본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

契丹语动词“卒”考释

Interpretation of the Khitan Verb “Zu (die)”

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

契丹语动词形态是契丹语动词的一项重要研究内容。笔者通过考察迄今公开发表的契丹文碑刻文献中表示“卒”的契丹语动词不同形态, 观察到动词丙在句中用作“卒”和“无”。其中, 用作义“卒”时, 句中主语均为女性单数, 而作义“无”时, 句中主语均为男性单数; □□义为“卒”, 句中主语均为男性单数; □□(□夯)亦义为“卒”, 句中主语均为女性复数的现象。因此, 笔者认为契丹语句中确实存在主语与谓语间的“数”和谐和“性”和谐现象; 动词丙即与女性主语共处, 又与男性主语共处, 说明前人提出的“阴性可兼指阳性”规律亦适用于句中主语与谓语间的“性”和谐现象; 动词词尾□表示男性单数, 且只跟男性主语共处, 与前人提出的“阳性只指阳性, 不能兼指阴性”的论点一致; 动词词尾□(夯)表示女性复数。此外, 笔者通过“元音附加法”, 解释了□□及和“耶鲁”在语音上的联系; 而且考证了《高》凿刻年代或不晚于乾亨六年(1106年)。

Abstract

The form of the Khitan verb is an important research content of the Khitan verb. By investigating the different forms of the verbs denoting “zu” in the Khitan inscriptions published so far, the author observes that the verb 丙 refers to “zu” and “wu(do not have)”. When it is used as “zu”, the subject in the sentence is female singular, while when it is used as “wu”, the subject is male singular. □□ denotes “zu”. When it is used as a predicatein a sentence, the subject of it is male singular. When □□(□夯)is used as a predicate of a sentence, the subject of it is female plural. Therefore, the author holds that in Khitan sentences, there do exist the phenomena of “number” harmony and “gender” harmony between the subject and the predicate. The fact that the verb 丙 goes with female subject as well as male subject proves that the rule “the suffixes and words that modify the “feminine gender” in Khitan have the function of modifying the “masculine gender”” put forward by the predecessor is also applicable to the “gender” harmony phenomenon between subject and predicate in Khitan sentences. The verb suffix □ denotes male singular. The fact that it goes only with male subjects is consistent with the argument “the suffixes and words that modify the “masculine gender” cannot refer to the ”feminine gender”” proposed by the predecessor. Besides, the author explains the phonological connection between □□及 and “Yelu(person name)”through “Vowel Appending Method”, and with textual research, holds that the chiseled year of “Gao” was no later than the sixth year of Qian Heng (1106).

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 爱新觉罗, "契丹语言文字研究", 京都大学东亚历史文化 研究会 (2004)
  2. 爱新觉罗, "契丹文墓志より見た辽史" (2006), 松香堂
  3. 刘凤翥, "契丹文字研究类编(全四册)" (2014), 中华书局
  4. 吉如何, "新发现契丹小字〈耶律天你太师墓志铭〉研究", 博士, pp.2017
  5. 即实, "谜田耕耘―契丹小字解读续" (2012), 辽宁民族出版社
  6. 清格尔泰, "清格尔泰文集(第 5 卷)" (2010), 内蒙古出版集团内蒙古科学技术出版社
  7. 清格尔泰, "契丹小字研究" (1985), 中国社会科学出版社
  8. 清格尔泰, "契丹小字再研究(全三册)" (2017), 内蒙古大学出版社
  9. 吴英喆, "契丹小字中的“元音附加法”", 民族语文, (4) (2007)
  10. 吴英喆, "契丹语静词语法范畴研究" (2007), 内蒙古大学出版社
  11. 吴英喆, "契丹小字指示代词考释", 中西文化交流学报, 5(1) (2013)
  12. 吴英喆, "再论契丹文天干阴阳之别", 北方文化研究 (2014)
  13. 脱脱等, "辽史(修订本,全五册)" (2016), 中华书局
  14. 夏征农, "辞海" (1979), 上海辞书出版社出版
  15. 栗林均, "确精扎布:『元朝秘史』モンゴル語全单語·語尾索引" (2001), 东 北大学东北アジア研究センター
  16. 内蒙古大学蒙古学研究院蒙古语文研究所, "蒙汉词典" (1999), 内蒙古大学出版社
  17. 蒙古学百科全书《语言文字卷》编辑委员会, "蒙古学百科全书·语言文字" (2010), 内蒙古人民出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)