본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Plausibility of Religious Language in Religious Experience

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Abstract: This article aims to contend that religious language can refer to God. In terms of the relationship between religious experience and religious language, one of the main issues is whether the language used about religious experience can refer to God who is ontologically distinct from the human condition. There is a difference or a gap between the world and God simply because God is transcendent and therefore incomprehensible. The incomprehensibility of God may point to the limitations of human language in a sense that language tends to fail to articulate what is incomprehensible. Yet, one of the key categories through which the world may refer to God is that of experience itself. It is through the dynamic of experience that a person can encounter God, and human language may be able to represent what is absent as well as present. Accordingly, this article is going to show how religious language may signify God by discussing the importance of tradition and community, the nature of religious language, and the transformative power of religious language.

Abstract

Abstract: This article aims to contend that religious language can refer to God. In terms of the relationship between religious experience and religious language, one of the main issues is whether the language used about religious experience can refer to God who is ontologically distinct from the human condition. There is a difference or a gap between the world and God simply because God is transcendent and therefore incomprehensible. The incomprehensibility of God may point to the limitations of human language in a sense that language tends to fail to articulate what is incomprehensible. Yet, one of the key categories through which the world may refer to God is that of experience itself. It is through the dynamic of experience that a person can encounter God, and human language may be able to represent what is absent as well as present. Accordingly, this article is going to show how religious language may signify God by discussing the importance of tradition and community, the nature of religious language, and the transformative power of religious language.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Bonaventura, "Collationes in Hexaemeron" (2010), Brepols Publishers
  2. Cousins, E, "Mysticism and Language", pp.236~257 (1992), Oxford UP
  3. John of the Cross, "The Spiritual Canticle" (1934), Burns and Oates
  4. 김진숙, "고백성사의 언어 치료적 기능과 효용성 -죄의식으로부터 해방과 자유를 위한 언어적 성사-", 문학과 종교, 26(3), pp.23~43 (2021), 한국문학과종교학회
  5. Lash, Nicholas, "Easter in Ordinary" (1988), SCM Press
  6. Matthews, Melvyn, "Both Alike to Thee" (2000), SPCK
  7. McGinn, Bernard, "Mysticism. and Language", pp.202~235 (1992), Oxford UP
  8. Ricoeur, Paul, "Essays on Biblical Interpretation", pp.73~118 (1981), SPCK
  9. Ricoeur, Paul, "The Symbolism of Evil" (1969), Beacon Press
  10. Rout, Paul, "Religious Experience and Theology", ~
  11. Soskice, Martin, "Metaphor and Religious Language" (1985), Clarendon

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)