르스트 슈마허, "기형의 역사" (2001), 자작
- 김선자, "동북아 활쏘기 신화와 중화주의 신화론 비판" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 라이너 테츠너, "게르만 신화와 전설" (2008), 범우사
- 미르치아 엘리아데, "대장장이와 연금술사" (1999), 문학동네
- 미르치아 엘리아데, "세계종교사상사" (2008), 이학사
- 아리엘 골란, "선사시대가 남긴 세계의 모든 문양" (2004), 푸른역사
- 유재원, "신화를 통해 본 그리스 선사시대 대장장이 부족", 국제지역연구, 3(4) (1999), 한국외대 외국학종합연구센터
- 이두현, "단골무와 야장-동북아세아 샤머니즘과 한국무속과의 비교연구②-", 정신문화연구, 16(1)통권 : 50 (1993)
- 진성기, "신화와 전설" (2005), 제주민속연구소
- 진쿠퍼, "그림으로 보는 세계문화상징사전" (2000), 까치
- 최정은, "동물 ․ 괴물지 엠블럼 중세의 지식과 상징" (2005), 휴머니시트
- 피에르 그리말, "그리스 로마 신화사전" (2009), 열린책들
- 데.체렌소드놈, "몽골민족의 기원신화" (2001), 울란바타르대학교출판부
- V.Y.프로프, "민담의 역사적 기원" (1999), 문학과지성사
- 헤시오도스, "신통기" (2004), 한길사
- 호메로스, "오디세이아" (2011), 돋을새김
- 한국정신문화연구원, "한국민족문화대백과사전, <도깨비>" (1996)
