현대중국어 ‘정도부사+명사’ 구문에 대한 인지적 접근 ― ‘很+명사’ 구문을 중심으로
A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to the “Degree Adverb + Noun” Construction in Modern Chinese: Focusing on the “Hen+Noun” Construction
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, the “Hen+noun” construction was investigated targeting the BCC corpus including spoken data. Based on this, the types and characteristics of nouns combined with degree adverbs were outlined, and the reasons for how nouns were able to be combined with degree adverbs were analyzed from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. Many of the nouns combined with “Hen” were abstract nouns. Abstract nouns are among the most atypical members in the category of nouns. Next, concrete nouns are more likely to be combined with “Hen” as they have more connotative meanings than conceptual meanings, and concrete nouns such as desks and chairs, which have almost no connotation, are members of typical nouns, so they can’t be combined with “Hen”. In the case of proper nouns, it was allowed to combine with “Hen” only if it has various attributes or characteristics or has a representative associative meaning. Otherwise it is difficult to combine with “Hen”. Based on these characteristics, through categorization and prototype theory of cognitive linguistics, this paper finds the atypical noun members are more likely to be combined with degree adverbs, while typical noun members can be combined with degree adverbs if they activate the inclusive meaning through metaphor and metonymy.
Abstract
In this paper, the “Hen+noun” construction was investigated targeting the BCC corpus including spoken data. Based on this, the types and characteristics of nouns combined with degree adverbs were outlined, and the reasons for how nouns were able to be combined with degree adverbs were analyzed from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. Many of the nouns combined with “Hen” were abstract nouns. Abstract nouns are among the most atypical members in the category of nouns. Next, concrete nouns are more likely to be combined with “Hen” as they have more connotative meanings than conceptual meanings, and concrete nouns such as desks and chairs, which have almost no connotation, are members of typical nouns, so they can’t be combined with “Hen”. In the case of proper nouns, it was allowed to combine with “Hen” only if it has various attributes or characteristics or has a representative associative meaning. Otherwise it is difficult to combine with “Hen”. Based on these characteristics, through categorization and prototype theory of cognitive linguistics, this paper finds the atypical noun members are more likely to be combined with degree adverbs, while typical noun members can be combined with degree adverbs if they activate the inclusive meaning through metaphor and metonymy.
참고문헌 (30)
- 모지향, "대명동사 분류에 대한 고찰 및 원형이론의 활용 가능성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2018
- 박정운, "범주화와 언어학", 한국어 의미학, 7 (2000)
- 方緖軍, "現代漢語實詞" (2000), 華東師範大學出版社
- 徐杏雨, "“副+名”結構硏究", 碩士, pp.2007
- 邵敬敏, "论“太”修饰形容词的动态变化现象", 汉语学习, (1) (2007)
- 邵敬敏, "“副+名”组合與语義指向新品種", 语言教學與研究, (6) (2005)
- 施春宏, "名词的描述性语義特征與副名组合的可能性", 中国语文, (3) (2001)
- 王 薇, "副詞+名詞結構的認知意義分析", 寧波廣播電視大學學報, (4) (2008)
- 王 寅, "構式語法硏究(下卷) : 分析應用" (2011), 上海外語敎育出版社
- 姚雙雲, "“程度副詞+名詞”結構的多角度硏究", 碩士, pp.2007
- 于根元, "副+名", 语文建设, (1) (1991)
- 袁毓林, "词类范畴的家族相似性", 中国社会科學, (1) (1995)
- 劉正光, "非范畴化與“副词+名词”结構", 外国语, (2) (2005)
- 劉 茁, "范畴化與原型理论对“程度副词+名词”结構的解释能力", 深圳大學學报(人文社会科學版), (1) (2009)
- 劉曉峰, "“副+名”结構的语義分析", 盐城师范學院學报(人文社会科學版), (2) (2002)
- 이기동, "인지언어학" (2000), 한국문화사
- 이현희, "범주로서의 품사와 품사 전형성 - 명사와 그 중복 범주를 대상으로 -", 한국학연구, (39), pp.359~384 (2011), 한국학연구소[DOI]
- 张国安, "关于副词修饰名词问题", 汉语学习, (6) (1995)
- 张琳鹏, "基于概念整合理论浅谈对“程度副词+名词”结构的再认识", 青年文学家, (36) (2020)
- 张谊生, "名词的语義基础及功能转化與副词修饰名词", 语言教學與研究, (4) (1996)
- 张谊生, "名词的语義基礎及功能转化與副词修饰名词(续)", 语言教學與研究, (1) (1997)
- 丁加勇, "汉语"程度副词+指人名词"结構中的理想认知模型", 湖南人文科技學院學报, (3) (2007)
- 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1982), 商務印書館
- 陈一民, "关于名词前的副词", 湘潭师范学院学报, (1) (1999)
- 邹韶华, "名词性状特征的外化问题", 语文建设, (2) (1990)
- 邢福義, "“很淑女”之类说法的语言文化背景的思考", 语言研究, (2) (1997)
- 和树美, "浅议汉语中“很+名词”格式的合理性及其发展趋势", 铜陵职業技术學院學报, (2) (2018)
- Rosch, "Cognitive reference points", Cognitive Psychology, 7 (1975)
- Taylor, "Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory" (1989), Clarendon Press
- Wittgenstein, "Philosophical Investigations" (1953), Macmillan