The Moon Is Down by John Steinbeck from the Angle of Reader-Response Criticism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
John Steinbeck’s only wartime novelette The Moon Is Down was controversial in that the conquerors and the conquered are neutrally observed even though this work is for the propagandistic properties during the Second World War. In other words, the Nazi invaders are described as Hamlet-like humans—under pressure, capable of cowardice and courage as much as the residents of the occupied town. Nevertheless, readers, notably of the occupied countries, turn out to have loved this work and so the author’s war effort seems to have been effective. As to this, I insist that this work is an excellent material for subjective reader-response criticism because it is too brief and abstract in terms of objectivity. To prove this argument, this essay observes the humanness of the novelette based on the characters’ activities along the plot and then criticizes controversial parts. As a result, the negative reviews are usually emphatic about the objective aspects while the readers, especially of the conquered countries, seem to have received it in a subjective way. Indeed, from the reader-response theories of Hans Robert Jauss and Stanley Fish, The Moon Is Down deserves to function as a propaganda literature well enough to argue that democracy is superior to totalitarianism and wins the war. Lastly, it is added that Steinbeck’s description of the humanness of the enemies should not be underestimated.
Abstract
John Steinbeck’s only wartime novelette The Moon Is Down was controversial in that the conquerors and the conquered are neutrally observed even though this work is for the propagandistic properties during the Second World War. In other words, the Nazi invaders are described as Hamlet-like humans—under pressure, capable of cowardice and courage as much as the residents of the occupied town. Nevertheless, readers, notably of the occupied countries, turn out to have loved this work and so the author’s war effort seems to have been effective. As to this, I insist that this work is an excellent material for subjective reader-response criticism because it is too brief and abstract in terms of objectivity. To prove this argument, this essay observes the humanness of the novelette based on the characters’ activities along the plot and then criticizes controversial parts. As a result, the negative reviews are usually emphatic about the objective aspects while the readers, especially of the conquered countries, seem to have received it in a subjective way. Indeed, from the reader-response theories of Hans Robert Jauss and Stanley Fish, The Moon Is Down deserves to function as a propaganda literature well enough to argue that democracy is superior to totalitarianism and wins the war. Lastly, it is added that Steinbeck’s description of the humanness of the enemies should not be underestimated.
참고문헌 (30)
- Arendt, Hannah, "Eichmann in Jerusalem" (1963), Penguin
- Arsenian, Seth, "The Meaning of Humanics" (1967), Springfield College
- Bradbury, Mark D, "“The Moon Is Down.” Rev. of The Moon Is Down, by John Steinbeck", Rev. of The Moon Is Down, by John Steinbeck. Public Integrity, 9(2), pp.201~204 (2007)
- Benson, Jackson J, "The True Adventures of John Steinbeck, Writer: A Biography" (1984), Viking
- Bowman, James S, "The Professional Edge: Competencies in Public Service" (2004), Sharpe
- Chamberlain, John, "“Books of the Times.” Rev. of The Moon Is Down", New York Times, 19~ (1942)
- Coers, Donald V, "John Steinbeck as Propagandist: The Moon Is Down Goes to War" (1991), U of Alabama P
- Doob, Leonard W, "Propaganda: Its Psychology and Technique" (1935), Henry Holt
- Fish, Stanley, "Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies" (1989), Clarendon
- Fish, Stanley, "There's No Such Thing as Free Speech, and It's a Good Thing, Too" (1994), Oxford UP
- Fontenrose, Joseph Eddy, "John Steinbeck: An Introduction And Interpretation" (1963), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Iser, Wolfgang, "The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response" (1978), The Johns Hopkins UP
- Jauss, Hans Robert, "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory", New Literary History, 2(1), pp.7~37 (1970)
- Jung, Carl G, "Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung Vol. 7" (1975), Princeton UP
- Levant, Howard, "The Novels of John Steinbeck: A Critical Study" (1974), U of Missouri P
- Lisca, Peter, "John Steinbeck, Nature and Myth" (1978), Crowell UP
- Lisca, Peter, "The Wide World of John Steinbeck" (1958), Rutgers UP
- McElrath Jr, Joseph R, "John Steinbeck: The Contemporary Reviews. Vol. 8" (2009), Cambridge UP
- Moore, Harry Thornton, "The Novels of John Steinbeck: A First Critical Study" (1968), Kennikat
- Frank G. Nelson, "Letter", New Republic, 495~ (1942)
- Railsback, Brian E, "A John Steinbeck Encyclopedia" (2006), Greenwood
- Schultz, Jeffrey D, "Critical Companion to John Steinbeck: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work" (2009), Infobase
- Shillinglaw, Susan, "John Steinbeck: Centennial Reflections by American Writers" (2002), Center for Steinbeck Studies
- Steinbeck, John, "The Log from the Sea of Cortez" (1995), Penguin
- Steinbeck, John, "The Moon Is Down" (2007), Penguin
- Steinbeck, John, "My Short Novels", pp.7~8 (1953), Wings
- Steinbeck, John, "Reflections on a Lunar Eclipse", pp.3W~ (1963), Herald Tribune
- Thurber, James, "What Price Conquest", The New Republic, 30, pp.370~ (1942)
- Timmerman, John H, "John Steinbeck’s Fiction: The Aesthetics of the Road Taken" (1986), U of Oklahoma P
- Tyson, Lois, "Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide" (2006), Taylor and Francis