본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제말 전시경제체제기(1937～1945) 경북지역의 농업변동과 지주제

The Changes in Agriculture and the Landlord System in Gyeongsangbukdo Province Region during the Wartime Economy Period(1937-1947) at the end of the Japanese Imperialism

이윤갑
대구사학회 (Daegu Sahakhoe)|2010.05|대구사학 (DAEGUSAHAK)|제99권 |pp. 281-335

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

부재지주소작료통제령농업재편성정책동태적 지주조선농업계획the Agrarian Restructing Poicythe Absentee Landlordthe Active LandlordChosun Agrarian ProjectDecree on Farml Rent Control
주제분류역사학

초록

The colonial agricultural policy of the Japanese Imperialism was changed into the War Mobilization Policy after 1937 that Japan provoked the Sino-Japanese War. In the rural areas of Choseon, the War Mobilization Policy was unfolded into the production increase and the procurement of war supplies, the draft of soldiers and laborers of the munitions industry by force, and, for these, the strengthening of the control over ideology and the establishment of a resident mobilization system. The agricultural production of Choseon under the Japanese Imperialism was accomplished on the ground of a landlord system, and the agricultural productivity depended on the input of fertilizers and labor force. The War Mobilization brought about huge inconvenience. The production and the supply of fertilizers plunged because of the preferential assignment of industrial manufacturing materials into the production of the war supplies and large quantities of the rural labor force was draft into the military and the munitions industry by force. By these, the agricultural productivity plunged and there was a big snag in the War Mobilization. The Agrarian Restructuring Policy under the wartime of the Japanese Imperialism was carried out with a focus on the resolution of the crisis of the agricultural productivity. The Agrarian Restructuring Policy under the wartime of the Japanese Imperialism was unfolded into the organization of coproduce with a village as a unit and the expansion of the production function of landlords, for solving the problem of labor shortages. The Agrarian Restructuring Policy under the wartime of the Japanese Imperialism demanded the expansion of the production function of landlords and the absentee landlords who didn't accede to the demand were forced to manage their tenanted farms by farming contracts. But the control over the landlord system under the wartime was folded into the change from the general landlord system to the active landlord management of Japanese farming companies not into the dissolution of the landlord system. This study explained the truth about the control policy over the landlord system of the Japanese imperialism by the analysis of the Agrarian Restructuring Policy of Joseon under the wartime which was unfolded until the end of the Pacific War after the Sino-Japanese War.

Abstract

The colonial agricultural policy of the Japanese Imperialism was changed into the War Mobilization Policy after 1937 that Japan provoked the Sino-Japanese War. In the rural areas of Choseon, the War Mobilization Policy was unfolded into the production increase and the procurement of war supplies, the draft of soldiers and laborers of the munitions industry by force, and, for these, the strengthening of the control over ideology and the establishment of a resident mobilization system. The agricultural production of Choseon under the Japanese Imperialism was accomplished on the ground of a landlord system, and the agricultural productivity depended on the input of fertilizers and labor force. The War Mobilization brought about huge inconvenience. The production and the supply of fertilizers plunged because of the preferential assignment of industrial manufacturing materials into the production of the war supplies and large quantities of the rural labor force was draft into the military and the munitions industry by force. By these, the agricultural productivity plunged and there was a big snag in the War Mobilization. The Agrarian Restructuring Policy under the wartime of the Japanese Imperialism was carried out with a focus on the resolution of the crisis of the agricultural productivity. The Agrarian Restructuring Policy under the wartime of the Japanese Imperialism was unfolded into the organization of coproduce with a village as a unit and the expansion of the production function of landlords, for solving the problem of labor shortages. The Agrarian Restructuring Policy under the wartime of the Japanese Imperialism demanded the expansion of the production function of landlords and the absentee landlords who didn't accede to the demand were forced to manage their tenanted farms by farming contracts. But the control over the landlord system under the wartime was folded into the change from the general landlord system to the active landlord management of Japanese farming companies not into the dissolution of the landlord system. This study explained the truth about the control policy over the landlord system of the Japanese imperialism by the analysis of the Agrarian Restructuring Policy of Joseon under the wartime which was unfolded until the end of the Pacific War after the Sino-Japanese War.

참고문헌 (86)

  1. 문정창, "군국일본조선강점36년사" (1965), 백문당
  2. 김문식, "일제하의 경제침탈사" (1971), 아세아문제연구소
  3. 김광진, "조선에서의 자본주의적 관계의 발전" (1973), 사회과학출판사
  4. 최윤규, "조선 근대 및 현대경제사(19세기 중엽-1945.8)" (1986), 과학백과사전출판사
  5. 君島和彦, "朝鮮における戰時動員體制の展開過程, 日本ファシズムと東アシア" (1977), 靑木書店
  6. 宮田節子, "朝鮮民衆と皇民化政策" (1985), 未來社
  7. 최유리, "日帝末期 植民地 支配政策 硏究" (1997), 국학자료원
  8. 松本武祝, "戰時動員體制と村落, 植民地權力と朝鮮農民" (1998), 社會評論社
  9. 이송순, "일제하 전시 농업정책과 농촌경제" (2008), 선인
  10. 정연태, "1940년대 전반 일제의 한국농업 재편책-‘농업재편성정책’을 중심으로", 國史館論叢, 38 (1992)
  11. 정연태, "일제의 한국 농지정책(1905~1945)", 박사, pp.1994
  12. 洪性讚, "日帝下 金融資本의 農企業 支配-朝鮮殖産銀行의 成業社 設立과 그 運營", 東方學志, 68 (1990)
  13. 金容燮, "朝鮮信託의 農庄經營과 地主制 變動, 韓國近現代農業史硏究" (1992), 일조각
  14. 이송순, "戰時期 朝鮮의 地主權 弱化와 地主經濟의 實態", 韓國史學報, 14, pp.11~386 (2003), 고려사학회
  15. 김영희, "일제시대 농촌통제정책 연구", pp.101~106 (2003), 경인문화사
  16. "時局關係全鮮農山漁村振興關係官會同ニ於ケル大野政務摠監訓示要旨", 通報, 6, pp.13~ (1937)
  17. 八尋生南, "朝鮮にぉける農村振興運動を語, 資料選集 朝鮮における農村振興運動", pp.24~ (1983), 友邦協會
  18. 崔由利, "日帝末期 植民地支配政策 硏究", pp.86~91 (1997), 국학자료원
  19. 岩田龍雄, "戰時下朝鮮に於ける米穀政策の展開", 殖銀調査月報, 64, pp.21~ (1943)
  20. 全國經濟調査機關聯合會朝鮮支部, "朝鮮經濟年報", pp.105~ (1939)
  21. 慶尙北道 農務課, "慶北の農業", ~ (1938)
  22. 竹內淸三, "農事改良低利資金の貸付に對へ", 殖産銀行調査月報, 8
  23. "土性調査施行計劃と施行方法, 慶尙北道 農會報", ~ (1937)
  24. "慶北의 農業", 96~104 (1938)
  25. 경상북도, "慶尙北道 農務統計", 6~20 (1938)
  26. "慶尙北道農務統計", ~ (1930), 4.米作付反別及收穫高
  27. 棉作系, "慶北棉花의 反當增收에 就해, 慶尙北道農會報", 8~11 (1937)
  28. "慶尙北道 農會報", 26~29 (1937)
  29. "慶尙北道 農務統計", 13~ (1938)
  30. 權泰檍, "韓國近代綿業史硏究", pp.116~117 (1989), 일조각
  31. "釜山日報", ~ (1936), 頑迷地主에 警告 -블랙리스트를 작성하여 농사개량에 유의하려
  32. "地主敎育에 의해 農家更生의 새로운 指導法 -地主와 小作人의 關係를 再檢討하여 因習을 打破(咸興)", 京城日報, ~ (1936)
  33. "小作爭議의 緩和에 各郡에서 地主懇談 -積極的 農事指導(春川)", 朝鮮新聞, ~ (1937)
  34. "自給肥料增施와 優良品種의 장려 春川郡地主懇談會", 朝鮮新聞, ~ (1937)
  35. "空論에서 實行으로 地主懇談會 奮發 (沙里院)", 朝鮮民報, ~ (1937)
  36. "水利改修와 農糧供給 地主의 奮起要望 -旱害克服과 食糧增産에 不在地主도 動員-", 京城日報, ~ (1939)
  37. "地主懇談會에 本府의 要望 7項目", 京城日報, ~ (1939)
  38. "地主의 營農改善 5個年 計劃을 樹立 - 最終年에는 反當 5할 增收. 慶北當局 農事經營合理化를 圖謀-", 朝鮮民報, ~ (1937)
  39. "産米增殖目標로 地主報國會 自奮 -小作人 地主連絡打合會와 生産報國座談會 開催", 朝鮮民報, ~ (1939)
  40. "小作料統制令において農林局長談", 殖銀調査月報, 22, pp.80~83 (1940)
  41. 國民總力聯盟, "國民總力讀本", 16~ (1941)
  42. 國民總力朝鮮聯盟, "朝鮮に於ける國民總力運動史", 52~ (1945)
  43. 朝鮮銀行調査部, "朝鮮經濟年報", ~ (1948)
  44. 菱本長次, "朝鮮米의 硏究", 475~731 (1938)
  45. 岩田龍雄, "戰時下 朝鮮に於ける米穀政策の展開", 殖産銀行調査月報, 64, pp.1943~ (1943)
  46. 權大雄, "日帝末期 朝鮮貯蓄運動의 實體", 民族文化論叢, 7 (1986), 영남대 민족문화연구소
  47. 朝鮮金融組合聯合會, "籾天引貯蓄實施要綱決定", 調査彙報, 22, pp.25~26 (1941)
  48. 下脇光夫, "籾の供出を現地へ觀る-殖産契を中心に", 金融組合, 171, pp.96~ (1943)
  49. 朝鮮銀行調査部, "朝鮮經濟年報", Ⅰ~43 (1948)
  50. "朝鮮總督府調査月報", ~ (1931)
  51. 印貞植, "朝鮮의 農業地帶", 23~28 (1940)
  52. 權貴善, "慶尙北道史(中)", pp.142~ (1983), 慶尙北道史編纂委
  53. 朝鮮食糧營團, "朝鮮食糧營團", 5~ (1944)
  54. "慶尙北道 農務統計", 5~ (1938)
  55. , 朝鮮總督府調査月報, 15(4), pp.48~ (1944)
  56. 박경식, "조선인강제연행의 기록", pp.17~ (2008), 고즈윈출판사
  57. 김민영, "일제의 조선인노동력수탈 연구", pp.76~79 (1995), 한울아카데미
  58. 嶺南日報社, "1947년판 慶北總鑑", 338~339 (1948)
  59. , 殖銀調査月報, (64), pp.31~33 (1943)
  60. 久間健一, "朝鮮農政의 課題", 380~381 (1943)
  61. "臨時農地價格統制令의 倍率實施", 殖銀調査月報, (36), pp.78~79 (1941)
  62. 鈴木武雄, "朝鮮의 經濟", 262~263 (1942)
  63. "不在地主의 認定", 殖銀調査月報, (78), pp.27~28 (1944)
  64. "朝鮮農業計劃要綱", 殖銀調査月報, (64), pp.31~33 (1943)
  65. 京城日報社, "朝鮮年鑑", 107~ (1945)
  66. "農業增産强化 3要綱 發表", 殖銀調査月報, (72), pp.37~38 (1944)
  67. 京城日報社, "朝鮮年鑑", 107~ (1945)
  68. 久間健一, "巨大地主의 農民支配, 地主的 職能의 調整, 朝鮮農政의 課題", ~ (1943)
  69. 洪成讚, "日帝下 企業家的 農場型 地主制의 存在形態 -同福 吳氏家의 東皐農場 經營構造 分析", 經濟史學, 10 (1986)
  70. 洪成讚, "日帝下 企業家的 農場型 地主制의 歷史的 性格", 東方學志, 63 (1989)
  71. 張矢遠, "大地主의 農民支配의 構造와 性格 -소작농의 ‘사실상의 임노동자화’ 문제를 중심으로-, 日帝下 大地主의 存在形態에 관한 硏究", 박사, pp.1989
  72. "朝鮮興業株式會社 30周年記念誌", 66~100 (1936), 이하 󰡔記念誌󰡕로 略稱함
  73. "朝鮮興業 土地賃借證, 慶尙南道 小作慣行調査書", 27~29
  74. 淺田喬二, "日本帝國主義와 舊植民地地主制, 제3장 제3절 財閥地主의 存在構造 -朝鮮興業株式會社의 事例分析", ~ (1968)
  75. 윤수종, "일제하 일본인 지주회사의 농장경영분석 -조선흥업회사의 사례-", 한국사회사연구회논문집, 12 (1988)
  76. "記念誌", 80~105
  77. 金容燮, "日帝强占期의 農業問題와 그 打開方案, 韓國近現代農業史硏究", 393~395 (1991)
  78. 金容燮, "朝鮮信託의 農場經營과 地主制의 變動, 韓國近現代農業史硏究", 346~ (1991)
  79. "琴湖面의 小作爭議-會社의 不誠意로 惡化", 大邱日報, ~ (1929)
  80. "朝鮮土地興業小作人 二千五百名騷動", 東亞日報, ~ (1929)
  81. "旱害 餘波로 마침내 小作爭議 勃發 -慶山 朝鮮興業 不作人들이", 大邱日報, ~ (1929)
  82. 久間健一, "朝鮮農政의 課題", 14~ (1943)
  83. 張矢遠, "日帝下 ‘經營型地主’範疇의 設定을 위한 問題提起", 韓國放送通信大學論文集, 1 (1983)
  84. 金容燮, "日帝强占期의 農業問題와 그 打開方案, 韓國近現代農業史硏究", 393~395 (1991)
  85. 洪性讚, "日帝下 金融資本의 農企業支配 -不二興業(株)의 經營變動과 朝鮮殖産銀行-", 東方學志, 65 (1990)
  86. "朝鮮興業株式會社 30周年記念誌", 64~68

관련 논문AI추천

조선농촌진흥운동기(1932~1940) 경상북도 지역의 농업변동과 농민층 분해이윤갑대구사학회 · 대구사학2009 · 제95권 농촌진흥운동기(1932~1940)의 조선총독부의 소작정책이윤갑대구사학회 · 대구사학2008 · 제91권 「토지대장」을 통해 본 토지생산성의 변화(1910-1961) 김제시 죽산면 사례연구조석곤한국농촌경제연구원 · 농촌경제2013 · 제36권 제4호러일전쟁 직후 일본인 지주의 한국 진출 ―『군산농사월보』의 검토를 중심으로 ―이규수수선사학회 · 사림2015 · 제54호식민지 지주제와 石川縣農業株式會社하지연이화사학연구소 · 이화사학연구2013 · 제47호일제말기 생산소설 연구조진기우리말글학회 · 우리말글2008 · 제42권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

일본인의 조선여행기록에 비친 조선의 표상 -『大役小志』를 중심으로-이규수pp. 1-30일제시대 한국인의 일본여행에 비친 일본 -시찰단의 근대 공간성과 타자성 인식-박성용pp. 31-54엔닌(円仁)의 求法旅行과 唐 문화 체험이유진pp. 55-77치리아코의 지중해 기행과 고전고대의 발굴임병철pp. 79-109그랜드 투어(Grand Tour) vs 매스 투어리즘(Mass Tourism)?설혜심pp. 111-137
원문 보기