본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Methodological Reflecion on the Question of God

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류가톨릭신학

초록

The question of God in the modern period showed little vitality. Secularization, historical consciousness, the increase of atheistic and agnostic trends, and emphasis upon rationality made discourses about God lack vigor. By contrast, in the postmodern period, discourses about God make a strange return. With the return of religion, questioning and discourses about God have returned to the center of theology. There are three ways of questioning God in the intellectual traditions. Of course, these three questions are interrelated. First, where do we experience God? Second, how do we understand God? In other words, in what way do we think of God? Third, what impact do discourses about God have on us? The first question is apologetical, the second question methodological, and the third question practical. This paper deals with the second question, which is a methodological reflection on the question of God. The question is applied to Karl Rahner (a modern theologian) and some other postmodern theologians. Whereas Rahner's methodological approach to the question of God is metaphysical and epistemological, most postmodern theologians' methodological ways are postmetaphysical (phenomenological, deconstructive, semiotic, hermeneutical, critical, or practical). For most contemporary theologians, the questions about God and religious experiences are often examined and described phenomenologically and hermeneutically in meaningful fashion. The contemporary discourses about God are classified into four characteristics. First, most contemporary discourses about God are postmetaphysical. Contemporary theologians try to describe the phenomena relating to the mystery and to interpret them. Second, they seek to offer both a phenomenological description and a hermeneutical understanding. And most contemporary discourse about God is anthropological. On the one hand, philosophical anthropology is a main reference for some theologians. On the other hand, socio-political anthropology is a main reference for other theologians. Third, simply speaking, Habermasian theologians prefer analogical similarity, while Derridian theologians prefer analogical difference, even though both theologians always stress the tension between the analogical sameness and otherness. Fourth, orthodox theologians focus on fidelity to the tradition, liberal theologians focus on intelligibility, and liberation theologians focus on the practical function.

Abstract

The question of God in the modern period showed little vitality. Secularization, historical consciousness, the increase of atheistic and agnostic trends, and emphasis upon rationality made discourses about God lack vigor. By contrast, in the postmodern period, discourses about God make a strange return. With the return of religion, questioning and discourses about God have returned to the center of theology. There are three ways of questioning God in the intellectual traditions. Of course, these three questions are interrelated. First, where do we experience God? Second, how do we understand God? In other words, in what way do we think of God? Third, what impact do discourses about God have on us? The first question is apologetical, the second question methodological, and the third question practical. This paper deals with the second question, which is a methodological reflection on the question of God. The question is applied to Karl Rahner (a modern theologian) and some other postmodern theologians. Whereas Rahner's methodological approach to the question of God is metaphysical and epistemological, most postmodern theologians' methodological ways are postmetaphysical (phenomenological, deconstructive, semiotic, hermeneutical, critical, or practical). For most contemporary theologians, the questions about God and religious experiences are often examined and described phenomenologically and hermeneutically in meaningful fashion. The contemporary discourses about God are classified into four characteristics. First, most contemporary discourses about God are postmetaphysical. Contemporary theologians try to describe the phenomena relating to the mystery and to interpret them. Second, they seek to offer both a phenomenological description and a hermeneutical understanding. And most contemporary discourse about God is anthropological. On the one hand, philosophical anthropology is a main reference for some theologians. On the other hand, socio-political anthropology is a main reference for other theologians. Third, simply speaking, Habermasian theologians prefer analogical similarity, while Derridian theologians prefer analogical difference, even though both theologians always stress the tension between the analogical sameness and otherness. Fourth, orthodox theologians focus on fidelity to the tradition, liberal theologians focus on intelligibility, and liberation theologians focus on the practical function.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Balthasar, Hans, "The Moment of Christian Witness" (1969), New Man Press
  2. Bond, Phillip, "Post-Secular Philosophy" (1998), Routledge
  3. Caputo, John D, "The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida" (1997), Indiana University press
  4. Caputo, John D, "Philosophy and Prophetic Postmodernism: Toward a Catholic Postmodernity", American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 74 (2000)
  5. Caputo, John D, "The Insistence of God: A Theology of Perhaps" (2013), Indiana University Press
  6. Caputo, John D., "God, the Gift, and Postmoderinsm" (1999), Indiana University
  7. Caputo, John D., "Questioning God" (2001), Indiana University Press
  8. David, Tracy, "On Naming the Present" (1994), Orbis
  9. David, Tracy, "Public Theology, Hope, and the Mass Media, In God and Globalization, vol. 1" (2000), Trinity
  10. David, Tracy, "Approaching the Christian Understanding of God, In Systematic Theology, vol. 1" (1991), Fortress
  11. de Vries, Hent, "Philosophy and the Turn to Religion" (1999), Johns Hopkins University Press
  12. Derrida, Jacques, "Religion" (1998), Stanford University Press
  13. Gelpi, Donald L, "The Turn to Experience in Contemporary Theology" (1994), Paulist
  14. Grieco, Eileen Mary, "Love and Knowledge in Rahner", Aquinas, 40 (1997)
  15. Gschwandtner, Christina M, "Postmodern Apologetics: Arguments for God in Contemporary Philosophy" (2013), Fordham University Press
  16. Gutierrez, Gustavo, "On Job" (1987), Orbis
  17. Gutierrez, "The God of Life" (1991), Orbis
  18. Habermas, Jrgen, "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (1987), MIT Press
  19. Habermas, Jrge, "Religion and Rationality" (2002), MIT Press
  20. Haight, Roger, "Dynamics of Theology" (1990), Paulist
  21. Hart, David Bentley, "The Experience of God : Being, Conscious, Bliss" (2013), Yale University Press
  22. Hart, Kevin, "Fides et Ratio et", American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 76 (2002)
  23. Hauerwas, Stanley, "With the Grain of the Universe" (2001), Brazos
  24. Horner, Robyn, "Rethinking God as Gift" (2001), Fordham University Press
  25. Houtepen, Anton, "God: An Open Question" (2002), Continuum
  26. Johnson, Elizabeth A, "She Who Is" (1992), Crossroad
  27. Johnson, Elizabeth A, "Forging Theology, In Things New and Old, In Phyllis Zagano and Terrence W. Tilley" (1999), Crossroad
  28. Kant, Immanuel, "Lectures on Philosophical Theology" (1978), Cornell University Press
  29. Kaufman, Gordon D, "Is There Any Way from Athens to Jerusalem?", The Journal of Religion
  30. Kaufman, Gordon D, "In Face of Mystery" (1993), Harvard University Press
  31. Kearney, Richard, "The God Who May Be" (2001), Indiana University Press
  32. Levinas, Emmanuel, "Totality and Infinity" (1969), Duquesne University Press
  33. Losinger, Anton, "The Anthropological Turn" (2000), Fordham University Press
  34. Marion, Jean-Luc, "God without Being" (1991), Chicago University
  35. Metz, Johann Baptist, "A Passion of God" (1998), Paulist
  36. Milbank, John, "The Word Made Strange" (1997), Blackwell
  37. O'Donovan Leo J, "A World of Grace" (1995), Georgetown University Press
  38. Rahner, Karl, "Theological Investigations VI" (1965), Crossroad
  39. Rahner, Karl, "Foundations of Christian Faith" (1978), Crossroad
  40. Rahner, Karl, "Hearer of the Word" (1994), Continuum
  41. Rahner, Karl, "Experiences of a Catholic Theologian", Theological Studies, 60 (2000)
  42. Scanlon, Michael J, "Systematic Theology and the World Church", The Catholic Theological Society of America, 39 (1984)
  43. Schreiter, Robert J, "The Praxis of Christian Experience" (1989), Harper & Row
  44. Sheehan, Thomas, "Karl Rahner: The Philosophical Foundations" (1987), Ohio University Press
  45. Stone, Jerome A, "The Minimalist Vision of Transcendence" (1992), SUNY
  46. theology, "Erring: A Postmodern A", pp.1984, Taylor, Mark C
  47. Taylor, Mark C, "nOts" (1993), Chicago University Press
  48. Taylor, Mark C, "About Religion" (1999), Chicago University Press
  49. Taylor, Mark C, "The Moment of Complexity" (2001), Chicago University Press
  50. Taylor, Mark Lloyd, "God is Love" (1986), Scholars Press
  51. Vass, George, "A Theologian in Search of a Philosophy, volume 1" (1985), Sheed &Ward
  52. Vattimo, Gianni, "After Christianity" (2002), Columbia University Press
  53. Ward, Graham, "Cities of God" (2000), Routledge
  54. Westphal, Merold, "Postmodern Philosophy and Christian Thought" (1999), Indiana University Press
  55. Westphal, Merold, "Overcoming Onto-theology" (2001), Fordham University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)