최근 중국 학계의 韓․中 관계사 연구 시각과 논점 - 1992년 修交 以後를 중심으로 -
Analytical Approaches on Recent Chinese Studies on the History of Modern Sino-Korean Relations
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In retrospective, the Chinese studies on the history of Sino-Korean relations were not heated research field, in particular concerning modern and contemporary period. In this period, on the one hand, the secular ‘tributary system’ having regulated Sino-Korean relations changed dramatically. And China and Korea were all together incorporated into the “nation-states system” imposed by Western powers, in the wake of which Sino-Korean relations were not to develop “normally”. On the other hand, given the relatively weak place and role of Korea in China’s external relations, few Chinese scholars had attentively engaged in this field. However, after the diplomatic normalization between Korea and China since 1992, studies on the field began to be active and produced various research results. This article outlines these recent research trends and shows Chinese scholars’ points of view and characteristic perspectives. First, Chinese scholars have actively engaged in compiling new historical materials of the field. The materials originated mainly from local Archives, various newspapers, and testimonies and memoirs of the persons concerned. Second, Chinese new generations of scholarship, particularly recent master’s theses and Ph. D dissertations show new angles different from that of the past. They stress positive aspects of the Qing intervention in Chosun affaires in the late 19th Century(“reinforcement of tributary system”). Studies on the Korean independence movement developed in China deal with right and left wings altogether instead of focusing on the left wing movement only. It is particularly worth nothing that many scholars’ attention has been drawn to the Chinese Communist Parties’ support to Korean independence movement. Third, studies on the Sino-Korean border disputes and Korean War are, however, in the standstill, showing the similar points of views as those of the past. In this point, it would not be adequate that relatively free migrations of Korean people to the Manchuria in the turning period to ‘modern’ era having caused border line conflicts are considered as a territorial aggression of the Chosun Dynasty. As for Korean War, Chinese scholars still stress the legitimacy of the China’s intervention, the CCP’s decisions’ correctness, the importance of Mao’s decisions, and so forth. Fourth, Chinese scholars of the field move their attention to various subjects instead of confining themselves on the politico-diplomatic issues. They adopt microscopic approaches as analytical methods for the studies of Korean independence movement and ‘Korean Diasporas’ formed in China’s local society. These studies would lead to close survey on the realities of Korean life in the given localities. In perspective, the Chinese studies on the Sino-Korean relations, the author mentions, would be a heated research field as two counties have close correlations. Cultural and economic field would newly draw scholars’ attention, including intellectual exchanges and ‘Chinese overseas’ in Korea.
Abstract
In retrospective, the Chinese studies on the history of Sino-Korean relations were not heated research field, in particular concerning modern and contemporary period. In this period, on the one hand, the secular ‘tributary system’ having regulated Sino-Korean relations changed dramatically. And China and Korea were all together incorporated into the “nation-states system” imposed by Western powers, in the wake of which Sino-Korean relations were not to develop “normally”. On the other hand, given the relatively weak place and role of Korea in China’s external relations, few Chinese scholars had attentively engaged in this field. However, after the diplomatic normalization between Korea and China since 1992, studies on the field began to be active and produced various research results. This article outlines these recent research trends and shows Chinese scholars’ points of view and characteristic perspectives. First, Chinese scholars have actively engaged in compiling new historical materials of the field. The materials originated mainly from local Archives, various newspapers, and testimonies and memoirs of the persons concerned. Second, Chinese new generations of scholarship, particularly recent master’s theses and Ph. D dissertations show new angles different from that of the past. They stress positive aspects of the Qing intervention in Chosun affaires in the late 19th Century(“reinforcement of tributary system”). Studies on the Korean independence movement developed in China deal with right and left wings altogether instead of focusing on the left wing movement only. It is particularly worth nothing that many scholars’ attention has been drawn to the Chinese Communist Parties’ support to Korean independence movement. Third, studies on the Sino-Korean border disputes and Korean War are, however, in the standstill, showing the similar points of views as those of the past. In this point, it would not be adequate that relatively free migrations of Korean people to the Manchuria in the turning period to ‘modern’ era having caused border line conflicts are considered as a territorial aggression of the Chosun Dynasty. As for Korean War, Chinese scholars still stress the legitimacy of the China’s intervention, the CCP’s decisions’ correctness, the importance of Mao’s decisions, and so forth. Fourth, Chinese scholars of the field move their attention to various subjects instead of confining themselves on the politico-diplomatic issues. They adopt microscopic approaches as analytical methods for the studies of Korean independence movement and ‘Korean Diasporas’ formed in China’s local society. These studies would lead to close survey on the realities of Korean life in the given localities. In perspective, the Chinese studies on the Sino-Korean relations, the author mentions, would be a heated research field as two counties have close correlations. Cultural and economic field would newly draw scholars’ attention, including intellectual exchanges and ‘Chinese overseas’ in Korea.
참고문헌 (164)
- 한철호, "근대 한중 국경조약과 국경 문제의 연구 현황과 과제, in: 한중관계사 연구의 성과와 과제" (2003)
- 고구려연구재단, "한중관계사 연구논저 목록(근․현대)", pp.456~452 (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 김춘선, "鴨綠. 豆滿江 국경 문제에 관한 한·중 양국의 연구 동향", 한국사학보, 12 (2002)
- 金昌浩, "申采浩在北京的文學活動, in: 中國朝鮮族文化活動" (1993), 民族出版社
- 李愛順, "朝鮮舞蹈家崔承喜對中國舞蹈的影響", 高麗學硏究, 1 (1993)
- 崔雄勸, "魯迅與現代朝鮮文學, in: 朝鮮學-韓國學與中國學" (1993)
- 鄒振環, "近代中韓文化交流史上的金澤榮", 韓國硏究論叢, 5 (1998)
- 金者, "試論李陸史對中國現代文學的批評與接受", 當代韓國, 4 (2002)
- 王爲平, "鲁迅在韓國的接收, 影響與与研究-鲁迅接受史研究", 鲁迅研究月刊, 1 (2003)
- 謝俊美, "20世紀前半期中國共産黨人的韓國觀", 鹽城師範學院學報(人文社会科學版), 4 (2004)
- 杜春和, "朝鮮“三一運動”及中朝友誼的發展", 當代韓國, 1-2 (1994)
- 經盛鴻, "韓國抗日組織在南京地區的活動(1932-1937.11)", 江蘇社會科學, 4 (2004)
- 崔志鷹, "韓國臨時政府在上海的敎育活動", 檔案與史學, 5 (1995)
- 楊雨蕾, "“韓國臨時政府在中國(杭州)”會議綜述", 當代韓國, 4 (2003)
- 楊耀健, "韓國臨時政府在重慶", 文史精華, 12 (1996)
- 馮開文, "韓國臨時政府在陪都", 韓國研究論叢, 5 (1998)
- 重慶市檔案館, "有關韓國光復軍在渝情況的一組史料(1941-1946年)", 檔案史料與研究, 4 (1999)
- 楊紅梅, "中共華北敵後報刊與朝鮮獨立運動", 韓國研究論叢, 2 (1996)
- 孫剛璇, "抗戰勝利後韓國光復軍在北平活動史料", 北京檔案史料, 1 (2003)
- 李旻, "韓國獨立運動與鎭江", 華東船舶工業學院學報(社會科學版), 4 (2004)
- 李永春, "長沙中韓互助社成立时間和社址考", 近代史研究, 3 (2005)
- 徐萬民, "雲南陸軍講武堂與韓國民族解放運動", 雲南民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 5 (2005)
- 王梅, "抗戰时期西安韓國光復軍事略", 文博, 3 (2005)
- 陳英, "復國運動的重要場所抗戰鬪爭的特別貢獻-韓國獨立運動在安徽", 滁州學院學報, 2 (2005)
- 鄭龍發, "韓國獨立運動在安徽", 池州師專學報, 4 (2002)
- 楊昭全, "孫中山與朝鮮革命", 延邊大學學報, 2 (1993)
- 孫玉梅, "孫中山與韓國獨立運動", 改革與探索, 5-6 (1995)
- 崔鳳奉, "黄埔軍校與朝鮮民族, in: 中國朝鮮族史研究" (1993), 延邊大學出版社
- 金香花, "黄埔軍校出身的中國朝鮮族革命者在延邊", 延邊大學學報, 3 (2003)
- 傅德華, "于右任與韓國獨立運動", 韓國研究論叢, 1 (1995)
- 石源華, "重評孫中山會見韓國臨時政府專使申奎植", 復旦學報, 5 (1995)
- 鄧元忠, "力行社援韓兩種記載的比較", ~
- 徐有威, "戰前力行社, 國民黨中組部援韓獨立之研究"
- "韓國獨立運動血史新論" (1996), 上海人民出版社
- 馬長林, "中國濟難會與韓國獨", 韓國研究論叢, 5 (1998)
- 朴英姬, "試論朝鮮民族革命黨與中國國民黨的關係", 民國檔案, 2 (1999)
- 楊天石, "蔣介石與韓國獨立運動", 抗日戰爭研究, 4 (2000)
- 邵雍, "1932年虹口公園爆炸案與中國各方的關係", 上海師範大學學報, 4 (2003)
- 余建華, "一段難忘的珍貴歷史：‘中國共産黨與朝鮮獨立運動’學術硏討會綜述", 史林, 2 (1993)
- 石源華, "中國共産黨援助朝鮮獨立運動紀事1921-1945" (2000), 中國社會科學出版社
- 方永春, "中國在華大韓民國臨時政府的援助", 抗日戰爭研究, 3 (1994)
- 徐有威, "1931-1937年間國民政府與朝鮮獨立運動", 抗日戰爭研究, 2 (1994)
- 石源華, "論抗日戰爭期間國民政府的援助政", 抗日戰爭研究, 2 (1994)
- 徐矛, "中國國民黨與韓國獨立運動的幾個問題", 復旦學報, 5 (1995)
- 石建國, "試論抗戰時期韓國獨立黨與中國國民黨的關係", 檔案與史學, 2 (1998)
- 齊玉東, "中國共産黨與朝鮮獨立同盟", 邯鄲師專學報, 4 (2002)
- 鄭成宏, "中韓友誼之樹長清-中國共産黨支持韓國獨立運動的歷史見證", 當代韓國, 1 (2005)
- 石源華, "抗戰時期的中國共産黨與朝鮮義勇隊", 軍事歷史研究, 3 (2003)
- 張摸超, "談國民政府協調韓國反日獨立運動「部黨派之紛爭", 重慶師院學報, 2 (2000)
- 崔志鷹, "韓國獨立黨的三均主義與孫中山的三民主義之比較", 史林, 3 (1996)
- 秦弓, "20世紀初葉中, 韓, 日啓蒙文學的比較", 江蘇社會科學, 6 (2003)
- 崔志鷹, "朝鮮三一運動和我國五四運動的比較研究", 史林, 4 (1995)
- 程光煒, "“五四運動”和“三一運動”中知識分子身分的現代轉換", 湖北師範學院學報, 2 (2004)
- 張德旺, "關于三一運動對中國五四運動的影響的研究情況", 當代韓國, 1 (1997)
- 張德旺, "朝鮮三一運動對中國五四運動的影響", 哈爾濱工業大學學報, 4 (2000)
- 陽天石, "黃遵憲的《朝鮮策略》及其風波", 近代史研究, 4 (1994)
- 李德征, "論中韓兩國近代史上的愛國主義", 山東大學學報, 4 (1994)
- 鄒振環, "淸末亡國史‘編譯熱’與梁啓超的亡國史研究", 韓國研究論叢, 2 (1996)
- 崔玉山, "申采浩與梁啓超：歷史主体認識及“新國民”構想", 延邊大學學報, 2 (2005)
- 寧秀艷, "十九世紀末中朝兩國民權思想比較研究" (2006), 延邊大學碩士論文
- 胡志强, "《海國圖志》與中朝日啓蒙思想", 석사, pp.2004
- 孫科志, "일제시대 상해 한인 사회 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- "二-三十年代的上海韓人社會", 韓國學報, 16 (2000), 中華民國韓國研究學會
- "상해 한인 사회사: 1910-1945" (2001), 한울 아카데미
- 崔志鷹, "舊上海朝鮮僑民的經濟及文化生活", 社會科學, 9 (1994)
- 趙蘭亮, "試論抗戰勝利後上海的韓國僑民團體", 學術月刊, 12 (2000)
- 方建昌, "日文檔案所反映的1927-1945年間朝鮮僑民在北平狀況状况", 北京檔案史料, 3 (2000)
- 甘 露, "抗戰時期重慶的韓僑研究", 碩士, pp.2008
- 齊玉東, "華北朝鮮靑年聯合會述略", 邯鄲職業技術學院學報, 4 (2002)
- 馬安平, "近代朝鮮族移民我國東北線索梳理", 遼寧敎育行政學院學報, 1 (1997)
- 房建昌, "廣東韓僑小史及戰後國民黨對德, 意, 法等僑民的處理", 廣東史志, 2 (1999)
- 孫春日, "民國時期東北朝鮮族“雙重國籍”問題的始末", 東疆學刊, 4 (2000)
- 張愛花, "論淸末民初的朝鮮族國籍問題", 大連民族學院學報, 4 (2003)
- 徐行, "中韓关關係上的重要一頁—戰後天津暨華北韓僑的集中管理與遣返", 近代史研究, 4 (2005)
- 馬軍, "戰後國民政府遣返韓人政策的演變及在上海地區的實踐", 史林, 2 (2006)
- 傅德華, "中國近代韓僑問題研究綜述", 學術月刊, 4 (2003)
- 丁進軍, "遠世凱駐節朝鮮期間函牘選輯(上, 下)", 歷史檔案, 2-3 (1992)
- 葉渡, "新發現<吳長慶, 閔泳翊等筆談録>", 韓國學論文集, 3 (1994)
- 陸大鉞, "重慶市檔案館館藏韓國臨時政府槪述", 檔案史料與研究, 2-3 (2000)
- 重慶市檔案館, "有關韓國光復軍在渝情況的一組史料(1941-1946年)", 檔案史料與研究, 4 (1999)
- 上海市檔案館, "中國地域韓人團體關係史料滙編(一)(二)" (1999), 東方出版中心
- 石源華, "上海地區韓國獨立運動史料述論", 民國檔案, 4 (2003)
- 房建昌, "1922至1932年的上海韓國勞兵會", 檔案與史學学, 4 (1997)
- 劉金質等編, "中朝中韓關係文件資料滙編：1919-1949(上, 中, 下)" (2000), 中國社會科學出版社
- "近代韓國獨立運動在上海出版物研究"[URL]
- 고구려연구재단, "한중관계사 연구논저 목록(근·현대)", pp.52~134 (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 전해종, "한중관계사연구" (1970), 일조각
- Henry Wheaton, "Elements of International law: With a Sketch of the History of the Science", pp.52~ (1936), Carey, Lea & Blanchard
- 박원호, "근대 이전 한중관계사에 대한 시각과 논점", 한국사시민강좌, 40 (2007)
- 鄭惠仲, "淸史稿 屬國傳 朝鮮 關係 記事 分析", 중국사연구, (51), pp.295~323 (2007), 중국사학회
- 한영우, "역사학 및 고고학의 회고와 전망, in: 서울大學校 學問硏究 40年", pp.205~ (1987), 서울대학교 출판부
- 白新良, "中朝關係史—明淸時期", pp.429~ (2002), 世界知識出版社
- 구선희, "청일전쟁의 의미 - 조·청 ‘속방’ 관계를 중심으로-", 한국근현대사연구, (37), pp.92~125 (2006), 한국근현대사학회
- 김기혁, "근대 초기의 韓․淸․日 관계의 전개―甲申政變에 미친 영향을 중심으로―", 季刊京鄕 思想과 政策, (가을) (1984)
- 孔繁敏, "晩淸對韓政策的演變與敎訓", 北京聯合大學學報, 3 (2002)
- 苑宏光, "論晚淸時期的中朝關係", 長春師範學院學報, 6, pp.40~ (2002)
- 張 磊, "“朴定陽事件”與中朝宗藩關係的變化", 碩士, pp.2007
- 宋慧娟, "淸代中朝宗藩關係嬗邊研究", 博士, pp.2005
- 林明的, "李鴻章對朝鮮的宗藩政策(1882-1894)", 韓國研究論叢, pp.117~118 (1995)
- 孔繁敏, "晩淸對韓政策的演變與敎訓", pp.39~
- 王俊祥, "論甲午戰後中朝關係演變(1895—1900", 碩士, pp.2006
- 具仙姬, "韓國 近代 對淸政策史 硏究" (1999), 혜안
- 謝世誠, "李鸿章與朝鮮", 江蘇社會科學, 6 (2006)
- 宋娜娜, "朝鮮“壬午兵變”與淸對朝政策研究", 碩士, pp.2006
- 金源模, "袁世凱의 韓半島 安保策(1886)", 東洋學, 16 (1986)
- 楊天石, "黃遵憲的《朝鮮鲜策略》及其風波", 近代史研究, 3 (1994)
- 李里峰, "何如璋與新朝鮮政策的實施", 徐州師範大學學報, 4 (2001)
- 梁英華, "試論黃遵憲, 曾經澤, 袁世凱在19世紀80年代對朝鮮的外交策略", 韓國學論文集, 10 (2002)
- 孫 昉, "晚淸中國用條約强化中朝宗藩關係的失敗(1876—1895)", 煙臺大學學報, 4, pp.461~465 (2005)
- 張磊, "“朴定陽事件”與中朝宗藩關係的變化", pp.46~
- 苑宏光, "論晚淸時期的中朝關係", pp.41~
- 高强, "甲午戰爭前淸韓宗藩關係的强化及其後果", 煙臺大學學報, 3 (2005)
- 紀能文, "關于袁世凯在朝鮮活動的歷史考察", 安陽師範學院學報, 1, pp.23~26 (2001)
- 宋娜娜, "朝鮮“壬午兵變”與淸對朝政策研究", pp.36~
- 曹力强, "淸政府對朝鮮海關的控制", 東北師大學報, 2, pp.51~ (1995)
- 崔艷春, "論晚淸中國與朝鮮經貿關係的發展", 碩士, pp.2006
- 宋慧娟, "簡析《中朝商民水陸通商章程》對中朝關係的影響", 吉林省敎育學院學報, (9), pp.60~ (2006)
- 宋慧娟, "淸代中朝宗藩關係嬗邊研究", pp.192~
- 蔡建, "大韓帝國與中國的外交關係", 博士, pp.2004
- 孫昉, "晚淸中國用條約强化中朝宗藩關係的失敗(1876-1895)", 煙臺大學學報, (4), pp.465~ (2005)
- 姜龍範, "關于淸季中朝邊務交涉的研究", 延邊大學學報, (1), pp.50~ (1998)
- 孫春日, "淸末中朝日“間島問題”交涉之原委", 中國邊疆史志, 12(4) (2002)
- 孔繁敏, "晩淸對韓政策的演變與敎訓", pp.38~
- 姜龍範, "19世紀末20世紀初東亞政治風雲與中朝外交爭端争", 延邊大學學報, (3), pp.19~ (1998)
- 馬大正, "近代東北亞國際關係史研究的新進展——讀姜龍範著 『近代中朝日三國對間島朝鮮人政策研究』", 中國邊疆史地研究, (4) (2000)
- 楊昭全, "中朝邊界史" (1993), 吉林文史出版社
- 刁書仁, "中朝邊界沿革史研究", 中國邊疆史地研究, (4) (2001)
- 張存武, "淸代中韓邊務問題探源", 中央研究院近代史研究所輯刊, (2) (1971)
- 배성준, "한·중의 간도문제 인식과 갈등구조", 동양학, (43), pp.339~357 (2008), 동양학연구소
- 이성환, "간도문제 연구의 회고와 전망*- 새로운 연구지평의 확장을 위한 비판적 검토 -", 백산학보, (76), pp.611~643 (2006), 백산학회
- 胡春惠, "中國 안의 韓國獨立運動" (1978), 단국대학교출판부
- 楊昭全, "韓國獨立同盟與朝鮮義勇軍, in: 韓國獨立運動硏究" (1999), 學苑出版社
- 石源華, "韓國獨立運動政黨與社團研究", pp.200~ (2003), 中國社會科學出版社
- 石源華, "論中國共産黨與韓國臨時政府的關係, in: 韓國獨立運動研究" (1999), 學苑出版社
- 崔鳳春, "大韓民國臨時政府與中華民國政府之關係, in: 韓國獨立運動研究" (1999), 學苑出版社
- 吳景平, "關于國民政府與韓國臨時政府關係的若干思考, in: 大韓民國臨時政府在杭州", pp.227~ (2008), 國際文化出公司
- 石源華, "論中日戰爭期間的韓國臨時政府", 韓國研究論叢, 1, pp.66~69 (1995)
- 楊昭全, "中國境內韓國反日獨立運動研究綱要", 韓國研究論叢, 1, pp.46~48 (1995)
- 馬軍, "戰後國民政府遣返韓人政策的演變及在上海地區的實踐", 史林, (2), pp.61~ (2006)
- 傅德華, "中國近代韓僑問題研究綜述", 學術月刊, (4), pp.90~ (2003)
- 孫科志, "上海韓人社會史硏究" (2003), 學苑出版社
- 孫科志, "上海韓人的宗敎活動", 檔案與史學, (1), pp.62~ (2000)
- 趙蘭亮, "試論抗戰勝利後上海的韓國僑民團體", 學術月刊, (12), pp.51~ (2000)
- 房建昌, "廣東韓僑小史及戰後國民黨對德, 意, 法等僑民的處理", 廣東史志, (2), pp.30~ (1999)
- 徐行, "中韓关關係上的重要一頁—戰後天津暨華北韓僑的集中管理與遣返", 近代史研究, (4) (2005)
- 馬軍, "戰後國民政府遣返韓人政策的演變及在上海地區的實踐", 史林, (2), pp.68~ (2006)
- 唐凌, "抗戰勝利後對僑民問題的處理", 八卦僑刊, (1) (2000)
- 齊德學, "抗美援朝戰爭研究述評", 當代中國史研究, (6) (2007)
- 張民, "論朝鮮戰爭的起因和結局", 黨的文獻, (2) (2001)
- 葛兆富, "關于朝鮮戰爭幾個重要問題研究綜述", 靑島大學師範學院學報, (5) (2002)
- 沈志華, "朝鮮戰爭揭秘" (1995), 天地圖書有限公司
- "第四座豊碑: 非赶超戰略 - 21世紀中國發展新戰略", pp.66~ (1998), 明報出版社
- 王國學, "中國抗美援朝戰略決策探析", 學術交流, (6), pp.150~ (2001)
- 陳效衛, "試論中國在朝鮮戰爭中的决策", 軍事歷史, (2) (2000)
- 齊德學, "抗美援朝戰爭研究述評", 當代中國史研究, (6), pp.27~ (2006)
- 王美鳳, "毛澤東力主出兵援朝", 唐都學刊, (2) (1999)
- 逢先知, "毛澤東與抗美援朝", 黨的文獻, (4), pp.36~38 (2000)
- 周材方, "試析朝鮮戰爭對新中國發展歷程的影響", 南京社會科學, (12) (2000)
- 隋淑英, "論朝鮮戰爭對中國的歷史影響", 聯城師範學院學報(哲學社會科學版), (3) (2000)
- 資中筠, "戰後美國外交史-從杜魯門到里根 上册", pp.236~ (1994), 世界知識出版社
- 金正浩, "朝鮮戰爭與東北亞格局", 延邊大學學報(社會科學版), (3) (1996)
- 陳尙勝, "최근 15년간 중국 학계의 청조와 조선 관계사에 대한 연구 논평, in: 동아시아의 관점에서 본 청사(淸史)연구", 이화사학연구소 제33회 정기학술대회, pp.107~115 (2008)
- 박강, "20세기 전반 동북아 한인과 아편", pp.11~ (2008), 선인
- 尹恩子, "중일전쟁 종결 후 南京市의 한국인 상황과 관리(1945.8-1946.3)", 韓國學論文集―第七屆韓國傳統文化國際學術會議, 15 (2007)