唐代 處士의 地位와 그 性格
Socio-Cultural Status of Chushi in Tang China
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores to understand Socio-cultural status of Chushi(處士) in Tang China. It is very usual to find a word Chushi on the inscriptions of the Tang period. Originally Chushi means an idealized type of the scholars who intentionally rejected to serve as the officials. In contrast, the deceased who was depicted as Chushi on the inscriptions cannot be the same as identical kind of Chushi. In these inscriptions, Chushi just meant a person who was not an official. They were proud of descendants of noble lineage and showed off eminent choronym what is so-called JunWang(郡望). It’s a clear contradiction in contrast with ideal image of Chushi. A number of them were tried to reveal the record of their ancestor’s office titles in detail. But the majority of office title names were a kind of honorary. Moreover, the grade of their ancestor’s office titles tended to fall down, actual office titles were below 6th grade which cannot give their descendants the privileges. These facts manifest that Chushi was not different from common scholars who wished to enter bureaucratic world. Chushi was a sort of literary title for the deceased. The title of Chushi in Tang China implies the efforts of the deceased to boost their social and cultural position by identifying themselves as an idealized scholar. Therefore it is not surprising to encounter the word Chushi so many times on the inscriptions.
Abstract
This paper explores to understand Socio-cultural status of Chushi(處士) in Tang China. It is very usual to find a word Chushi on the inscriptions of the Tang period. Originally Chushi means an idealized type of the scholars who intentionally rejected to serve as the officials. In contrast, the deceased who was depicted as Chushi on the inscriptions cannot be the same as identical kind of Chushi. In these inscriptions, Chushi just meant a person who was not an official. They were proud of descendants of noble lineage and showed off eminent choronym what is so-called JunWang(郡望). It’s a clear contradiction in contrast with ideal image of Chushi. A number of them were tried to reveal the record of their ancestor’s office titles in detail. But the majority of office title names were a kind of honorary. Moreover, the grade of their ancestor’s office titles tended to fall down, actual office titles were below 6th grade which cannot give their descendants the privileges. These facts manifest that Chushi was not different from common scholars who wished to enter bureaucratic world. Chushi was a sort of literary title for the deceased. The title of Chushi in Tang China implies the efforts of the deceased to boost their social and cultural position by identifying themselves as an idealized scholar. Therefore it is not surprising to encounter the word Chushi so many times on the inscriptions.
참고문헌 (85)
- 鄭淳模, "唐代 士人의 隱居 觀念과 그 變遷", 中國學報, 45 (2002)
- "儀禮注疏<十三經注疏 권13", pp.100~ (1996), 中華書局
- 鄭淳模, "唐 전반기 處士의 토지소유와 경영", 中國史硏究, 45 (2006)
- 烏廷玉, "論唐代士族與南北朝士族的差別", 歷史敎學, 87(4)
- 張澤咸, "‘唐宋變革論’若干問題的質疑, in: 中國唐史學會論文集" (1989), 三秦出版社
- 張澤咸, "唐代階級結構硏究", pp.58~77 (1996), 中州古籍出版社
- "貞觀政要 卷7", pp.226~227 (1978), 上海古籍出版社
- "高士廉傳, in: 舊唐書 卷65", pp.2443~2444
- "高儉傳, in: 新唐書 卷95", pp.3841~
- "太宗 貞觀12年條, in: 資治通鑑 卷195", pp.6135~6136
- "唐會要 卷36", pp.774~775 (1991), 上海古籍出版社
- "氏族, in: 太平廣記 卷184", pp.1377~1378, 李積
- "郡望, in: 十駕齋養新錄 卷12", pp.268~ (1968), 國學基本叢書⋅臺灣商務印書館
- 鄭淳模, "唐代 譜牒의 編纂과 그 變遷", 中國史硏究, 6 (1989)
- 周紹良, "唐代墓誌彙編 上⋅下" (1992), 上海古籍出版社
- 周紹良, "唐代墓誌彙編續集" (2001), 上海古籍出版社
- 周紹良, "全唐文補遺 1-6" (1994), 三秦出版社
- 박한제, "魏晉南北朝時代 墓葬習俗의 變化와 墓誌銘의 流行", 동양사학연구, 104(104), pp.37~83 (2008), 동양사학회
- 趙超, "中國古代石刻槪論", pp.32~46 (1997), 文物出版社
- "禮2, in: 宋書 권15", pp.407~
- "墓誌銘條, in: 陔餘叢考 권32"
- 吉川幸次郞, "中國文學入門", pp.37~38 (1973), 筑摩書房
- "唐語林 권1", pp.25~
- "唐語林 권6", pp.552~
- "舊唐書 卷190", pp.5043~
- "王維, in: 太平廣記 권255" (1987)
- "石誌, in: 封氏聞見記校注 권6", pp.56~
- 王行, "墓銘擧例", 石刻史料新編, 3(40), pp.65~ (1986), 新文豊出版社
- 王行, "韓昌黎文集 권6", pp.372~392 (1998), 上海古籍出版社
- "語石 권4", pp.116~117 (1936), 商務印書館
- "天官書5, in: 史記 권27", pp.1301~
- "韓愈傳, in: 新唐書 권176", pp.5269~
- "貢擧中, in: 唐會要 권76", pp.1642~1644
- "嚴善思傳, in: 舊唐書 권191", pp.5102~
- "雲麓漫鈔 권6", pp.99~103
- "隱逸, in: 大唐新語 卷10", pp.157~158
- "舊唐書 卷94", pp.3004~, 盧藏用傳
- "譯註 唐六典 上 卷4", pp.430~ (2003), 신서원
- "舊唐書 卷192", ~
- "賜隱士盧鴻一還山制, in: 全唐文, 卷21, 元宗皇帝", pp.252~253
- "授盧鴻一諫議大夫詔, in: 全唐文 卷27", pp.313~
- "隱逸傳, in: 新唐書 卷196"
- "論語注疏 第20, 十三經注疏", pp.2535~ (1996), 中華書局
- "唐代墓誌彙編 上", pp.333~345
- "李娃傳, in: 太平廣記 권484", pp.3987~3988
- 竹田龍兒, "唐代士人の郡望について", 史學, 24(4), pp.32~ (1952)
- 池田溫, "唐代の郡望表 上․下", 東洋學報, 42(3-4) (1959)
- 田廷柱, "隋唐士族", pp.12~34 (1990), 三秦出版社
- "經籍2, in: 隋書 권33", pp.990~
- "明帝紀, in: 周書 권4", pp.55~
- "杜臺卿傳, in: 北齊書 권24", pp.354~
- "北齊書 권42", pp.564~
- 長部悅弘, "隋の辟召制廢止と都市", 東洋史硏究, 44(2), pp.469~473
- "邑里, in: 史通新校注", pp.352~353 (1990), 重慶出版社
- "貞觀 12年 正月條, in: 資治通鑑 卷195", pp.6135~
- "太原鄕牒, in: 全唐文 권986", pp.10197~10198
- 郭鋒, "唐代士族個案硏究", pp.191~201 (1999), 夏門大學出版社
- 唐耕耦, "敦煌社會經濟文獻眞蹟釋錄 1", pp.85~ (1986), 書目文獻出版社
- "雲麓漫鈔 권3", pp.50~51
- 那波利貞, "唐代社會文化史硏究", pp.53~58 (1974), 創文社
- 礪波護, "唐の官制と官職, in: 唐代政治社會史硏究", pp.228~230 (1986), 同朋舍
- 西村元佑, "唐代敦煌差科簿を通じてみた唐均田制時代の徭役制度, in: 中國經濟史硏究", pp.612~619 (1970), 東洋史硏究會
- 김택민, "譯注唐律疏議 권2", pp.160~ (1994), 한국법제연구원
- "高宗紀, in: 新唐書 권3", pp.65~
- 金鐸敏, "隋 煬帝의 勳官 폐지와 唐代의 勳官 濫授", 歷史學報, 149 (1996)
- 張澤咸, "唐代階級結構硏究", pp.90~91 (1996), 中州古籍出版社
- 宮崎市定, "九品官人法の硏究", pp.510~511 (1977), 同朋舍
- "鄭處士墓誌, in: 全唐文 卷521", pp.5296~5297
- "處士盧君墓誌銘, in: 韓昌黎文集校注 第7卷", pp.552~553
- "故處士裴君墓誌, in: 柳河東全集 卷11", pp.120~121 (1991), 中國書店
- 呂思勉, "隋唐五代史", pp.1273~1277 (1980), 太平書局
- 嚴耕望, "唐人讀書山林寺院之風尙" (1959)
- 高明士, "唐代私學的發展", 文史哲學報, 20 (1971)
- "選擧3, in: 通典 卷15", pp.358~
- "選擧12, in: 文獻通考 卷39", pp.358~
- 礪波護, "中世貴族制の崩壞と辟召制, in: 唐代政治社會史硏究" (1986), 同朋舍
- "與鳳翔邢尙書書, in: 韓昌黎文集 卷3", pp.201~204
- "唐音癸簽 從談3", ~
- "處士段宏古墓誌, in: 柳河東全集, 補遺", pp.546~547
- "送石處士序, in:韓昌黎文集校注 第4卷", pp.278~281
- "送溫處士赴河陽軍序", pp.281~283
- 李德裕, "薦處士李原表, in: 全唐文 卷700", pp.5967~
- "薦處士李群玉狀, in: 全唐文 卷759", pp.7885~
- "薦處士陳禹狀, in: 全唐文 卷881", pp.9207~
- "隱逸傳, in: 舊唐書 卷192", pp.5115~5116