본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

바흐친의 초기 미학에 나타난 유신론적 테마 - 작가론을 중심으로

Theistical Themes in Bakhtin's Early Aesthetics

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

In Bakhtin's aesthetic system there are three elements of art in text; these are material, content and form. But what allows for creativity is the sight of the author. It is also the writer who grants unity to the whole work as well as to the figure of the hero. He also includes and completes the world in which the hero belongs. The writer is creative, productive and active in forming energy. These notions of the writer are very similar to those attributed to God in the Orthodox Church which emphasizes the difference between a divine's essence and energy. Above all, the most important feature of a writer is his 'outsideness'. This means that he should exist outside of the hero in the sense of the spacial, temporal as well as value estimative and meaning plans. Bakhtin applies this concept of 'outsideness' relevant in the aesthetical level to the ontological and metaphysical levels arguing that man cannot exist without 'other' and 'absolute otherness', just as the hero cannot exist without the writer, his creator. Then, which relation does the writer have with the hero? At first, it is the relation of 'other'; the writer becomes an 'absolute otherness' to the hero. He aesthetically justifies the hero, not restricted by his failure in either the past or present. This incarnated, fundamental, and essentially authentic One is the writer in an aesthetic level and God in a metaphysical level. Secondly, the writer presents a personal relation to the hero. Even though the writer, who creates the hero, holds possession of prominent consciousness, he gives up his right to intervene in the hero’s story and grants the hero independence and freedom of personality. These characteristics of a writer share certain elements with the 'kenosis'(self-denial) of the Son of God, who abandons His will to complete the Father's. Finally, God grants free will to man through self-sacrifice; this is called 'personal love'. In conclusion, Bakhtin, through his aesthetic thinking, insists that the hero cannot aesthetically exist without the writer. Similarly man cannot find self-fulfillment and so requires 'absolute otherness' for self-identity and self-justification. Every person is an unrepeatable and unique being! There is an 'absolute otherness' that justifies and loves me even where I cannot justify and love myself! This is a contemporary version of Bakhtin's aesthetic gospel for those that are exhausted with an empty and meaningless existence.

Abstract

In Bakhtin's aesthetic system there are three elements of art in text; these are material, content and form. But what allows for creativity is the sight of the author. It is also the writer who grants unity to the whole work as well as to the figure of the hero. He also includes and completes the world in which the hero belongs. The writer is creative, productive and active in forming energy. These notions of the writer are very similar to those attributed to God in the Orthodox Church which emphasizes the difference between a divine's essence and energy. Above all, the most important feature of a writer is his 'outsideness'. This means that he should exist outside of the hero in the sense of the spacial, temporal as well as value estimative and meaning plans. Bakhtin applies this concept of 'outsideness' relevant in the aesthetical level to the ontological and metaphysical levels arguing that man cannot exist without 'other' and 'absolute otherness', just as the hero cannot exist without the writer, his creator. Then, which relation does the writer have with the hero? At first, it is the relation of 'other'; the writer becomes an 'absolute otherness' to the hero. He aesthetically justifies the hero, not restricted by his failure in either the past or present. This incarnated, fundamental, and essentially authentic One is the writer in an aesthetic level and God in a metaphysical level. Secondly, the writer presents a personal relation to the hero. Even though the writer, who creates the hero, holds possession of prominent consciousness, he gives up his right to intervene in the hero’s story and grants the hero independence and freedom of personality. These characteristics of a writer share certain elements with the 'kenosis'(self-denial) of the Son of God, who abandons His will to complete the Father's. Finally, God grants free will to man through self-sacrifice; this is called 'personal love'. In conclusion, Bakhtin, through his aesthetic thinking, insists that the hero cannot aesthetically exist without the writer. Similarly man cannot find self-fulfillment and so requires 'absolute otherness' for self-identity and self-justification. Every person is an unrepeatable and unique being! There is an 'absolute otherness' that justifies and loves me even where I cannot justify and love myself! This is a contemporary version of Bakhtin's aesthetic gospel for those that are exhausted with an empty and meaningless existence.

참고문헌 (71)

  1. 강영안, "주체는 죽었는가?현대 철학의 포스트모던 경향" (2001), 문예출판사
  2. 강영안, "데카르트에서 칸트까지" (2002), IVP
  3. 강영안, "타인의 얼굴:레비나스의 철학" (2006), 문학과지성사
  4. 김욱동, "대화적 상상력: 바흐친의 문학 이론" (1988), 문학과 지성사
  5. 김욱동, "바흐친과 대화주의" (1990), 나남
  6. 로스끼, B., "동방교회의 신비신학에 대하여" (2003), 한장사
  7. 바흐친, M., "도스또예프스끼의 시학: 도스또예프스끼 창작의 제문제" (1988), 정음사
  8. 바흐친, M., "마르크스주의 언어철학" (1988), 한겨레
  9. 바흐친, M., "말의 미학" (2006), 길
  10. 바흐친, M., "바흐찐의 소설미학" (1988), 열린책들
  11. 박건용, "바흐친 초기의 문학 이론(1919-1924) I: <예술과 책임>과 <행위철학에 대하여>를 중심으로" (1919)
  12. 박순영, "마르틴 부버.대화철학의 해석학적 발상나와 너를 중심으로" (1997), 한국해석학회
  13. 배영미, "바흐친의 타자 연구:오스틴,포우,앤,브론테의 경우", 박사, pp.2004
  14. 서정욱, "신칸트학파와 헤르만 코헨" (1997), 한국동서철학연구회
  15. 여홍상, "바흐친과 문학이론" (1995), 문학과 지성사
  16. 이득재, "바흐찐과 칸트-행동철학에 대하여”에 대한 소고", 러시아어문학연구논집 (2002), 한국러시아문학회
  17. 이득재, "바흐찐과 타자", 박사, pp.1996
  18. 이득재, "바흐찐 데리다 비트겐쉬타인 어문학연구" (1998), 대구효성카톨릭대학교 인문학연구소
  19. 이득재, "바흐찐 읽기" (2003), 문학과 과학사
  20. 이문영, "바흐찐 이론과 사상의 체계적 통일적 전유를 위한 서론", 러시아어문학연구논집 (2000), 한국러시아문학회
  21. 이용권, "바흐친 언어 이론의 다면적 고찰" (2006)
  22. 이은경, "바흐친의 국내수용에 관한 비판적 고찰(1) - '대화이론'을 중심으로", 노어노문학, 16(2), pp.255~285 (2004), 한국노어노문학회
  23. 조준래, "건축학에서 삶의 건축학으로: 행동 철학에 부쳐의 과제와 한계", 슬라브학보, 16(1)
  24. 조준래, "외재화된 현실:바흐찐의 사상적 진화 연구", 슬라브연구 (2001), 한국외국어대학교 외국학종합연구센터 러시아 연구소
  25. 츠베탕 토도로프, "바흐찐: 문학 사회학과 대화 이론" (1987), 까치
  26. 클라크, K., "바흐친" (1993), 문학세계사
  27. Александрова,Р.И., "Категории <бытия> и <сознания> в нравственной философии М.Бахтина", .М.Бахтин и философская культура ХХ века.Спб., ~ (1991)
  28. Александрова,Р.И.М.М.Бахтин о проблемах духовности.Вестник мордовского университета.Саранск, "No.1", ~ (1991)
  29. Александрова, Р. И, "Этическое и эстетическое в творчестве М. М. Бахтина", ~ (1994)
  30. Бабич, В. В, "Лосский и Бахтин. Опыт сравнения", ~ (1994)
  31. Бахтин, М. М., "Автор и герой в эстетической деятельности", ~ (2000)
  32. Бонецкая, М. М, "Бахтин в двадцатые годы", ~ (2002)
  33. Бердяев, Н. А, "назначении человека. Москва", ~ (2006)
  34. Бочаров, С. Г, "Об одном разговоре и вокруг него", ~ (1993)
  35. Бочаров, С. Г., "Событие бытия", ~ (2002)
  36. Братченко, С. Л, "Концепция личности: М. Бахтин и психология", ~ (1991)
  37. Булгаков, С., "Свет невечерный", ~ (2001)
  38. Булгаков,С, "Этика в православии", ~ (2001)
  39. Васильев, А. К, "Образ <другого> как проблема антропологии М. М. Бахтина", ~ (1992)
  40. Гутнер, Г, "Христианское понимание личности и современная философия сознания", ~ (2003)
  41. Есаулов, И, "Полифония и сборность(М. М. Бахтин и Вяч. Иванов)", ~ (1997)
  42. асухина, В. Н, "Соборность как нравственный идеал в русской религиозной философии конца ?Ⅹ-начала ХХ веков. Автореферат диссертации на соискание учебной степени кандидата философских наук", ~ (2000)
  43. Иванов, Вяч, "По звездам. Борозды и межи", ~ (2007)
  44. Ильинский, О, "Религиозные взгляды раннего Бахтина", ~ (1985)
  45. Исупов, К. Г, "Альтернатива эстетической антропологии: М. М. Бахтин и П. А. Флоренский", ~ (1990)
  46. Круткин, В. Л, "Ценностное осмысление человеческой целесности в работах М. М. Бахтина", ~ (1992)
  47. Махлин, В. Л, "Другой", ~ (1997)
  48. Назинцев, В. В, "Мыслитель Бахтин и теоретик Хайдеггер", ~ (1991)
  49. Панцо, А, "“<Другoсть> у Бахтина, Бланшо и Левинас", ~ (1995)
  50. Попова, И. Л, "Об эстетической норме у М. Бахтина", ~ (1991)
  51. Селиванов, В. В, "Душа и духовность", ~ (1990)
  52. Соловьёв, В, "Бахтин и Ницше”. Фридрих Ницше и русская религиозная философия", ~ (1996)
  53. Тамарченко, Н. Д, "Бахтин и В. Розанов", ~ (1995)
  54. Трубин, В. Н, "Карнавал. Религия. Политика. Теософия", ~ (1990)
  55. Фаустов, А. А, "К вопросу о концепции автора в работах М. М. Бахтина", ~ (1986)
  56. Фёдоров, В. В, "К понятию эстетического бытия", ~ (1991)
  57. Флоренский, П. А, "Столп и утверждене и истины", ~ (1990)
  58. Шелепанова, Т. В., "М. М. Бахтин и традиции русской философско-эстетической мысли начала ХХ в", ~ (1992)
  59. Эмерсон, К, "Против закономерности: Соловьёв, Шестов, Поздний Толстой, ранний Бахтин", ~ (1995)
  60. Эмерсон, К, "Русское православие и ранний Бахтин", ~ (1992)
  61. Averintsev, S., "Bakhtin, Laughter, and Christian Culture”. Bakhtin and Religion: A feeling for Faith" (2001), Evanston
  62. Coates, R., "Christianity in Bakhtin: God and the Exiled Author" (1998), Cambridge
  63. Coates, R., "The first and the Second Adam in Bakhtin's Early thought" (2001), Evanston
  64. Contino, P. J., "Introduction: A Feeling for Faith”. Bakhtin and Religion: A feeling for Faith" (2001), Evanston
  65. Jacobs, A., "Bakhtin and the Hermeneutics of Love" (2001), Evanston
  66. Lock, C., ""Bakhtin and the Tropes of Orthodoxy"" (2001), Evanston
  67. Mikhailovic, A., "A Corporeal Words: Mikhail Bakhtin's Theology of Discourse" (1997), Evanson
  68. Pechey, G., "Philosophy and Theology in "Aesthetic Activity" (2001), Evanston
  69. Pool, R.A., "The Apophatic Bakhtin" (2001), Evanston
  70. Shukman, A., "Bakhtin's Tolstoy Prefaces" (1989), Evanston
  71. Ware, T., "The Orthodox Church" (1964)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)